Skip to content

Satisfaction Survey After Distal Surgery Performed Under Local Infiltration (Walant) or Under Axillary Block

Satisfaction Survey After Distal Surgery Performed Under Local Infiltration (Walant) or Under Axillary Block

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04855149
Acronym
WALAX
Enrollment
202
Registered
2021-04-22
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2020-12-01
Last updated
2021-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesiology, Satisfaction, Patient, Surgery

Brief summary

In the 1970s-1980s, Dr. Donald Lalonde (surgeon, Canada) developed an anesthetic technique for hand surgery called WALANT (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet). This technique is based on the joint administration of a local anesthetic (lidocaine) and epinephrine (adrenaline), which limits bleeding and makes it possible to dispense with a tourniquet. In addition, and contrary to truncal anesthesia, this combination of drugs infiltrated opposite the surgical site preserves the mobility of the limb. However, this technique is not without risk and some adverses events have been reported: intoxication by local anesthetics due to overdose and digital necrosis with the use of procaine or cocaine. Currently in France, truncal anesthesia with a pneumatic tourniquet on the arm is often preferred for hand surgery (axillary block or BAx). In this case, the pneumatic tourniquet is used to minimize intraoperative blood loss and improve the visibility of the operating field. However, it can be a source of discomfort, pain, or transient neurological deficit. To date, few studies comparing WALANT and BAx are available and none have evaluated the perioperative experience of patients and the incidence of paresthesias in the short and long term. In order to measure the perioperative satisfaction of patients undergoing hand surgery with BAx or WALANT, we conduct a prospective observational non-randomized study evaluating the EVAN-LR satisfaction score at D0. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate postoperative adverse events (digital necrosis, paresthesias, local anesthetic intoxications, infection of the operated limb), consumption of postoperative analgesic treatments in both groups.

Interventions

OTHERPatient satisfaction

Patient satisfaction evaluated with EVAN LR questionnaire

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 yars * scheduled surgery of the hand, wrist or elbow under local or loco-regional anesthesia * Consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

* contraindication to loco-regional or local anesthesia * allergy to the products administered (lidocaine, epinephrine) * pregnant woman * comprehension disorder (confusion, cognitive disorder...) or linguistic disorder that does not allow answering the follow-up questionnaires * refusal to participate or to follow up * surgery in emergency or under general anesthesia Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction of day case surgeryDay 0Satisfaction of day case surgery measured with EVAN LR score (EVAN LR : Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie LocoRégionale; the EVAN-LR comprises 19 items, structured in a global index and five dimensions: Attention, Information, Discomfort, Waiting, and Pain; , All dimensions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the best possible level of satisfaction and 0 the worst)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026