Skip to content

Cyanoacrylate Use in Free Gingival Graft

The Effects of Cyanoacrylate on Self-reported Outcomes and Healing Following Free Gingival Graft Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04854902
Enrollment
23
Registered
2021-04-22
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
2021-01-30
Last updated
2021-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession, Localized

Brief summary

Present study aims to reveal the effects of cyanoacrylate application at the recipient bed and the donor site in free gingival graft surgery on the healing parameters and patient-based outcomes.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFree gingival graft

1.5-2 x 5 x 10 mm size epithelialized graft harvested from the palate is stabilized in the mandibular anterior single-tooth recession region

PROCEDURECyanoacrylate

N-Butyl-Cyanoacryle is applied to stabilize the graft to the recipient bed and to coat the donor site wound

PROCEDURESuture

The graft is stabilized with 6/0 polyvinylidene fluoride suture to the recipient bed

Sponsors

Biruni University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Single-tooth gingival recession in the anterior mandibular region * Pain with chewing or oral hygiene practice * Ongoing recession

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic disease * Smoking * Pregnancy / lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Re-epithelizationone week after the surgeryDonor site re-epithelization: hydrogen-peroxide is applied to the donor area with the help of an injector, and it is recorded as complete when no foaming occurs
Post-operative pain1st weekVisual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10), self-reported outcome 0 - no pain (min.) 10 - unbearable (max.)
Oral health impact profile (OHIP-14)BaselineThe patients are asked to fill provided OHIP-14 forms Questionnaire about satisfaction related to oral health, scored as 0-4 (never - always) 14 questions in total 0 (min.) - 56 (max.) Lower scores represent higher oral health related life quality
Graft dimensions1st monthMesio-distal (horizontal) and apico-coronal (vertical) width of the graft is measured with a periodontal probe, rounding to the nearest mm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Paresthesia / hyperesthesia in the donor site1st monthThe patient marks the visual analogue scale (0-10) after rubbing the donor site with a periodontal probe (to give a reference, symmetrical area is rubbed first) 0 - Paresthesia / hyperesthesia, 10 - no sensation difference with the reference area
Color harmony1st weekColor harmony between the graft and the neighboring keratinized tissue at the recipient site, examiner gives a score ranging 0-10 0 - completely different tone/color of the graft; 10 - no detectible tone difference
Mucosal thicknessIn the beginning of the surgery (baseline)15 endodontic reamer is inserted to the palatal mucosa 5 mm apical of the gingival margin of the second premolar; under local anesthesia

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026