Skip to content

Indo-cyanine Green (ICG) in Paediatric Oncology MIS

An Open Label, Single Centre, Single Arm, Prospective Feasibility Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Near-infrared Fluorescence (NIRF) Using Indo-cyanine Green (ICG) in Minimally Invasive Paediatric Oncology Surgery (MIS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04854018
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-04-22
Start date
2021-04-30
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2023-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma, Metastatic Osteosarcoma, Non-Rhabdo. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Pediatric Renal Tumor, Pulmonary Metastasis, Rhabdomyosarcoma

Keywords

Indocyanine green, Near Infra-red fluoroscopy, pediatric, oncology, minimal access surgery, Wilms

Brief summary

Indo-cyanine green (ICG) is a dye that has been used for a variety of adult and paediatric uses since 1956. Over the past few years, near infrared (NIRF) technology has been developed which allow is use as a fluorescence agent during surgery. It has been used increasingly in the field of adult oncology surgery and has been shown to increase the efficacy of this surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of NIRF and ICG during specific minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures within paediatric oncology surgery. Their use will complement existing surgical techniques rather than replace them. Given the published advantages in adults this study aims to provide evidence of feasibility in the paediatric patients with cancer.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to show the feasibility of using ICG in combination with NIRF and MIS in paediatric oncology surgery. It has been used increasingly over the past few years for a range of adult oncology surgical indications including tumour margin identification, lymph node identification and pulmonary metastectomy. It will be investigated in three groups of patients in our study: 1. Tumour margin identification-Identifying the margins of a tumour intra-operatively is crucial for many paediatric cancers. Incomplete resections or resections with involved margins often require upstaging of treatment with more intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy. ICG will be injected intravenously and then NIRF will be used intermittently until fluorescence is achieved and an evaluation of the tumour and its margins will be performed. 2. Lymph node identification - It is standard of care for most oncology resections to remove lymph nodes that are suspected to be involved with tumour. Both SIOP and COG recommend the removal of 7 or more lymph nodes during a nephrectomy for Wilm's tumour although this is often not achieved. IGC will be injected directly into the tumour (or the adjacent tissue in 2-4 places) and then NIRF will be used intermittently until fluorescence is achieved. An evaluation of the tumour and any fluorescent lymph nodes will then take place and any fluorescent lymph nodes will be removed. 3. Pulmonary metastectomy - Many paediatric cancers including Wilm's tumour have a propensity to metastasise to the lungs. Removal of all lung metastases is important as it has the potential to down-stage tumours, obviating the need for pulmonary radiotherapy. Modern radiology techniques can identify lesions as small as 1mm which are often not palpable at the time of surgery. Relying on finger palpation requires patients to have a thoracotomy with all of the associated complications. ICG will be injected intravenously and then NIRF will be combined with MIS to identify any fluorescent lesions. The location of any lesions will be compared with those seen on pre-surgical imaging (current standard practice). For all three groups of patients, the use of ICG and NIRF will complement rather than replace existing surgical technique in patients who require surgery already. Data will be collected on the number of lesions which do/do not fluoresce as well as the histology of lesions removed. They will be separated into lesions which do not fluoresce, lesions which were removed before fluorescence (they will be checked for ex-vivo fluorescence) and fluorescing lesions so that the histological characteristics of each group can be compared.

Interventions

DRUGIndocyanine green

Intravenous or intraparenchymal injection

Sponsors

Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

open label, single centre, single arm, prospective feasibility study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 1 day and 15 years 365 days * Have a diagnosis of an intra-abdominal, retroperitoneal or intra-thoracic tumour or pulmonary metastases * Require surgery as part of their treatment * Tumour or metastasis suitable for MIS resection based on assessment of the pre-operative imaging

Exclusion criteria

* Allergic to ICG * Allergic to iodine or iodides * Due to receive radioactive iodine as part of a treatment * Hyperthyroidism * Unwilling to participate * Chronic Kidney Disease stage V

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of fluorescent nodes resected during minimally invasive tumour nephrectomyUntil the end of surgery, 2 hoursNumber of fluorescent nodes resected per patient
Is Fluorescent guided tumour resection easier than non-fluorescent guided.until the end of surgery, 2 hoursSubjective surgeon analysis of intra-operative conditions on a Likert scale per patient
To evaluate if NIRF and ICG allow detection of pulmonary metastasesuntil the end of surgery, 2 hoursComparison of number of lesions seen on CT with those seen with fluoroscopy per patient

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate if fluorescent nodes or metastases are more likely to contain viable tumouruntil histopathology is reported, 2 weeksNumber of fluorescent nodes and metastases containing viable tumour per patient

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026