Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Participants With Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Tezepelumab in Participants With Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis (WAYPOINT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04851964
Acronym
WAYPOINT
Enrollment
416
Registered
2021-04-21
Start date
2021-04-22
Completion date
2024-12-11
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Keywords

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, Nasal polyps, Nasal polyposis

Brief summary

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Tezepelumab in Participants with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis

Detailed description

This is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab in adults with severe, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Approximately 400 subjects will be randomized globally. Participants will receive tezepelumab, or placebo, administered via subcutaneous injection using the accessorized pre-filled syringe (APFS) every 4 weeks, over a 52-week treatment period. The study also includes a post-treatment follow-up period of 12-24 weeks for participants who complete the 52-week treatment period. All participants will have background mometasone furoate nasal spray or equivalent intranasal corticosteroid at a stable dose from Visit 1 and throughout the screening and study period.

Interventions

Tezepelumab subcutaneous injection

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo subcutaneous injection

DRUGMometasone furoate or equivalent intranasal corticosteroid

Background MFNS or equivalent INCS at stable dose

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Amgen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-Blind

Intervention model description

Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either tezepelumab or matching placebo both administered subcutaneously.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants with physician-diagnosed CRSwNP for at least 12 months prior to Visit 1 that have: 1. Severity consistent with need for surgery as defined by total NPS ≥ 5 (≥ 2 for each nostril) at screening, as determined by the central reader 2. Nasal Congestion Score (NCS) ≥ 2 at Visit 1 3. Ongoing documented NP symptoms over \> 8 weeks prior to screening such as rhinorrhea and/or reduction/loss of smell 2. SNOT-22 total score ≥ 30 at screening (Visit 1) 3. Any standard of care for treatment of CRSwNP provided the participant is stable on that treatment for 30 days prior to Visit 1 4. Documented treatment of nasal polyposis exacerbation with SCS for at least 3 consecutive days or one IM depo-injectable dose (or contraindications/intolerance to) within the past 12 months prior to Visit 1 but not within the last 3 months prior to Visit 1 and/or any history of NP surgery (or contraindications/intolerance to)

Exclusion criteria

1. Any clinically important comorbidities other than asthma (e.g. active lung infection, bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis, hypereosinophilic syndromes, etc.) that could confound interpretation of clinical efficacy results. 2. Sinus surgery within 6 months of screening visit OR any sinus surgery in the past which changed the lateral wall of the nose making NPS evaluation impossible. 3. Positive COVID-19 PCR test (or COVID-19 rapid test) or COVID-19 entry screening questionnaire during the screening visit. Evaluation will be based on on local standard of care as determined by current local guidelines. 4. Regular use of decongestants (topical or systematic) at enrolment is not allowed unless used for endoscopic procedure 5. Use of immunosuppressive medication (including but not limited to: methotrexate, troleandomycin, cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, gold, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, systemic corticosteroids or any experimental anti-inflammatory therapy) within 3 months prior to Visit 1 and during the study period. Systemic corticosteroid use is defined as treatment with a burst of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 consecutive days or a single IM depo-injectable dose of corticosteroids (considered equivalent to a 3-day burst of systemic corticosteroids). 6. Receipt of COVID-19 vaccine (regardless of vaccine delivery platform) 28 days prior to date of IP administration at Visit 3 (randomisation visit).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Polyp Score at Week 52Baseline to Week 52The total nasal polyp score (NPS) is the sum of the right and left nostril scores (maximum of 8), as evaluated by nasal endoscopy. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. The left and right score will be based on a central read with a scale from 0 to 4. Each nasal endoscopy is evaluated by two independent physician reviewers.
Change From Baseline in Bi-weekly Mean Nasal Congestion Score (NCS) at Week 52Baseline to Week 52The NCS is captured by one item in the NPSD (nasal polyps symptom diary) asking participants to rate the severity of their worst NC over the past 24 hours using the following response options: 0 - None; 1 - Mild; 2 - Moderate; 3 - Severe. Baseline will be the mean of daily responses from Day -13 to Day 0. Bi-weekly (14-day) mean NCS will be calculated if at least 8 days in each 14-day period has evaluable data; otherwise the bi-weekly mean is set to missing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Bi-weekly Mean Loss of Smell at Week 52Baseline to Week 52Participant reported sense of smell will be evaluated as part of the NPSD. Loss of smell is captured by the DSS item (difficulty with sense of smell) in the NPSD asking participants to rate the severity of their worst difficulty with sense of smell over the past 24 hours using the following response options: 0 - None; 1 - Mild; 2 - Moderate; 3 - Severe. Baseline will be the mean of daily responses to the from Day -13 to Day 0. Bi-weekly (14-day) mean loss of smell will be calculated if at least 8 days in each 14-day period has evaluable data; otherwise the bi-weekly mean is set to missing.
Change From Baseline in SinoNasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) at Week 52Baseline to Week 52SinoNasal Outcome Test 22 scores are participant-reported and assess physical problems, functional limitations and emotional consequences of SinoNasal conditions. Patient-reported symptom severity and symptom impact over the past 2 weeks are captured via a 6-point scale (0-No Problem to 5-Problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of item scores and has a range from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes).
Change From Baseline in Lund Mackay Score Evaluated by CT at Week 52.Week 52The Lund-Mackay score scoring system is used to provide a quantitative assessment of nasal sinuses on sinus CT scans. Based on the sinus CT images, the five sinuses (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid and frontal) on each site are score by central radiologist as follows: (0-Normal; 1-Partial Opacification; 2-Total Opacification). The osteomeatal complex is scored for right and left sides (0 - Not occluded; 2- Occluded). The total score ranges from 0 to 24 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes).
Percentage of Participants With Nasal Polyp Surgery Decision and/or Systemic Corticosteroid for Nasal Polyposis up to Week 52Up to Week 52Surgery is defined as any procedure involving instruments resulting in incision and removal of tissue (e.g., polypectomy, endoscopic sinus surgery). Rescue treatment of NP is defined as requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids (SCS) for at least 3 consecutive days (a single depo-injectable dose of corticosteroids will be considered equivalent to a 3-day course of systemic corticosteroids). Time to first NP surgery decision or SCS for NP = (date of the first NP surgery decision or start date of first SCS for NP use - date of randomisation)+1. Kaplan Meier estimates of percentage of participants with events and 95% confidence interval are provided for each treatment group.
Percentage of Participants With Nasal Polyp Surgery Decision up to Week 52Up to Week 52Surgery is defined as any procedure involving instruments resulting in incision and removal of tissue (e.g., polypectomy, endoscopic sinus surgery). Time to first NP surgery decision = (date of the first NP surgery decision - date of randomisation)+1. Kaplan Meier estimates of percentage of participants with events and 95% confidence interval are provided for each treatment group.
Percentage of Participants With Systemic Corticosteroids for Nasal Polyposis up to Week 52Up to Week 52Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) for nasal polyposis (NP) is defined as requiring at least 3 consecutive days (a single depo-injectable dose of corticosteroids was considered equivalent to a 3-day course of SCS) for NP. Time to first SCS for NP = (start date of first SCS for NP use - date of randomisation)+1. Kaplan Meier estimates of percentage of participants with events and 95% confidence interval are provided for each treatment group.
Change From Baseline in Bi-weekly Mean Nasal Polyposis Symptom Diary Total Symptom Score at Week 52Baseline to Week 52The participant completed the nasal polyposis symptom diary each morning throughout the study. The participant was asked to consider their experience with nasal polyposis/nasal polyps over the past 24 hours when responding to each question. Participants were asked to report their experience with nasal polyposis symptoms (nasal blockage, nasal congestion, runny nose, postnasal drip (mucus drainage down the throat), headache, facial pain, facial pressure, difficulty with sense of smell). Participants reported the severity of each symptom and symptom impact at its worst using a 4-point verbal rating scale (0-None to 3-Severe). A total symptom score (range from 0 to 24) was calculated by taking the sum of the 8 equally weighted symptom items. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume (L) in 1 Second at Week 52.Baseline to Week 52For participants with comorbid asthma and aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD)/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD), difference in change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in the tezepelumab arm as compared to placebo at Week 52. FEV1 is defined as the volume of air exhaled from the lungs in the first second of forced expiration.

Countries

Canada, China, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBrian Lipworth, MD

University of Dundee

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJoseph K Han, MD

Eastern Virginia Medical School

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 416 participants were randomized, 6 of which were removed from analyses due to GCP issues, before study unblinding. The remaining 410 were randomized to either the treatment arm (204 participants) or placebo (206 participants) arms of the double-blind treatment period. Two participants were randomized but not dosed (one was withdrawal by subject, one did not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria). Therefore, 203 participants started in the treatment arm and 205 in the placebo arm.

Pre-assignment details

All patients completed a 5-week run-in period during which inclusion/exclusion criteria were assessed, medical history was recorded, nasal endoscopy and biopsy and CT scan were performed, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical laboratory tests were performed.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
26 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
179 Participants
Age, Continuous49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.63
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
194 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
97 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
149 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
266 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4080 / 2031 / 205
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 408119 / 203119 / 205
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40811 / 20314 / 205

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 31, 2026