Skip to content

Effects of ivAED™ Device on Air-in-line Alarms and Workflow Disruption

Optimizing Value in Critical Care: Effect of Braun Infusomat®Space I IV Infusion Pump and ivEAD™ Air Elimination Device on Air-in-line Alarms and Workflow Disruption

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04851782
Enrollment
55
Registered
2021-04-20
Start date
2021-03-29
Completion date
2024-06-01
Last updated
2024-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infusion

Keywords

Infusion, Alarms

Brief summary

The investigators propose to test the hypothesis, that is, the effectiveness of the ivAED to eliminate air-in-line, comparing two commercially available, standard IV infusion pumps: the Braun Infusomat® Space P and the Becton-Dickenson Alaris™ model 8100 pump (the latter is currently in use as the standard IV infusion pump at Keck Hospital of USC). Testing of an IV infusion pump other the Keck Hospital of USC standard is indicated, as the independent laboratory testing of the Alaris™ 8100 pump found that this model pump is prone to developing air bubbles as the infusion passes through the pump mechanism. These air bubbles can be sufficient to trigger the air-in-line alarm. The Braun Infusomat® Space P IV infusion pump is a market leader like the Alaris™ 8100 pump, was evaluated in independent testing with and without the ivAED™ device, and was NOT found to create bubbles.

Detailed description

There are very few controlled human studies in the literature that assess various existing preventative measures for air embolism. After extensive, independent pre-clinical laboratory testing of the ivAED™ device demonstrating efficacy in removing air-in-line from IV infusions (see Appendix 1), this is the first-in-humans, clinical application of the ivAED™ device. Testing of the ivAED™ device in patients is justified as that is the only means to determine the impact of the device on clinical IV infusion and nursing workflow disruptions (the primary outcomes of the study). Testing of the device in animals, or in healthy volunteers, or in computer simulations cannot provide this real-world information. In addition, the FDA typically requires that laboratory pre-clinical testing be coupled with clinical testing when applying for approval of new, investigational devices. The investigators propose to test the hypothesis, that is, the effectiveness of the ivAED to eliminate air-in-line, comparing two commercially available, standard IV infusion pumps: the Braun Infusomat® Space P and the Becton-Dickenson Alaris™ model 8100 pump (the latter is currently in use as the standard IV infusion pump at Keck Hospital of USC). Testing of an IV infusion pump other the Keck Hospital of USC standard is indicated, as the independent laboratory testing of the Alaris™ 8100 pump found that this model pump is prone to developing air bubbles as the infusion passes through the pump mechanism. These air bubbles can be sufficient to trigger the air-in-line alarm. The Braun Infusomat® Space P IV infusion pump is a market leader like the Alaris™ 8100 pump, was evaluated in independent testing with and without the ivAED™ device, and was NOT found to create bubbles.

Interventions

DEVICEivEAD tubing kit

ivEAD tubing designed to reduce infusion pump alarms do to air in infusion line

Sponsors

University of Southern California
CollaboratorOTHER
Herrick Medical LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants either have Braun Infusomat Pump with ivEAD tubing or standard pump OR another pump with or without ivEAD tubing or standard tubing

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Surgical ICU patients that are receiving IV infusions * Patients or their surrogates have provided written, informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who do not give consent to our researchers * Children (patients \<18 years of age) * Pregnancy * Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of air-in-line IV infusion alarms (as detected by the IV infusion pump)Patients will participate in the study from the time of enrollment in the ICU for up to 3 daysNumber of air-in-line IV infusion alarms (as detected by the IV infusion pump)
Disruption of nursing workflow, measured as number of minutes required to attend to alarm and restore infusion flow.Patients will participate in the study from the time of enrollment in the ICU for up to 3 daysDisruption of nursing workflow, measured as number of minutes required to attend to alarm and restore infusion flow.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CostPatients will participate in the study from the time of enrollment in the ICU for up to 3 daysCost of disruption of nursing workflow, as measured by time-driven, activity-based costing
Loss of InfusatePatients will participate in the study from the time of enrollment in the ICU for up to 3 daysLoss of infusate secondary to clearance of air in line

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026