Skip to content

Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy For the Treatment of Proximal Ureteric Stone

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy and Flexible Ureteroscopy For the Treatment of Proximal Ureteric Stone

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04851171
Enrollment
140
Registered
2021-04-20
Start date
2020-11-26
Completion date
2023-01-31
Last updated
2021-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stone Ureter, Ureteric Stone

Keywords

Urolithiasis, Ureteroscopy, Ureteric stone, Flexible ureteroscopy, Semi-rigid ureteroscopy

Brief summary

The present study is randomized in nature, comparing the stone free rate and complications rate between semi-rigid ureteroscopy (SR-URS) and Flexible Ureteroscopy (F-URS) for the treatment of Proximal Ureteric stone (PUS), whereby the preoperative assessments, procedure and reporting of outcomes will all be standardized.

Detailed description

There are various treatment options that can be used for the treatment of PUS, which include extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), antegrade uretero-lithotripsy, laparoscopy, and rarely, open surgical procedures. However, the standard, and the most frequently used modalities are SWL and ureteroscopy. When comparing the effectiveness in the treatment of Proximal Ureteric stone (PUS) between SWL and URS, SWL has lower rates of complication and morbidity, but URS has a higher likelihood of successfully treating the patient within a single procedure. Additionally, with the advancements in technology and miniaturization of the ureteroscopes, along with the presence of auxiliary instruments such as holmium laser and retrieval baskets, ureteroscopy is more widely used. In the proximal ureter, SR-URS tends to encounter difficulties in accessing the stone, but F-URS aids in overcoming those difficulties. As a result, the use of F-URS for PUS has indicated a strong success rate with lower likelihood of complications. When comparing the drawbacks of the two types of modalities, F-URS tends to be more expensive, and requires auxiliary instruments. And SR-URS tends to have lower success rate along with an increased rate in complications. The precedence of FURS over SR-URS in the treatment of PUS is yet to be extensively studied. Presently there are only five studies that have compared the two modalities of treatment. But, due to the lack standardization of variables, procedure, follow-up imaging and reporting of outcomes in the past studies, it is imperative to conduct study that is prospective and randomized in nature. The present study is randomized in nature, comparing the stone free rate and complications rate between SR-URS and F-URS for the treatment of PUS, whereby the preoperative assessments, procedure and reporting of outcomes will all be standardized.

Interventions

Flexible ureteroscopy is the use of flexible ureteroscope for the treatment of stone in the upper ureter with the aid of laser lithotripsy.

PROCEDURESemi-rigid Ureteroscopy

Semi-rigid ureteroscopy is the use of the semi-rigid ureteroscope for the treatment of stone in the upper ureter with the aid of laser lithotripsy.

Sponsors

Hamad Medical Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Single proximal ureteric stone indicated for active treatment with ureteroscopy (stented or non-stented)

Exclusion criteria

* Solitary Kidney * Bilateral ureteric stones * Ipsilateral multiple simultaneous ureteric stones * Ipsilateral kidney stone * Active UTI * Coagulopathy diseases * Ipsilateral ureteral anomalies, ureteral disorder (tumor or stricture) or previous ureteral open surgery. * Pregnant patients. * Unable to give informed consent. * Patient is not agreeing to go through the randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone free rateFour weeksSone free status will be assessed by doing CT KUB scan 4 weeks postoperative and it is defined as patients with no residual stones or clinically insignificant residual fragments (\< 2 mm).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication rateThree MonthsTo evaluate the complication rate post procedure including infection rate, genitourinary injury, hematuria, emergency visits rate and we will use of modified Calvin Dindo classification to grade the surgical complications.
To compare stone free rate and complications between patients with ureteric stent and patients without ureteric stentThree MonthsPatients will be stratified into two groups: group 1 with ureteric stents and group 2 without ureteric stents. Then comparison between the two groups in regards the stone free rate and the complications rate as per the previous definitions.

Countries

Qatar

Contacts

Primary ContactIbrahim Alnadhari, MD, FRCS Uro
ibrahimah1978@yahoo.com, IAlnadhari@hamad.qa,+974-33403324/ +974-40115093
Backup ContactOmar Ali, MD
omarisam1972@yahoo.com, oali@hamad.qa+974- 55175719/ +974-40115441

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026