Skip to content

Comparison of Different Feature Engineering Methods for Automated ICD Coding

Comparison of Different Feature Engineering Methods for Automated ICD Coding

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04849195
Enrollment
6947
Registered
2021-04-19
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2021-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Brief summary

Using traditional machine learning classifiers, this study targets on comparing bag-of-words, word2cec and roberta on automated ICD coding related to cardiovascular diseases in Chinese corpus.

Detailed description

ICD coding is quite important as it serves as basis for a wide range of economic and academic applications. Currently, manual coding is mainly adopted, which faces several limits like being time-consuming and prone to error, and this makes automated ICD coding via machine learning a hot research topic. As an inevitable phase during machine learning, feature engineering plays a crucially important role in leading to promising coding performance. Although have reached enlightening conclusions, existing studies lacked comparison of different feature engineering methods. Finding out what methods under what circumstances perform better can be quite helpful in promoting practical applications of automated coding. The investigators will implement this study based on inpatient' data collected from electronic medical records from Fuwai Hospital, the world's largest medical center for cardiovascular disease. Bag-of-words, word2cec and roberta will be respectively used to extracted features from training data. Then code-wise logistic regression classifiers and support vector machine classifiers will be trained to auto-assign codes. Afterwards, performances of the models on test data will be evaluated.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

No intervention

Sponsors

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admissions in Fuwai Hospital, from January 1, 2019, to February 28, 2019

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ICD-10 codes for each admissionAt the end of enrollmentEach admission will be a sample in this study. The ICD-10 codes assigned by medical coders for each admission will be collected as the primary outcome.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026