Skip to content

IPD Meta-analysis of De-escalation Treatment Strategy After PCI in ACS

Comparison of De-escalation Treatment Strategy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04848766
Enrollment
9000
Registered
2021-04-19
Start date
2021-06-07
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

percutaneous coronary intervention, dual antiplatelet therapy, de-escalation

Brief summary

We will perform a systemic review of previously published data and an updated patient-level meta-analysis of studies, including the most recent publications. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the United States National Institutes of Health registry of clinical trials, and relevant websites were searched for pertinent published studies.

Detailed description

This is an individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPD Meta-analysis). This study population was incorporated from studies that were previoiusly published. We will perform a systemic review of previously published data and an updated patient-level meta-analysis of studies, including the most recent publications. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the United States National Institutes of Health registry of clinical trials, and relevant websites were searched for pertinent published studies. The electronic search strategy was complemented by manual examination of references cited by included articles, recent reviews, editorials, and meta-analyses. No restrictions were imposed on language, study period, or sample size. The search keywords include acute coronary syndrome, ACS, primary, percutaneous coronary intervention, PCI, de-escalation, guided, guide, antiplatelet, P2Y12 inhibitor, P2Y12, dual antiplatelet therapy, DAPT. Articles were included when they met the following prespecified criteria: (1) included the ACS patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES); (2) maintained DAPT for 1 year; (3) de-escalation strategy of DAPT was clearly defined; (4) clinical outcomes, including ischemic and bleeding events, were clearly reported; (5) randomized controlled trials were considered for inclusion. Two independent investigators screened titles and abstracts, identified duplicated studies, performed full-article reviews, and determined the study inclusion. The third investigator supervised the searching process and adjudicated all the disagreements. After selecting eligible RCTs, we will incorporate all known randomized controlled trials requesting individual patient data from the principal investigator of each trial.

Interventions

DRUGDe-escalation Treatment Strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy

Patients receive de-escalation treatment of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention

Sponsors

St. Antonius Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

This study is a meta-analysis of previously published studies. Therefore, the eligibility criteria may be diverse according to the individual studies. \-------------------------- Inclusion Criteria: * Subject must have clinical diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome

Exclusion criteria

* The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE)1 year after interventioncomposite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and major bleeding.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite endpoint of Major adverse cardiovascular outcomes1 year after interventionall-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke
Major Bleeding outcome defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria1 year after interventionBleeding outcomes, defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria
Individual components of the primary outcome1 year after interventionall-cause mortality

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactHyo-Soo Kim, MD, PhD
hyosoo@snu.ac.kr82-2-2072-2226
Backup ContactJeehoon Kang, MD
medikang@gmail.com82-2-2072-2677

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026