Schizophrenia
Conditions
Brief summary
This study is open to adults with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia can affect the way a person thinks, their memory and their mental functioning. Examples include struggling to remember things, or to read a book or pay attention to a movie. Some people have difficulty calculating the right change or planning a trip so that they arrive on time. The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called Iclepertin improves learning and memory in people with schizophrenia. Participants are put into two groups randomly, which means by chance. One group takes Iclepertin tablets and the other group takes placebo tablets. Placebo tablets look like Iclepertin tablets but do not contain any medicine. Participants take a tablet once a day for 26 weeks. In addition, all participants take their normal medication for schizophrenia. During this time, doctors regularly test learning and memory of the participants by use of questionnaires, interviews, and computer tests. The results of the mental ability tests are compared between the groups. Participants are in the study for about 8 months and visit the study site about 14 times. During this time, doctors regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.
Interventions
One 10 milligram (mg) tablet once a day.
One tablet once a day.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients must be capable of providing signed and dated written informed consent by date of Visit 1 in accordance with ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and the local legislation prior to the admission to the trial. 2. Male or female patients who are 18-50 years (inclusive) of age at time of consent. 3. Diagnosis of schizophrenia utilizing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) with the following clinical features: * Outpatient, clinically stable and in the residual (non-acute) phase of their illness. * No hospitalization or increase in level of psychiatric care due to worsening of schizophrenia within 12 weeks prior to randomization. * Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score: items P1, P3-P6 ≤ 5 and item P2 and P7 ≤ 4 at Visit 1, and confirmed at Visit 2. 4. Patients should have functional impairment in day-to-day activities such as difficulties following conversation or expressing themselves, difficulties to stay focused, difficulties to remember instructions, what to say or how to get to places, per investigator judgement. 5. Patients maintained on current antipsychotic treatment (minimum 1 and maximum 2 antipsychotics, but clozapine is not allowed) for at least 12 weeks and on current dose for at least 35 days prior to randomization. \-- For patients on two antipsychotics, at least one antipsychotic must be within the approved label dose range. The second antipsychotic must not exceed the maximum daily dose per local label. Note: If the total dose is stable, different dosage forms of the same antipsychotic treatment will be considered as one antipsychotic. 6. Patients with any other concomitant psychoactive medications (except for anticholinergics) need to be maintained on same drug for at least 12 weeks and on current dose/ regimen for at least 35 days prior to randomization. * Maximum daily benzodiazepine load of up to 1 mg lorazepam-equivalent. * For any other psychoactive medications, doses cannot exceed the maximum daily dose per local label. 7. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per Non-Clinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals (ICH M3 (R2)) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria is provided in the protocol. Such methods should be used throughout the trial, and for a period of at least 35 days after last trial drug intake, and the patient must agree to periodic pregnancy testing during participation in the trial. 8. Have a study partner, defined as any person either private or professional who knows the patient well, has been capable of interacting with the patient on regular basis, and preferably consistent throughout the study. * The study partner must interact with the subject a minimum 1 hour per week and, preferably, at least 2 times a week. At least one interaction per week should be in person. * The study partner must have educational achievement of minimum 8th grade. * Professional study partners (e.g. study nurse, social worker etc.) are allowed if not involved in administration of any of the protocol assessments. Further inclusion criteria apply.
Exclusion criteria
1. Participant with current DSM-5 diagnosis other than Schizophrenia, including but not limited to bipolar, schizoaffective, major depressive disorder etc. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) for Psychotic disorders should be used for guidance. 2. Cognitive impairment due to developmental, neurological (e.g., epilepsy, stroke) or other disorders including head trauma, or patients with dementia or epilepsy. 3. Severe movement disorders * Leading to cognitive impairment (e.g. Parkinson dementia), or * Interfering with the efficacy assessments, or * Due to antipsychotic treatment that cannot be controlled with low dose anticholinergic treatment (equal to maximum 1 mg benztropine twice daily). 4. Any suicidal behavior in the past 1-year prior to screening and during the screening period. 5. Suicidal ideation of type 5 in the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (i.e. active suicidal thought with plan and intent) in the past 3 months prior to screening and up to and including Visit 2. \-- Patients with Suicidal Ideation type 4 in the C-SSRS (i.e. active suicidal thought with intent but without specific plan), within 3 months prior to screening and up to and including Visit 2, can be randomized in the study, if assessed and documented by a licensed mental health professional that there is no immediate risk of suicide. 6. History of moderate or severe substance use disorder (other than caffeine and nicotine), as defined in DSM-5 within the last 12 months prior to informed consent. 7. Positive urine drug screen at Visit 1 based on central lab test. 8. Patients who were treated with any of the following within 6 months prior to randomization: * Clozapine * Stimulants (e.g. methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, modafinil) * Ketamine or esketamine * Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or Modified ECT Further
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Overall Composite T-score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 26 Weeks of Treatment | MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported. | MCCB comprises 10 tests, which assess 7 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The larger the MCCB overall composite T-score, the better patient cognition. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on on-treatment periods. On-treatment is defined as the period of first drug administration/first resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP (residual effect period). The change from baseline was analyzed with a MMRM (mixed-effects model for repeated measures) with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was the repeated measure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Adjusted Total Time T-score in the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) | MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported. | The VRFCAT is a computerized assessment measuring the functional capacity of an individual to perform everyday tasks. It generates a composite score based on the amount of time taken to complete the tasks. The lower the VRFCAT T-score, the better patient's functional capacity. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the T-score in a general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with MMRM with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure. |
| Change From Screening Visit 1a in Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) Total Score at Week 24 | MMRM included measurements at Visit 1a (Week -2/Week -1), Week 15, and Week 24. Change from Visit 1a values at Week 24 is reported. | The Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) score evaluates how cognitive difficulties impact the daily life of individuals with schizophrenia. It is composed of 28 items on a 5-category Likert scale (1=not at all/not at all hard, 5=very much/very hard), and the total score was derived by calculating the average score of the first 26 items, where higher scores mean a worse patient experience. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with MMRM with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure. |
| Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Score After 26 Weeks of Treatment | MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported. | The SCoRS is an interview based- assessment tool to evaluate the cognitive function of individuals with schizophrenia that incorporates the input of the patient, the caregiver and the interviewer. It is composed of 20 items on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 20 to 140 points, where a higher score indicates a greater cognitive impairment. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies and partner change in SCoR assessment for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure. |
| Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard | At baseline and at Week 24. | The Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 SITA Standard is a diagnostic test to measure visual fields, or perimetry. The Humphrey visual field test measures the entire area of peripheral vision that can be seen while the eye is focused on a central point. During this test, lights of varying intensities appear in different parts of the visual field while the patient's eye is focused on a central spot. The perception of these lights is charted and then compared to results of a healthy eye at the same age of the patient to determine if any damage has occurred. The tests ranks from 0 to 100%, where 0 means no vision and 100 means perfect vision. |
| Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) | At baseline and at Week 24. | The central retinal thickness for both eyes was measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography (spectral domain OCT), which evaluates the retinal and sub-retinal structures of both eyes. |
| Change From Baseline in the T-score of the Number of Correct Responses on Tower of London at Week 26 | At baseline and at Week 26. | The Tower of London (ToL) evaluates executive functioning, reasoning, problem-solving, and goal-directed behavior. It measures the number of correct responses in solving an exercise that consists on moving colored balls to match a target configuration. The higher the ToL T-score, the better patient's cognitive function. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the T-score in a general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline comparing the groups was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including treatment, stratification factor of screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline number of correct responses on Tower of London T-score. |
Countries
Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Sweden, Turkey (Türkiye), United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, multinational, 26-week, parallel group trial. Patients could roll-over to safety follow-up extension trial (study 1346-0014). A dedicated ocular sub-study was implemented in several countries participating in the trial to investigate the ocular safety of iclepertin in patients with schizophrenia.
Pre-assignment details
All participants were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the trial. Participants attended a specialist site which ensured that they strictly met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Participants were not to be allocated to a treatment group if any of the entry criteria were violated.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Iclepertin 10 mg Patients with schizophrenia took orally once a day one 10 milligram (mg) tablet of iclepertin. | 312 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg Patients with schizophrenia took orally once a day one tablet of placebo-matching iclepertin. | 307 |
| Total | 619 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 12 | 11 |
| Overall Study | Burden of study procedures | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Change of residence | 2 | 3 |
| Overall Study | No reason available | 2 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Not treated | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other reason listed | 20 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Perceived lack of efficacy | 3 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Protocol deviation | 6 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Iclepertin 10 mg | Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 34.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 33.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 | 34.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 123 Participants | 123 Participants | 246 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 189 Participants | 184 Participants | 373 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) overall composite T-score | 28.6 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 | 28.8 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 | 28.7 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 53 Participants | 63 Participants | 116 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 88 Participants | 97 Participants | 185 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 21 Participants | 19 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 10 Participants | 6 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 139 Participants | 122 Participants | 261 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 107 Participants | 104 Participants | 211 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 205 Participants | 203 Participants | 408 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 312 | 1 / 307 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 81 / 312 | 91 / 307 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 12 / 312 | 16 / 307 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Overall Composite T-score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 26 Weeks of Treatment
MCCB comprises 10 tests, which assess 7 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The larger the MCCB overall composite T-score, the better patient cognition. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on on-treatment periods. On-treatment is defined as the period of first drug administration/first resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP (residual effect period). The change from baseline was analyzed with a MMRM (mixed-effects model for repeated measures) with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was the repeated measure.
Time frame: MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported.
Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Change From Baseline in Overall Composite T-score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 26 Weeks of Treatment | 2.283 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3094 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Change From Baseline in Overall Composite T-score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 26 Weeks of Treatment | 2.22 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3065 |
Change From Baseline in the T-score of the Number of Correct Responses on Tower of London at Week 26
The Tower of London (ToL) evaluates executive functioning, reasoning, problem-solving, and goal-directed behavior. It measures the number of correct responses in solving an exercise that consists on moving colored balls to match a target configuration. The higher the ToL T-score, the better patient's cognitive function. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the T-score in a general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline comparing the groups was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including treatment, stratification factor of screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline number of correct responses on Tower of London T-score.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 26.
Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis of this endpoint according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Change From Baseline in the T-score of the Number of Correct Responses on Tower of London at Week 26 | 1.103 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.6547 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Change From Baseline in the T-score of the Number of Correct Responses on Tower of London at Week 26 | 0.475 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.6477 |
Change From Screening Visit 1a in Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) Total Score at Week 24
The Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) score evaluates how cognitive difficulties impact the daily life of individuals with schizophrenia. It is composed of 28 items on a 5-category Likert scale (1=not at all/not at all hard, 5=very much/very hard), and the total score was derived by calculating the average score of the first 26 items, where higher scores mean a worse patient experience. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with MMRM with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure.
Time frame: MMRM included measurements at Visit 1a (Week -2/Week -1), Week 15, and Week 24. Change from Visit 1a values at Week 24 is reported.
Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis of this endpoint according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Change From Screening Visit 1a in Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) Total Score at Week 24 | -0.258 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0317 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Change From Screening Visit 1a in Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) Total Score at Week 24 | -0.305 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0316 |
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Score After 26 Weeks of Treatment
The SCoRS is an interview based- assessment tool to evaluate the cognitive function of individuals with schizophrenia that incorporates the input of the patient, the caregiver and the interviewer. It is composed of 20 items on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 20 to 140 points, where a higher score indicates a greater cognitive impairment. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies and partner change in SCoR assessment for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure.
Time frame: MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported.
Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis of this endpoint according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Score After 26 Weeks of Treatment | -5.246 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.415 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Score After 26 Weeks of Treatment | -5.480 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.414 |
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Adjusted Total Time T-score in the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT)
The VRFCAT is a computerized assessment measuring the functional capacity of an individual to perform everyday tasks. It generates a composite score based on the amount of time taken to complete the tasks. The lower the VRFCAT T-score, the better patient's functional capacity. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the T-score in a general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with MMRM with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure.
Time frame: MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported.
Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis of this endpoint according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Adjusted Total Time T-score in the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) | 3.108 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.8089 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Adjusted Total Time T-score in the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) | 3.652 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.8018 |
Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)
The central retinal thickness for both eyes was measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography (spectral domain OCT), which evaluates the retinal and sub-retinal structures of both eyes.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 24.
Population: Ocular sub-study set: all treated patients who consented to participate in the ocular sub-study. Only patients with measurements were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) | Left eye - baseline | 231.52 micrometer | Standard Deviation 26.51 |
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) | Right eye - baseline | 233.12 micrometer | Standard Deviation 31.03 |
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) | Left eye - Week 24 | 237.67 micrometer | Standard Deviation 27.32 |
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) | Right eye - Week 24 | 235.46 micrometer | Standard Deviation 27.81 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) | Right eye - Week 24 | 240.49 micrometer | Standard Deviation 26.89 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) | Left eye - baseline | 230.38 micrometer | Standard Deviation 26.64 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) | Left eye - Week 24 | 236.10 micrometer | Standard Deviation 25.96 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) | Right eye - baseline | 235.00 micrometer | Standard Deviation 25.45 |
Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard
The Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 SITA Standard is a diagnostic test to measure visual fields, or perimetry. The Humphrey visual field test measures the entire area of peripheral vision that can be seen while the eye is focused on a central point. During this test, lights of varying intensities appear in different parts of the visual field while the patient's eye is focused on a central spot. The perception of these lights is charted and then compared to results of a healthy eye at the same age of the patient to determine if any damage has occurred. The tests ranks from 0 to 100%, where 0 means no vision and 100 means perfect vision.
Time frame: At baseline and at Week 24.
Population: Ocular sub-study set: all treated patients who consented to participate in the ocular sub-study. Only patients with measurements were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard | Left eye - baseline | 93.83 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.82 |
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard | Right eye - baseline | 95.87 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard | Left eye - Week 24 | 94.48 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.69 |
| Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard | Right eye - Week 24 | 95.83 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.69 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard | Right eye - Week 24 | 95.83 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.69 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard | Left eye - baseline | 95.62 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.56 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard | Left eye - Week 24 | 96.00 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.58 |
| Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg | Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard | Right eye - baseline | 95.87 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.6 |