Skip to content

Clinical Trial of Iclepertin Effect on Cognition and Functional Capacity in Schizophrenia (CONNEX-1)

A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Trial to Examine the Efficacy and Safety of Iclepertin Once Daily Over 26 Week Treatment Period in Patients With Schizophrenia (CONNEX-1)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04846868
Enrollment
620
Registered
2021-04-15
Start date
2021-09-08
Completion date
2024-10-01
Last updated
2025-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Brief summary

This study is open to adults with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia can affect the way a person thinks, their memory and their mental functioning. Examples include struggling to remember things, or to read a book or pay attention to a movie. Some people have difficulty calculating the right change or planning a trip so that they arrive on time. The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called Iclepertin improves learning and memory in people with schizophrenia. Participants are put into two groups randomly, which means by chance. One group takes Iclepertin tablets and the other group takes placebo tablets. Placebo tablets look like Iclepertin tablets but do not contain any medicine. Participants take a tablet once a day for 26 weeks. In addition, all participants take their normal medication for schizophrenia. During this time, doctors regularly test learning and memory of the participants by use of questionnaires, interviews, and computer tests. The results of the mental ability tests are compared between the groups. Participants are in the study for about 8 months and visit the study site about 14 times. During this time, doctors regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.

Interventions

One 10 milligram (mg) tablet once a day.

DRUGPlacebo

One tablet once a day.

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients must be capable of providing signed and dated written informed consent by date of Visit 1 in accordance with ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and the local legislation prior to the admission to the trial. 2. Male or female patients who are 18-50 years (inclusive) of age at time of consent. 3. Diagnosis of schizophrenia utilizing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) with the following clinical features: * Outpatient, clinically stable and in the residual (non-acute) phase of their illness. * No hospitalization or increase in level of psychiatric care due to worsening of schizophrenia within 12 weeks prior to randomization. * Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score: items P1, P3-P6 ≤ 5 and item P2 and P7 ≤ 4 at Visit 1, and confirmed at Visit 2. 4. Patients should have functional impairment in day-to-day activities such as difficulties following conversation or expressing themselves, difficulties to stay focused, difficulties to remember instructions, what to say or how to get to places, per investigator judgement. 5. Patients maintained on current antipsychotic treatment (minimum 1 and maximum 2 antipsychotics, but clozapine is not allowed) for at least 12 weeks and on current dose for at least 35 days prior to randomization. \-- For patients on two antipsychotics, at least one antipsychotic must be within the approved label dose range. The second antipsychotic must not exceed the maximum daily dose per local label. Note: If the total dose is stable, different dosage forms of the same antipsychotic treatment will be considered as one antipsychotic. 6. Patients with any other concomitant psychoactive medications (except for anticholinergics) need to be maintained on same drug for at least 12 weeks and on current dose/ regimen for at least 35 days prior to randomization. * Maximum daily benzodiazepine load of up to 1 mg lorazepam-equivalent. * For any other psychoactive medications, doses cannot exceed the maximum daily dose per local label. 7. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per Non-Clinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals (ICH M3 (R2)) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria is provided in the protocol. Such methods should be used throughout the trial, and for a period of at least 35 days after last trial drug intake, and the patient must agree to periodic pregnancy testing during participation in the trial. 8. Have a study partner, defined as any person either private or professional who knows the patient well, has been capable of interacting with the patient on regular basis, and preferably consistent throughout the study. * The study partner must interact with the subject a minimum 1 hour per week and, preferably, at least 2 times a week. At least one interaction per week should be in person. * The study partner must have educational achievement of minimum 8th grade. * Professional study partners (e.g. study nurse, social worker etc.) are allowed if not involved in administration of any of the protocol assessments. Further inclusion criteria apply.

Exclusion criteria

1. Participant with current DSM-5 diagnosis other than Schizophrenia, including but not limited to bipolar, schizoaffective, major depressive disorder etc. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) for Psychotic disorders should be used for guidance. 2. Cognitive impairment due to developmental, neurological (e.g., epilepsy, stroke) or other disorders including head trauma, or patients with dementia or epilepsy. 3. Severe movement disorders * Leading to cognitive impairment (e.g. Parkinson dementia), or * Interfering with the efficacy assessments, or * Due to antipsychotic treatment that cannot be controlled with low dose anticholinergic treatment (equal to maximum 1 mg benztropine twice daily). 4. Any suicidal behavior in the past 1-year prior to screening and during the screening period. 5. Suicidal ideation of type 5 in the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (i.e. active suicidal thought with plan and intent) in the past 3 months prior to screening and up to and including Visit 2. \-- Patients with Suicidal Ideation type 4 in the C-SSRS (i.e. active suicidal thought with intent but without specific plan), within 3 months prior to screening and up to and including Visit 2, can be randomized in the study, if assessed and documented by a licensed mental health professional that there is no immediate risk of suicide. 6. History of moderate or severe substance use disorder (other than caffeine and nicotine), as defined in DSM-5 within the last 12 months prior to informed consent. 7. Positive urine drug screen at Visit 1 based on central lab test. 8. Patients who were treated with any of the following within 6 months prior to randomization: * Clozapine * Stimulants (e.g. methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, modafinil) * Ketamine or esketamine * Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or Modified ECT Further

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Overall Composite T-score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 26 Weeks of TreatmentMMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported.MCCB comprises 10 tests, which assess 7 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The larger the MCCB overall composite T-score, the better patient cognition. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on on-treatment periods. On-treatment is defined as the period of first drug administration/first resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP (residual effect period). The change from baseline was analyzed with a MMRM (mixed-effects model for repeated measures) with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was the repeated measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Adjusted Total Time T-score in the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT)MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported.The VRFCAT is a computerized assessment measuring the functional capacity of an individual to perform everyday tasks. It generates a composite score based on the amount of time taken to complete the tasks. The lower the VRFCAT T-score, the better patient's functional capacity. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the T-score in a general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with MMRM with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure.
Change From Screening Visit 1a in Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) Total Score at Week 24MMRM included measurements at Visit 1a (Week -2/Week -1), Week 15, and Week 24. Change from Visit 1a values at Week 24 is reported.The Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) score evaluates how cognitive difficulties impact the daily life of individuals with schizophrenia. It is composed of 28 items on a 5-category Likert scale (1=not at all/not at all hard, 5=very much/very hard), and the total score was derived by calculating the average score of the first 26 items, where higher scores mean a worse patient experience. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with MMRM with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure.
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Score After 26 Weeks of TreatmentMMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported.The SCoRS is an interview based- assessment tool to evaluate the cognitive function of individuals with schizophrenia that incorporates the input of the patient, the caregiver and the interviewer. It is composed of 20 items on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 20 to 140 points, where a higher score indicates a greater cognitive impairment. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies and partner change in SCoR assessment for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure.
Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) StandardAt baseline and at Week 24.The Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 SITA Standard is a diagnostic test to measure visual fields, or perimetry. The Humphrey visual field test measures the entire area of peripheral vision that can be seen while the eye is focused on a central point. During this test, lights of varying intensities appear in different parts of the visual field while the patient's eye is focused on a central spot. The perception of these lights is charted and then compared to results of a healthy eye at the same age of the patient to determine if any damage has occurred. The tests ranks from 0 to 100%, where 0 means no vision and 100 means perfect vision.
Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)At baseline and at Week 24.The central retinal thickness for both eyes was measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography (spectral domain OCT), which evaluates the retinal and sub-retinal structures of both eyes.
Change From Baseline in the T-score of the Number of Correct Responses on Tower of London at Week 26At baseline and at Week 26.The Tower of London (ToL) evaluates executive functioning, reasoning, problem-solving, and goal-directed behavior. It measures the number of correct responses in solving an exercise that consists on moving colored balls to match a target configuration. The higher the ToL T-score, the better patient's cognitive function. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the T-score in a general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline comparing the groups was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including treatment, stratification factor of screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline number of correct responses on Tower of London T-score.

Countries

Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Sweden, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, multinational, 26-week, parallel group trial. Patients could roll-over to safety follow-up extension trial (study 1346-0014). A dedicated ocular sub-study was implemented in several countries participating in the trial to investigate the ocular safety of iclepertin in patients with schizophrenia.

Pre-assignment details

All participants were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the trial. Participants attended a specialist site which ensured that they strictly met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Participants were not to be allocated to a treatment group if any of the entry criteria were violated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Iclepertin 10 mg
Patients with schizophrenia took orally once a day one 10 milligram (mg) tablet of iclepertin.
312
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mg
Patients with schizophrenia took orally once a day one tablet of placebo-matching iclepertin.
307
Total619

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1211
Overall StudyBurden of study procedures11
Overall StudyChange of residence23
Overall StudyNo reason available25
Overall StudyNot treated01
Overall StudyOther reason listed2010
Overall StudyPerceived lack of efficacy32
Overall StudyProtocol deviation62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIclepertin 10 mgPlacebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgTotal
Age, Continuous34.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
33.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
34.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
123 Participants123 Participants246 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
189 Participants184 Participants373 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) overall composite T-score28.6 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
28.8 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
28.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
53 Participants63 Participants116 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
88 Participants97 Participants185 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants19 Participants40 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
139 Participants122 Participants261 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
107 Participants104 Participants211 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
205 Participants203 Participants408 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 3121 / 307
other
Total, other adverse events
81 / 31291 / 307
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 31216 / 307

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Overall Composite T-score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 26 Weeks of Treatment

MCCB comprises 10 tests, which assess 7 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The larger the MCCB overall composite T-score, the better patient cognition. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on on-treatment periods. On-treatment is defined as the period of first drug administration/first resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP (residual effect period). The change from baseline was analyzed with a MMRM (mixed-effects model for repeated measures) with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was the repeated measure.

Time frame: MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported.

Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iclepertin 10 mgChange From Baseline in Overall Composite T-score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 26 Weeks of Treatment2.283 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3094
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgChange From Baseline in Overall Composite T-score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 26 Weeks of Treatment2.22 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3065
Comparison: MMRM, including the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure to model the within-patient measurements.p-value: 0.885495% CI: [-0.793, 0.918]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the T-score of the Number of Correct Responses on Tower of London at Week 26

The Tower of London (ToL) evaluates executive functioning, reasoning, problem-solving, and goal-directed behavior. It measures the number of correct responses in solving an exercise that consists on moving colored balls to match a target configuration. The higher the ToL T-score, the better patient's cognitive function. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the T-score in a general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline comparing the groups was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including treatment, stratification factor of screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline number of correct responses on Tower of London T-score.

Time frame: At baseline and at Week 26.

Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis of this endpoint according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iclepertin 10 mgChange From Baseline in the T-score of the Number of Correct Responses on Tower of London at Week 261.103 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6547
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgChange From Baseline in the T-score of the Number of Correct Responses on Tower of London at Week 260.475 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6477
Comparison: ANCOVA model including treatment, stratification factor of screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline number of correct responses on Tower of London T-score.p-value: 0.495695% CI: [-1.181, 2.437]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Screening Visit 1a in Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) Total Score at Week 24

The Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) score evaluates how cognitive difficulties impact the daily life of individuals with schizophrenia. It is composed of 28 items on a 5-category Likert scale (1=not at all/not at all hard, 5=very much/very hard), and the total score was derived by calculating the average score of the first 26 items, where higher scores mean a worse patient experience. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with MMRM with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure.

Time frame: MMRM included measurements at Visit 1a (Week -2/Week -1), Week 15, and Week 24. Change from Visit 1a values at Week 24 is reported.

Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis of this endpoint according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iclepertin 10 mgChange From Screening Visit 1a in Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) Total Score at Week 24-0.258 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0317
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgChange From Screening Visit 1a in Patient Reported Experience of Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia (PRECIS) Total Score at Week 24-0.305 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0316
Comparison: MMRM including the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-patient measurements.p-value: 0.290295% CI: [-0.041, 0.135]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Score After 26 Weeks of Treatment

The SCoRS is an interview based- assessment tool to evaluate the cognitive function of individuals with schizophrenia that incorporates the input of the patient, the caregiver and the interviewer. It is composed of 20 items on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 20 to 140 points, where a higher score indicates a greater cognitive impairment. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies and partner change in SCoR assessment for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure.

Time frame: MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported.

Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis of this endpoint according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iclepertin 10 mgKey Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Score After 26 Weeks of Treatment-5.246 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.415
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgKey Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Score After 26 Weeks of Treatment-5.480 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.414
Comparison: MMRM including the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-patient measurements.p-value: 0.690295% CI: [-0.918, 1.386]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Adjusted Total Time T-score in the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT)

The VRFCAT is a computerized assessment measuring the functional capacity of an individual to perform everyday tasks. It generates a composite score based on the amount of time taken to complete the tasks. The lower the VRFCAT T-score, the better patient's functional capacity. A mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 reflects the T-score in a general population. The estimated treatment effect included the effect of any concomitant therapies for all randomized patients on-treatment. On-treatment is defined as the period of 1st drug administration/1st resumed dose after interruption until last drug administration + REP. The change from baseline was analyzed with MMRM with the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure.

Time frame: MMRM included measurements at baseline, Week 12, and Week 26. Change from baseline values at Week 26 is reported.

Population: Randomized set: all patients randomized into the trial, regardless of whether a patient was treated with trial medication. Patients on an off-treatment period due to temporary treatment discontinuation or early permanent treatment discontinuation were excluded from the analysis of this endpoint according to the strategy to handle intercurrent events defined in the statistical analysis plan. One patient was randomized in error and discontinued from the trial before the start of trial medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Iclepertin 10 mgKey Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Adjusted Total Time T-score in the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT)3.108 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8089
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgKey Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in the Adjusted Total Time T-score in the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT)3.652 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8018
Comparison: MMRM including the fixed effects: treatment at each visit, stratification factor using the screening MCCB overall composite T-score, and baseline MCCB overall composite T-score at each visit. Visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-patient measurements.p-value: 0.633495% CI: [-2.78, 1.694]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Ocular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

The central retinal thickness for both eyes was measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography (spectral domain OCT), which evaluates the retinal and sub-retinal structures of both eyes.

Time frame: At baseline and at Week 24.

Population: Ocular sub-study set: all treated patients who consented to participate in the ocular sub-study. Only patients with measurements were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Left eye - baseline231.52 micrometerStandard Deviation 26.51
Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Right eye - baseline233.12 micrometerStandard Deviation 31.03
Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Left eye - Week 24237.67 micrometerStandard Deviation 27.32
Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Right eye - Week 24235.46 micrometerStandard Deviation 27.81
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Right eye - Week 24240.49 micrometerStandard Deviation 26.89
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Left eye - baseline230.38 micrometerStandard Deviation 26.64
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Left eye - Week 24236.10 micrometerStandard Deviation 25.96
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Central Retinal Thickness as Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)Right eye - baseline235.00 micrometerStandard Deviation 25.45
Secondary

Ocular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard

The Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 SITA Standard is a diagnostic test to measure visual fields, or perimetry. The Humphrey visual field test measures the entire area of peripheral vision that can be seen while the eye is focused on a central point. During this test, lights of varying intensities appear in different parts of the visual field while the patient's eye is focused on a central spot. The perception of these lights is charted and then compared to results of a healthy eye at the same age of the patient to determine if any damage has occurred. The tests ranks from 0 to 100%, where 0 means no vision and 100 means perfect vision.

Time frame: At baseline and at Week 24.

Population: Ocular sub-study set: all treated patients who consented to participate in the ocular sub-study. Only patients with measurements were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) StandardLeft eye - baseline93.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.82
Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) StandardRight eye - baseline95.87 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) StandardLeft eye - Week 2494.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.69
Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) StandardRight eye - Week 2495.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.69
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) StandardRight eye - Week 2495.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.69
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) StandardLeft eye - baseline95.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.56
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) StandardLeft eye - Week 2496.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.58
Placebo-matching Iclepertin 10 mgOcular Safety Sub-study: Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) StandardRight eye - baseline95.87 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026