Skip to content

Two is Better Than One: A Novel Venous Access System for Intermittent Apheresis

Two is Better Than One: A Novel Venous Access System for Intermittent Apheresis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04846374
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-04-15
Start date
2021-05-26
Completion date
2023-04-14
Last updated
2023-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apheresis

Brief summary

Purpose: To describe a novel configuration of venous access for the performance of intermittent apheresis. Participants: 20 participants at UNC who were referred for change from a vortex port to a powerflow port. Procedures (methods): Placement of one of two configurations of the powerflow port and follow up visits between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023.

Interventions

DEVICEPowerPort

The study will compare pheresis sessions with the old system versus pheresis sessions with one of two new configurations.

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Over the age of 18 years of age. * Referred for change from a vortex port to a powerflow port. * Previously placed or scheduled placement of one of two configurations of the PowerFlow port

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to read and understand English. * Unable to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Flow Rate1 year following new port configuration placementThe study will compare mean change flow rate for pheresis sessions with the old system versus pheresis sessions with one of two new configurations by averaging the flow rate for up to 5 sessions using the new port configuration.
Change in Procedure Time1 year following new port configuration placementThe study will compare mean change in procedure time for pheresis sessions with the old system versus pheresis sessions with one of two new configurations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Use of Tissue Plasminogen Activator1 year following new port configuration placementThe study will compare mean change in use of tissue plasminogen activator for pheresis sessions with the old system versus pheresis sessions with one of two new configurations.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026