Skip to content

A Study of the Change in Early and Sustained Pain Control in Axial Spondylarthritis in Adult Participants Receiving Upadacitinib

Real World Effectiveness of Upadacitinib on Early and Sustained Pain Control in Axial Spondylarthritis (UPSTAND)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04846244
Acronym
UPSTAND
Enrollment
708
Registered
2021-04-15
Start date
2021-04-30
Completion date
2025-03-24
Last updated
2026-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Axial Spondylarthritis (axSpA)

Keywords

Axial Spondylarthritis (axSpA), Upadacitinib, RINVOQ

Brief summary

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease primarily affecting the axial skeleton. The most frequent axSpA symptom is chronic, often inflammatory back pain (IBP) that might be difficult to distinguish from other causes of chronic back pain (CBP). Many participants report persistent pain, including back pain, which impacts disease activity and quality of life including creating burdens such as sleep disturbance, social isolation, loss of productivity, as well as anxiety and depression. This study will assess the real-world effectiveness of upadacitinib on early and sustained pain control, and the association between pain and clinical/patient-reported outcomes in axSpA participants. Upadacitinib is being developed for the treatment of axSpA. Approximately 650 adult participants with active-axSpA will be enrolled across approximately 19 countries in Europe, North America, South America, and Asia-Pacific. Participants will receive oral upadacitinib tablets as prescribed by the physician prior to enrolling in this study in accordance with the terms of the local marketing authorization and professional and reimbursement guidelines with regards to dose, population and indication. Participants will be followed for 12 months. There may be a higher burden for participants in this study compared to usual standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits per routine clinical practice. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects, and questionnaires.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of Axial Spondylarthritis (axSpA) according to the ASAS criteria. * Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score \>= 4 at Baseline. * Total back pain score \>= 4 at Baseline. * Inadequate response to at least two nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over an at least 4-week period in total at maximum recommended or tolerated doses, or participant has an intolerance to contraindication for NSAIDs as defined by the investigator. * Upadacitinib prescribed in accordance with the applicable approved label and local regulatory and reimbursement policies.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. * Participants demonstrating active symptoms of fibromyalgia as per clinical diagnosis. * Participation in a clinical trial of an investigational drug, concurrently or within the last 30 days. * Unwillingness or inability to comply with the study requirements, including completion of patient reported outcome questionnaires. * Participants who cannot be treated with upadacitinib according to the applicable approved label (e.g., contraindications). * Vulnerable or protected adult patients with lack of capability to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants with a Total Spinal Pain Score < 4 and >= 2 Unit (0 - 10) ImprovementBaseline (Week 0) to Week 12Total spinal pain consists of the mean of two 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) questions: total back pain during the previous week and nocturnal back pain during the previous week.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Total Spinal Pain < 4 Among Participants Who Achieved Total Spinal Pain < 4 and >= 2 unit (0 - 10) Improvement from Baseline at Week 12Week 52Total spinal pain score consists of the mean of two 0-10 NRS questions: total back pain during the previous week and nocturnal back pain during the previous week.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, France, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Kuwait, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORABBVIE INC.

AbbVie

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 3, 2026