Skip to content

Pediatric Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification

Pediatric Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04844723
Acronym
PeDiAC
Enrollment
809
Registered
2021-04-14
Start date
2021-04-12
Completion date
2022-08-03
Last updated
2022-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Complication of Anesthesia, Airway Management, Anesthesia, Intubation;Difficult, Laryngoscopy

Keywords

Children, Airway management, Videolaryngoscopy, Endotracheal Intubation, Difficult Intubation

Brief summary

The study's primary aim is to develop and validate a multivariable diagnostic model for the prediction of difficult videolaryngoscopy (the 'PeDiAC classification') in children undergoing general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. The secondary aim is to compare the diagnostic performance of the PeDiAC-classification with the Cormack-Lehane classification.

Detailed description

Difficult tracheal intubation is one of the major reasons for anesthesia-related adverse events. Videolaryngoscopy has become an important part of the anesthesiology standard of care for difficult airway management in the past decades. This is especially relevant in children, as their airway anatomy differs greatly from adults because they are likely incapable of tolerating brief apneic episodes. Still, medical preconditions and procedural and technical factors related to difficult videolaryngoscopy have not been broadly investigated and not fully been understood. The primary aim of the PeDiAC study is to develop and validate a multivariable diagnostic model for the classification of difficult videolaryngoscopy (the 'PeDiAC classification') in children undergoing general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Study planning and conduction are in accordance with the TRIPOD 'Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis' statement. The secondary aim is to compare the diagnostic performance of the PeDiAC-classification with the Cormack-Lehane classification, which is the current clinical standard for assessing intubation via direct laryngoscopy. We conduct a prospective observational study that will include approximately 800 pediatric patients within one year scheduling for tracheal intubation. Patients with age below 18 years will be considered to be eligible for inclusion. Procedural and surgical data, as well as medical preconditions, will be assessed systematically. After tracheal intubation, performed by the responsible anesthetist, the intubation process will be rated by the responsible anesthetist and an additional independent observer, and detailed information regarding procedural and technical factors related to videolaryngoscopy will be documented. All sampled independent variables will be considered to be potential candidate predictors for the multivariable regression model.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia with tracheal intubation in the study center. * Informed consent obtained * Age \< 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Anesthetist prefers conventional laryngoscopy * Indication for intubation via a bronchoscope or awake intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation1 hourRating by the responsible anesthetist

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First pass success rate1 hourPercentage of successful intubations with one attempt
Overall success rate with the first-choice technique1 hourPercentage of successful intubations without transition to another technique
Change of airway technique1 hourTransition to a different technique, i.e. flexible bronchoscopy, surgical airway, supraglottic airway as clinically assessed (Yes/No)
Best glottic view1 hourBest view on the larynx obtained during laryngoscopy assessed by Cormack/Lehane classification (grade I to IV)
Time to best view1 hourTime until optimal view conditions during laryngoscopy
Intubation time1 hourTime until successful tracheal intubation
Intubation difficulty, ease of intubation and quality of visualisation1 hourSubjective ratings on visual analogue scales (0 to 100 with 0 being the best)
Number of attempts1 hourTotal number of laryngoscopy and intubation attempts until airway established
Post-intubation recommendation for an anesthesia alert cart1 hourRecommendation of the responsible anesthetist (yes/no)
Post-intubation diagnosis of 'difficult intubation'1 hourRating of the responsible anesthetist
Airway-related adverse events1 hourLaryngospasm, bronchospasm, larynx trauma, airway trauma, soft tissue trauma, oral bleeding, edema, dental damage, corticosteroid application, accidental esophageal intubation, aspiration, hypotension or hypoxia
Difficult bag-mask ventilation1 hourAs clinically assessed (yes/no) by the responsible anesthetist
Lowest oxygen saturation1 hourMeasured with pulsoxymetry during anesthesia
Hypercapnia1 hourMeasured endtidal carbon dioxide after successful intubation
Post-intubation recommendation for an intubation method1 hourRequirement of recommendation for further intubations of the responsible anesthetist

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026