Skip to content

Using Mini Program for Self-management VS Conventional Pharmaceutical Care for Cancer Pain

Comparison of Cancer Pain Patients With or Without Mini Program

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04844645
Enrollment
200
Registered
2021-04-14
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2021-06-01
Last updated
2021-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Pain

Keywords

mini program, self management, cancer pain

Brief summary

With the existing medical system and insufficient medical resources in China, we developed a mini program. a pain management mini app can be useful and appreciated by patients and health care professionals, making it a good choice for the management of cancer pain in our country . our study want to develop and test the mini program for pain management among Chinese cancer patients in or discharged from hospital treatment.

Detailed description

Healthcare interventions delivered via personal mobile device have been shown to be acceptable to users, who have identified benefits such as convenience, access to personalized information, greater awareness of own health. Integrating mini program into the cancer pain care may be an effective strategy to improve cancer pain patients self-management. To design, construct, and test the mini program in patients managing cancer pain, evaluate the total remission rate of pain and the improvement in medicine compliance to improve pain management for cancer pain patients, and assess patient acceptance of the mini program.

Interventions

To design, construct, and test the mini program in patients managing cancer pain

conventional pharmaceutical care

Sponsors

Fujian Cancer Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The experiment involved two groups: a mini program trial group and a control group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 years or older; * Be able to read Chinese and use a mobile phone; * Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumor; * Diagnosed chronic cancer pain * Could understand the study process and evaluation, agreed to participate in the trial, and signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Illiterate person; * Incompetence; * Inability to complete the pain assessment; * Participation in any other therapies or other study protocols that may have an impact on pain intensity, which were the main outcomes of this study;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain scoreChange from baseline at four weeks after dischargeComparison of pain score of cancer pain patients with or without mini program. Pain score will be assessed by using numeric rating scale (NRS). An NRS allows a person to describe the intensity of his/her pain as a number usually ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means pain as bad as it could be.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in medication adherenceChange from baseline at four weeks after dischargeThe investigators will measure the change in medication adherence via Morisky Scale. Morisky Scale contains 4 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 4 with lower scores indicating higher adherence.
Incidence of adverse eventsUp to four weeks after dischargeAdverse events will be assessed throughout the study according the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Number of subjects who experienced an adverse event in this study is presented.
Change in quality of lifeChange from baseline at four weeks after dischargeComparison of quality of life of cancer pain patients with or without mini program. Quality of life is assessed using EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D).

Contacts

Primary ContactQiuLing Zhao
qlzhao8@163.com0591-83660063

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026