Skip to content

An Extension Study of TAK-664 for Japanese People With Primary Immunodeficiency Disease

A Phase 3, Open-label, Non-controlled, Multi-dose, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of IGSC, 20% in Japanese Subjects With Primary Immunodeficiency Disease (PID)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04842643
Enrollment
12
Registered
2021-04-13
Start date
2021-04-27
Completion date
2024-04-25
Last updated
2025-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Immunodeficiency Disease

Brief summary

This study is an extension study for participants with primary immunodeficiency disorders who were previously treated with IGSC, 20% in the TAK-664-3001 study. They must have completed that study or be about to complete it before joining this study. Participants will continue treatment with IGCS, 20% in this study. The main aim of this study is to check for side effects from long-term treatment with IGSC, 20% . This medicine is not yet licensed in Japan, so participants will be treated with IGSC, 20% until it becomes commercially available.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIGSC 20% infusion

IGSC 20% infusion,

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participant has completed or is about to complete Takeda Clinical Study TAK-664-3001. A participant is considered to have completed Study TAK-664-3001 successfully if they fulfill the following criterion: Completed Epoch 2, in which IGSC, 20% is administered weekly (completion of Epoch 3, in which IGSC, 20% is administered biweekly, is not mandatory for participation in TAK-664-3002 study). 2. Written informed consent is obtained from either the Participant or the Participant's legally authorized representative prior to any study-related procedures and study product administration. 3. Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Participant has developed a new serious medical condition during participation in Study TAK-664-3001 such that the Participant's safety or medical care would be impacted by participation in the extension study TAK-664-3002. 2. Participant is scheduled to participate in another non-Takeda clinical study involving an Investigational Product or device-used-in-clinical-trial in the course of this study. 3. If a female of childbearing potential, Participant is pregnant or has a negative pregnancy test but does not agree to employ adequate birth control measures for the duration of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Non-serious TEAEsFrom the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-doseTEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) with onset after date-time of first dose of study drug (intravenous immunoglobulin \[IGIV\] or IGSC), or medical conditions present prior to the start of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) but increased in severity or relationship after date-time of first dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC). A serious TEAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important.
Number of Participants With Drug-related and Non-related TEAEsFrom the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-doseTEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) with onset after date-time of first dose of study drug (intravenous immunoglobulin \[IGIV\] or IGSC), or medical conditions present prior to the start of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) but increased in severity or relationship after date-time of first dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC). Any TEAE that was recorded by the investigator as probably related or possibly related to study drug was considered as study drug related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered as unrelated AE.
Number of Participants With Severe, Local and Systemic TEAEsFrom the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-doseA severe TEAE was an AE that caused considerable interference with the participant's usual activities. Local TEAEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term administration site reactions or contained the phrase injection site or infusion site. Systemic TEAEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Higher Level Group Term administration site reactions and did not contain the phrase injection site or infusion site.
Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Premature Discontinuation From Study and Infusion-associated TEAEsFrom the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-doseInfusion associated TEAEs were defined as any TEAE that began during study drug infusion or within 72 hours of completion of study drug infusion. TEAEs leading to premature discontinuation from study and infusion-associated TEAEs were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Days Participants Not Able to Attend School or Work to Perform Normal Daily Activities Due to Illness/InfectionFrom first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)Number of days not able to attend school or work to perform normal daily activities due to illness/infection are standardized per year (365.25 days). Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.
Number of Days Participants on AntibioticsFrom first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)Number of days on antibiotics was defined as the number of days those antibiotics were taken as concomitant medications and was standardized to per year (365.25 days). Number of days participants on antibiotics were reported. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.
Number of Hospitalizations Due to Illness or InfectionFrom first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)Number of hospitalizations were standardized to per year (365.25 days). Hospitalizations were measured by asking participants to report the number of nights they have stayed overnight in the hospital during the year, for something related to their own health. Number of hospitalizations due to illness or infection were reported. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.
Serum Trough Levels of Total Immune Globulin G (IgG) and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Weekly Administration of IGSC, 20%At end of treatment in the current extension study TAK-664-3002 (i.e. 3 years)Serum trough levels of total IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 antibodies subclasses were determined by using standard assay methods.
Number of Acute Physician Visits Due to Illness/InfectionFrom first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)Number of acute physician visits is standardized to per year (365.25 days). Number of acute (urgent or unscheduled) physician visits due to illness/infection were reported. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.
Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFrom the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-doseTreatment preference questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess participant's preference towards the administration of new IGSC therapy. There are 4-items on the questionnaire, which investigate a participant's preference on the clinic/hospital/home setting of receiving the immunoglobulin therapy, the participant's rating on the frequency and method of administration, and the participant's preference to continue receiving the IGSC treatment. For First question Before participation in the trial(s), where did you receive your immunoglobulin therapy participants were allowed to select multiple answers for options (At the hospital; At home; Other) for their treatment. As a result, the sum of responders in the arm IGSC, 20%: \>=14 Years for the first question were higher than the total number of participants analyzed in the category.
Number of Participants With Tolerability Events Related to the Infusion of Study DrugFrom the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-doseAn infusion was considered tolerable if the infusion rate was not reduced, or the infusion was not interrupted or stopped, due to a TEAE related to study drug infusion. A tolerability event was considered to have occurred if an infusion was not tolerable.
Length of Hospital Stay Due to Illness or InfectionFrom first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)Length of hospital stay per stay was standardized to per year (365.25 days). Number of days due to illness or infection were reported. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.
Serum Trough Levels of IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Biweekly Administration of IGSC, 20%At end of treatment in the current extension study TAK-664-3002 (i.e. 3 years)Serum trough levels of IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 antibodies subclasses were determined by using standard assay methods.
Annual Rate of Validated Acute Serious Bacterial Infections (ASBI)From first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)The ASBI rate was calculated as the mean number of acute serious bacterial infections per participants per year. Annual rate of validated acute serious bacterial infections per participant was assessed. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.
Annual Rate of All InfectionsFrom first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)The annual rate of infections was calculated as the mean number of infections per participant per year. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 8 investigative sites in Japan from 27 April 2021 to 25 April 2024.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with primary immunodeficiency disorders who completed core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) were enrolled to receive Immune globulin subcutaneous (IGCS), 20 percent (%) in this current extension study (TAK-664-3002 \[NCT04842643\]). As per planned analysis, the data was collected, analyzed and reported for a single arm only and per dose level wise data was not collected in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IGSC, 20%
Participants who completed Epoch 2 of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108), received between 50 to 200 mg/kg of IGSC infusion, 20% infusion once a week (Epoch 2 regimen) and 100 to 400 mg/kg of IGSC infusion, 20% biweekly (Epoch 3 regimen) until the study drug becomes commercially available.
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyOther1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIGSC, 20%
Age, Continuous36.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.68
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Drug-related and Non-related TEAEs

TEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) with onset after date-time of first dose of study drug (intravenous immunoglobulin \[IGIV\] or IGSC), or medical conditions present prior to the start of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) but increased in severity or relationship after date-time of first dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC). Any TEAE that was recorded by the investigator as probably related or possibly related to study drug was considered as study drug related AE, and any AE recorded as unlikely related or not related was considered as unrelated AE.

Time frame: From the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-dose

Population: All-Treated Set consisted of all enrolled participants who received IGSC, 20% administration at least once in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Drug-related and Non-related TEAEsDrug-related TEAEs9 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Drug-related and Non-related TEAEsNon-related TEAEs12 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Severe, Local and Systemic TEAEs

A severe TEAE was an AE that caused considerable interference with the participant's usual activities. Local TEAEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term administration site reactions or contained the phrase injection site or infusion site. Systemic TEAEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Higher Level Group Term administration site reactions and did not contain the phrase injection site or infusion site.

Time frame: From the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-dose

Population: All-Treated Set consisted of all enrolled participants who received IGSC, 20% administration at least once in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Severe, Local and Systemic TEAEsSevere TEAEs3 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Severe, Local and Systemic TEAEsLocal TEAEs8 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Severe, Local and Systemic TEAEsSystemic TEAEs12 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Premature Discontinuation From Study and Infusion-associated TEAEs

Infusion associated TEAEs were defined as any TEAE that began during study drug infusion or within 72 hours of completion of study drug infusion. TEAEs leading to premature discontinuation from study and infusion-associated TEAEs were reported.

Time frame: From the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-dose

Population: All-Treated Set consisted of all enrolled participants who received IGSC, 20% administration at least once in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Premature Discontinuation From Study and Infusion-associated TEAEsTEAEs Leading to Premature Discontinuation0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Premature Discontinuation From Study and Infusion-associated TEAEsInfusion-associated TEAEs12 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Non-serious TEAEs

TEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) with onset after date-time of first dose of study drug (intravenous immunoglobulin \[IGIV\] or IGSC), or medical conditions present prior to the start of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) but increased in severity or relationship after date-time of first dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC). A serious TEAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important.

Time frame: From the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-dose

Population: All-Treated Set consisted of all enrolled participants who received IGSC, 20% administration at least once in this study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Non-serious TEAEsTEAEs12 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Non-serious TEAEsSerious TEAEs3 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Non-serious TEAEsNon-serious TEAEs12 Participants
Secondary

Annual Rate of All Infections

The annual rate of infections was calculated as the mean number of infections per participant per year. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Population: The Core Study All-Treated Set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) in TAK-664-3001.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IGSC, 20%Annual Rate of All Infections1.42 infections per yearStandard Deviation 1.119
Secondary

Annual Rate of Validated Acute Serious Bacterial Infections (ASBI)

The ASBI rate was calculated as the mean number of acute serious bacterial infections per participants per year. Annual rate of validated acute serious bacterial infections per participant was assessed. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Population: The Core Study All-Treated Set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) in TAK-664-3001.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IGSC, 20%Annual Rate of Validated Acute Serious Bacterial Infections (ASBI)0.00 infections per yearStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay Due to Illness or Infection

Length of hospital stay per stay was standardized to per year (365.25 days). Number of days due to illness or infection were reported. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Population: The Core Study All-Treated Set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) in TAK-664-3001. Here overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
IGSC, 20%Length of Hospital Stay Due to Illness or Infection0.00 days
Secondary

Number of Acute Physician Visits Due to Illness/Infection

Number of acute physician visits is standardized to per year (365.25 days). Number of acute (urgent or unscheduled) physician visits due to illness/infection were reported. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Population: The Core Study All-Treated Set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) in TAK-664-3001.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IGSC, 20%Number of Acute Physician Visits Due to Illness/Infection2.66 visits per yearStandard Deviation 2.652
Secondary

Number of Days Participants Not Able to Attend School or Work to Perform Normal Daily Activities Due to Illness/Infection

Number of days not able to attend school or work to perform normal daily activities due to illness/infection are standardized per year (365.25 days). Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Population: The Core Study All-Treated Set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) in TAK-664-3001.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
IGSC, 20%Number of Days Participants Not Able to Attend School or Work to Perform Normal Daily Activities Due to Illness/Infection1.91 days
Secondary

Number of Days Participants on Antibiotics

Number of days on antibiotics was defined as the number of days those antibiotics were taken as concomitant medications and was standardized to per year (365.25 days). Number of days participants on antibiotics were reported. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Population: The Core Study All-Treated Set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) in TAK-664-3001.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
IGSC, 20%Number of Days Participants on Antibiotics2.55 days
Secondary

Number of Hospitalizations Due to Illness or Infection

Number of hospitalizations were standardized to per year (365.25 days). Hospitalizations were measured by asking participants to report the number of nights they have stayed overnight in the hospital during the year, for something related to their own health. Number of hospitalizations due to illness or infection were reported. Reported timeframe included timeframe of core study TAK-664-3001 (NCT04346108) (Max approximately 1.5 year) and of current extension study (Max approximately 3 years) as data of this outcome measure was collected from first dose of core study to end of current extension study and the data is presented for participants who entered in current study from core study as per plan.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug in core study TAK-664-3001 up to end of current extension study TAK-664-3002 (up to approximately 4.5 years)

Population: The Core Study All-Treated Set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC) in TAK-664-3001.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IGSC, 20%Number of Hospitalizations Due to Illness or Infection0.21 hospitalizationStandard Deviation 0.37
Secondary

Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference Questionnaire

Treatment preference questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess participant's preference towards the administration of new IGSC therapy. There are 4-items on the questionnaire, which investigate a participant's preference on the clinic/hospital/home setting of receiving the immunoglobulin therapy, the participant's rating on the frequency and method of administration, and the participant's preference to continue receiving the IGSC treatment. For First question Before participation in the trial(s), where did you receive your immunoglobulin therapy participants were allowed to select multiple answers for options (At the hospital; At home; Other) for their treatment. As a result, the sum of responders in the arm IGSC, 20%: \>=14 Years for the first question were higher than the total number of participants analyzed in the category.

Time frame: From the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-dose

Population: All-Treated Set consisted of all enrolled participants who received IGSC, 20% administration at least once in this study. As pre-specified in protocol, data was planned to be reported as per age criteria (2-13 years and \>=14 years) for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: No preference0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: Like very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: Like1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: No preference1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: Dislike1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: No preference1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration: Like very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: Like very much2 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration process: Like3 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: Like very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration: No preference0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: Like0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: Like very much1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: No preference0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: Like very much2 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: Like1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: Like1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: No preference0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: Like1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: Dislike very much1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: No preference1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireChoose to continue receiving IGSC: Yes3 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: Like very much1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireChoose to continue receiving IGSC: No0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: Like1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influence decision: Two way needle, to see more variation in volume of chemical solution.0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: Like2 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Can be self-administered at home1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: Dislike1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Easy administration method, easy to use0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: No preference0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Feel relieved0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Fewer side effects. IgG levels stabilized and became easier0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influence decision:.Take time to prepare, clean up, for area affected by needle to recover.0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Less susceptible to infections. Atopic dermatitis improved1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: No answer1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: No preference1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: No more coughing0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: Like very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: The values are stable0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: Like very much1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Time is short0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: Like3 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influence decision: There were no major side effects and stable medical condition0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: Like very much1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireBefore participation in the trial(s), where did you receive your immunoglobulin therapy: At home0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: No preference0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireBefore participation in trial(s), where did you receive your immunoglobulin therapy: At hospital3 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: Like2 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireBefore participation in the trial(s), where did you receive your immunoglobulin therapy: Other0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireWhere do you Prefer to Receive Your Immunoglobulin Therapy: At Hospital1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireWhere do you Prefer to Receive Your Immunoglobulin Therapy: At Home0 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireWhere do you Prefer to Receive Your Immunoglobulin Therapy: No Preference2 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireWhere do you Prefer to Receive Your Immunoglobulin Therapy: At Home6 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireWhere do you Prefer to Receive Your Immunoglobulin Therapy: No Preference2 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: Like very much1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: Like4 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: No preference3 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: Dislike1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe Frequency of Administration: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: Like very much1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: Like5 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: No preference2 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: Dislike1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe number of needlesticks per month: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: Like very much3 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: Like2 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: No preference1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: Dislike3 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireTotal time spent for treatment per month: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: Like very much3 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: Like4 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: No preference1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: Dislike1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe ease of administration: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: Like very much5 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: Like4 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: No preference0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe potential to self-administer: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: Like very much5 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: Like1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: No preference3 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to fit treatment into schedule: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: Like very much4 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: Like3 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: No preference2 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe overall convenience: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: Like very much1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: Like5 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: No preference1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: Dislike2 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireThe amount of time administration takes: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration: Like very much2 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration process: Like4 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration: No preference2 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration: Dislike1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireComplexity of administration: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: Like very much6 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: Like3 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: No preference0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: Dislike very much0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireAbility to self-administer: Dislike0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireChoose to continue receiving IGSC: Yes7 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireChoose to continue receiving IGSC: No2 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influence decision: Two way needle, to see more variation in volume of chemical solution.1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Can be self-administered at home0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Easy administration method, easy to use1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Feel relieved1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Fewer side effects. IgG levels stabilized and became easier1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influence decision:.Take time to prepare, clean up, for area affected by needle to recover.1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Less susceptible to infections. Atopic dermatitis improved0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: No answer0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: No more coughing1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: The values are stable1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influenced decision: Time is short1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireFactor influence decision: There were no major side effects and stable medical condition1 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireBefore participation in the trial(s), where did you receive your immunoglobulin therapy: At home0 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireBefore participation in trial(s), where did you receive your immunoglobulin therapy: At hospital8 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireBefore participation in the trial(s), where did you receive your immunoglobulin therapy: Other4 Participants
IGSC, 20%: >=14 YearsNumber of Participants With Their Response for Treatment Preference QuestionnaireWhere do you Prefer to Receive Your Immunoglobulin Therapy: At Hospital1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Tolerability Events Related to the Infusion of Study Drug

An infusion was considered tolerable if the infusion rate was not reduced, or the infusion was not interrupted or stopped, due to a TEAE related to study drug infusion. A tolerability event was considered to have occurred if an infusion was not tolerable.

Time frame: From the first dose of the study drug in the current extension study TAK-664-3002, up to 3 years post-dose

Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (IGIV or IGSC).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Tolerability Events Related to the Infusion of Study DrugInfusion rate was reduced1 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Tolerability Events Related to the Infusion of Study DrugInfusion was interrupted4 Participants
IGSC, 20%Number of Participants With Tolerability Events Related to the Infusion of Study DrugInfusion was stopped1 Participants
Secondary

Serum Trough Levels of IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Biweekly Administration of IGSC, 20%

Serum trough levels of IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 antibodies subclasses were determined by using standard assay methods.

Time frame: At end of treatment in the current extension study TAK-664-3002 (i.e. 3 years)

Population: All-Treated Set consisted of all enrolled participants who received IGSC, 20% administration at least once in this study. Here overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Biweekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG 23.42 g/L
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Biweekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG 3NA g/L
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Biweekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG 40.250 g/L
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Biweekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG Total8.98 g/L
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Biweekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG 15.36 g/L
Secondary

Serum Trough Levels of Total Immune Globulin G (IgG) and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Weekly Administration of IGSC, 20%

Serum trough levels of total IgG and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 antibodies subclasses were determined by using standard assay methods.

Time frame: At end of treatment in the current extension study TAK-664-3002 (i.e. 3 years)

Population: All-Treated Set consisted of all enrolled participants who received IGSC, 20% administration at least once in this study. Here overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of Total Immune Globulin G (IgG) and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Weekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG 16.14 grams per liter (g/L)
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of Total Immune Globulin G (IgG) and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Weekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG 23.52 grams per liter (g/L)
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of Total Immune Globulin G (IgG) and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Weekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG 3NA grams per liter (g/L)
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of Total Immune Globulin G (IgG) and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Weekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG 40.305 grams per liter (g/L)
IGSC, 20%Serum Trough Levels of Total Immune Globulin G (IgG) and IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 Antibodies Subclasses Following Weekly Administration of IGSC, 20%IgG Total11.0 grams per liter (g/L)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026