Skip to content

The Guidance of Thin Cross- Section of CT in Anatomic Segmentectomy

The Guidance of Thin Cross- Section of CT in Anatomic Segmentectomy With or Without 3-dimensional Computed Tomography Lung Simulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04842578
Enrollment
200
Registered
2021-04-13
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2021-03-30
Last updated
2021-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Segmentectomy, Thin Cross- Section of CT, Three-dimensional-computed Tomography (3D-CT), Video- Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Brief summary

Three-dimensional (3D) simulation of pulmonary vessels and the space between the lesion and adjacent tissues is regarded improving the safety and accuracy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for segmentectomy for ground glass opacity (GGO) in lung. However, not every thoracic surgeon can handle the technique, in addition, the 3D reconstruction originate from the thin CT scan. Actually, the investigators found that, the reading and comprehension of the thin cross- section of CT can guide the accurate anatomic segmentectomy in most situations. The investigators designed a retrospective study to compare the reading of thin cross- section of CT with 3D reconstruction or without 3D reconstruction during the guidance of anatomic segmentectomy.

Interventions

OTHERCross- Section of CT Guided Anatomic Segmentectomy

The anatomic segmentectomy is base on the reading and comprehension of Cross- Section of CT.

OTHER3D simulation Guided Anatomic Segmentectomy

The anatomic segmentectomy is base on the overview of 3D simulation of pulmonary structure.

Sponsors

The Second Hospital of Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Selection criteria for VATS segmentectomy in the present study were as follows: (I) patients with single peripheral GGO lesion considered suspicious for malignancy; (II) the lesion \<2 cm in diameter and with at least one of the followings: (i) pure adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) histology; (ii) nodule has ≥50% ground-glass appearance on high resolution CT; (iii) radiologic surveillance conforms a long doubling time (≥400 days).

Exclusion criteria

(I) patients with insufficient cardiopulmonary function; (II) other contraindication for segmentectomy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
planning time (minutes)from the first time of thin cross- section of CT is presented to the end of surgery, within 7 daysthe planning time for anatomic segmentectomy before surgery, including the time- cost of the decision making and the planning time for surgery
time before surgery (days)from the day of being hospitalized to the day of surgery, within 5 daysdays before surgery after being hospitalized
operation time (minutes)from beginning to the end of surgery, up to 180 minutesthe duration of the operation time
confirmation time during surgery (number)Intraoperativereview time of the 3D reconstruction or the thin cross- section of CT during surgery
air leakage after surgery (days)within 7 days after surgerythe days of air leakage after surgery
the incidence of pneumonia (percentage)within 7 days after surgerythe incidence of pneumonia after surgery
the incidence of atelectasis (percentage)within 7 days after surgerythe incidence of atelectasis after surgery
Intraoperative bleeding (ml)Intraoperativebleeding during anatomic segmentectomy, through the operation, an average of 100 ml
Chest tube duration (days)within 7 days after surgeryChest tube duration after surgery
Postoperative hospital stay (days)within 7 days after surgeryhospital stay after surgery

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026