Skip to content

Feasibility and Impact of a Tele-rehabilitation Program in Patients With Chronic and Non-specific Neck Pain

Feasibility and Impact of a Tele-rehabilitation Program in Patients With Chronic and Non-specific Neck Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04841642
Enrollment
46
Registered
2021-04-12
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2022-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain

Brief summary

Chronic neck pain has a high prevalence in developed countries, being one of the main causes of years lived with disability and deterioration of the quality of life. Telerehabilitation is presented as a resource capable of favoring, with its development and implementation, the transition to a universal and quality health service. The main objective of the study is to assess the change in disability produced by a telerehabilitation program (applied in the intervention group) in patients with chronic and nonspecific neck pain compared to the recommendation of home exercises (control group). The study that will be carried out will be a controlled and randomized clinical trial (ECCA), single-blind, longitudinal and prospective with two groups (intervention group and control group). The main study variables that are intended to be analyzed pre and post intervention are disability, quality of life, pain, adherence, and depression and anxiety. The study will take place between June 2020 and May 2021 in specialized physiotherapy clinics.

Interventions

OTHERMANUAL THERAPY

The investigators will apply manual therapy for ten minutes a week, for 8 weeks, based on cervical mobilizations and suboccipital inhibitions.

OTHERTHERAPEUTIC EXERCISE

The exercises recommendations will be based on a simulation of the exercises in the same session of the manual therapy of each week, helped by the physiotherapist. The access to telerehabilitation will be through a web page, through which patients could see explanatory videos of the exercises as many times as they need.

Sponsors

University of Jaén
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* People between 18 and 65 years of age * Neck pain of more than 3 months of evolution * Access and knowledge in the use of the internet * Complete the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous trauma to the cervical region (such as whiplash) * Neck surgery * Osteoporosis * Arthritis * Cervical radiculopathy associated with externalized cervical hernia * Vertigo or vertebrobasilar insufficiency * Cancer * Vertebral fracture * Fibromyalgia * Cognitive impairment * Psychiatric disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in disabilityBaseline, 8 weeks and 2 month after intervention.Using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). It is made up of 10 items and each item is scored on a 6-point Likert scale (0 to 5), leading to a total score ranging from 0 to 50 (0 to 4 = no disability; 5 to 14 = mild disability; 15 to 24 = moderate disability; 25 to 34 = severe disability; and 35 to 50 = complete disability).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in depression and anxietyBaseline, 8 weeks and 2 month after intervention.Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). It consists of two series of seven questions (a total of 14 items), one represents the anxiety subscale and the other the depression. Each item is valued according to a four-point frequency scale that ranges from 0 to 3 (0 = I always do it; 1 = not so much; 2 = definitely not that much; 3 = not at all).
Changes in KinesiophobiaBaseline, 8 weeks and 2 month after intervention.Using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11), self-report of 17 items that address fear of movement and injury relapse. Four of the items are negatively written and scored inverse (4, 8, 12 and 16). The scores are added together to obtain a total score, with higher values reflecting greater kinesiophobia.
Changes in the health-related quality of lifeBaseline, 8 weeks and 2 month after intervention.Using the Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12). It is made up of a subset of 12 items from the SF-36 (physical function, social function, physical role, emotional role, mental health, vitality, bodily pain and general health), including 1-2 items from each of the 8 scales of the SF-36.
Adherence to treatmentAt 4 and 8 weeks of treatmentUsing a record book of the completion of the treatment program, where the activity carried out will be reflected.
Pressure pain thresholdBaseline, 8 weeks and 2 month after intervention.Using a digital pressure algometer at a speed of 1 kg / cm2 / s perpendicular to the skin surface. The patient will be required to immediately indicate when the sensation of pressure (kg / cm2) becomes a sensation of pain, and thus terminate the compression.
Changes in the pain: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, 8 weeks and 2 month after intervention.Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Each item is scored 0-10 (0= no pain; 10= the major pain that the patient can imagine) yielding a total between 0 and 10.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026