Skip to content

Community Trial in the Cherokee Nation

Community Randomized Trial in the Cherokee Nation: Connect and CMCA for Preventing Drug Misuse Among Older Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04839978
Enrollment
919
Registered
2021-04-09
Start date
2021-09-29
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid Abuse

Keywords

American Indian, Cherokee Nation, Community intervention

Brief summary

The target population is students attending high schools in small rural towns in the 14 counties that partially or fully fall within the Cherokee Nation reservation. Following recruitment of 20 school-based clusters, clusters are allocated to either the intervention condition or delayed-intervention control condition using constrained randomization. Constrained randomization helps to ensure balanced cluster sizes as well as similar levels of risk between the intervention and control at baseline. Study participants include all 10th grade students enrolled in the participating study high schools and students will be followed into the first year after their expected graduation.

Detailed description

The national public health opioid crisis has disproportionately burdened rural White populations, and disproportionately burdened American Indian populations. Therefore, the Cherokee Nation (CN) and Emory University public health scientists have designed an opioid prevention trial to be conducted in at-risk rural communities in the CN (in northeast Oklahoma) with primarily White and American Indian adolescents and young adults. The goal of this study is to implement and evaluate a theory-based, integrated multi-level community intervention designed to prevent the onset and escalation of opioid and other drug misuse. The researchers propose a cluster randomized trial building directly on the success of their most recent previous trial, which demonstrated that the intervention effectively reduced alcohol and other drug use among American Indian and other youth living within the CN. Two distinct intervention approaches-community organizing as implemented in the established Communities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA) intervention protocol, and universal school-based brief intervention and referral as implemented in the established Connect intervention protocol -will be expanded and integrated to further enhance effects in preventing and reducing opioid misuse. The CMCA and Connect interventions were originally designed to target adolescent alcohol use but nevertheless showed significant beneficial effects on use of other drugs, including prescription drug misuse. The proposed study will: (1) further improve the design of the interventions with increased focus on opioids, (2) test the expanded, integrated versions in a cluster randomized trial, and (3) design and test new systems for sustained implementation within existing structures of the Cherokee Nation. Building upon the extant prevention science evidence, this study will respond to a gap in evidence concerning opioid misuse prevention among at-risk adolescents transitioning to young adulthood among American Indian and other rural youth.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALConnect Program

The Connect program includes school-based screening, brief intervention and referral, and will be treated as part of the participating schools' prevention programs. A computer-based screening and brief intervention will be supported by Cherokee Nation Behavioral Health (CNBH) supervised Connect coaches universally, to reduce potential stigma associated with speaking to a Connect coach and to reinforce drug free norms among all students. Follow-up of moderate to high-risk youth will be conducted by a Connect Coach through Zoom, other electronic communication, or in-person visits, with referral to Cherokee Nation or community services if deemed necessary.

BEHAVIORALCommunities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA)

The community-level intervention Communities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA) will involve educating and organizing of adult volunteers and consent will be assumed by their participation. Trainings and tools will be provided, including Family Action Kits, to support local families, community organizations and citizens, including information on national and local opioid and other drug use, evidence-based policies, programs and practices, and how to motivate and create family and local action for drug prevention.

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Sixteen to 20 high schools and surrounding towns within the 14 counties that partially or fully fall within the Cherokee Nation reservation in northeast Oklahoma will be randomly assigned to receive the preventive interventions offered by this study or usual school and community prevention. A total of 800 to 1200 students are expected to enroll from the randomized sites.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Tenth grade students enrolled in the participating high schools

Exclusion criteria

* unable to understand written or verbal English Inclusion criteria for high schools: * Counties that partially or fully fall within the Cherokee Nation reservation * Town population of 3,000 or less * Class size between 30 to 100 students

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Days of Alcohol UseSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)The number of days of alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.
Number of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)The number of days of heavy alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. Heavy alcohol use is defined as having at least four (among young women) or five (among young men) alcoholic drinks within a couple of hours.
Number of Days of Marijuana UseSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)The number of days of marijuana use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.
Number of Days of Opioid MisuseSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)The number of days of opioid drug misuse use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Social Support From Parent/CaregiverSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Social support from parents/caregivers is assessed with 6 items which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.
Social Support From FriendSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Social support from a friend is assessed with 6 items, which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.
Social Support From TeacherSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Social support from a teacher is assessed with 6 items, which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.
Social Support From Other AdultSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Social support from an adult, other than a parent/caregiver or teacher, is assessed with 6 items which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.
Perceived Availability of AlcoholSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Ease or difficulty in accessing alcohol is assessed with 4 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.
Perceived Availability of MarijuanaSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Ease or difficulty in accessing marijuana is assessed with 5 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.
Perceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Ease or difficulty in accessing prescription opioids is assessed with 5 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.
Social Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people drinking alcohol. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval
Social Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people using marijuana. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval.
Social Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people missing prescription opioids. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval.
Self-EfficacySurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Self-efficacy is assessed with 3 items asking how easy or hard it would be for participants to ask for help or refuse alcohol or drugs. Responses given on a 4-point scale, where 1 = very easy and 4 = very hard. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with lower scores indicating increased self-efficacy.
Normative Estimates of Peer Drug UseSurveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)Normative estimates of peer drug use (alcohol, marijuana, prescription opioid misuse) are assessed with 3 items asking about how many of their peers in school used drugs in the past year. Possible responses are 1 = none or almost none, 2 = less than half, 3 = about half, 4 = more than half, and 5 = almost all or all. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher normative estimates of peer drug use.
Proportion of Participants With Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation6 Months Post-GraduationModel predicted proportion of participants with alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. The Least Squares Mean values are limited to the 6-month post-graduation time point while adjusting for baseline use.
Proportion of Participants With Heavy Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation6 Months Post-GraduationModel predicted proportion of participants with heavy alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. Heavy alcohol use is defined as having at least four (among young women) or five (among young men) alcoholic drinks within a couple of hours. The Least Squares Mean values are limited to the 6-month post-graduation time point while adjusting for baseline use.
Proportion of Participants With Marijuana Use 6 Months Post-Graduation6 Months Post-GraduationModel predicted proportion of participants with marijuana use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. The Least Squares Mean values are limited to the 6-month post-graduation time point while adjusting for baseline use.
Number of Participants With Opioid Drug Misuse 6 Months Post-Graduation6 Months Post-GraduationThe number of participants reporting prescription opioid misuse in the past 30 days at the survey administered 6-month post-graduation.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKelli Komro, PhD

Emory University

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 919 participants were enrolled from 20 high schools in the Cherokee Nation Reservation, in Tahlequah, Oklahoma, USA. Participant enrollment began on September 29, 2021 (the day of the Baseline survey) and the assessment at the end of high school (spring of 12th grade) occurred on May 17, 2024. The final study assessment for the 6-months post-graduation time point occurred on December 31, 2024.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Preventive Intervention
Students in schools assigned to the preventive intervention study condition taking part in the Connect school-based prevention program and the community-level Communities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA) intervention.
465
Control Group
Students in schools assigned to the control group did not receive the Connect and CMCA interventions. Schools in the control group received usual school and community prevention and were offered the trial's programs after the end of this three-year study.
454
Total919

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPreventive InterventionTotalControl Group
Age, Continuous15.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
15.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
15.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Participants reporting alcohol use in past 30 days
Alcohol use reported
74 Participants166 Participants92 Participants
Participants reporting alcohol use in past 30 days
Missing response
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Participants reporting heavy alcohol use in past 30 days
Heavy alcohol use reported
43 Participants95 Participants52 Participants
Participants reporting heavy alcohol use in past 30 days
Missing response
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Participants reporting marijuana use in past 30 days
Marijuana use reported
68 Participants136 Participants68 Participants
Participants reporting marijuana use in past 30 days
Missing response
7 Participants16 Participants9 Participants
Participants reporting prescription opioid misuse in past 30 days
Missing response
12 Participants30 Participants18 Participants
Participants reporting prescription opioid misuse in past 30 days
Prescription opioid misuse reported
21 Participants38 Participants17 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian and White
102 Participants205 Participants103 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian Only
130 Participants266 Participants136 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
55 Participants116 Participants61 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Only
174 Participants323 Participants149 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
465 Participants919 Participants454 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Decline to answer
20 Participants35 Participants15 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
230 Participants444 Participants214 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
215 Participants437 Participants222 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Missing
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4650 / 454
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 4650 / 454
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4650 / 454

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Days of Alcohol Use

The number of days of alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade0.70 daysStandard Error 0.16
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade0.68 daysStandard Error 0.16
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade0.69 daysStandard Error 0.15
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade0.66 daysStandard Error 0.17
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade0.71 daysStandard Error 0.17
Control GroupNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.21 daysStandard Error 0.28
Control GroupNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade0.58 daysStandard Error 0.14
Control GroupNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade0.70 daysStandard Error 0.16
Control GroupNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade0.84 daysStandard Error 0.18
Control GroupNumber of Days of Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade1.01 daysStandard Error 0.22
Primary

Number of Days of Heavy Alcohol Use

The number of days of heavy alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. Heavy alcohol use is defined as having at least four (among young women) or five (among young men) alcoholic drinks within a couple of hours.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade0.50 daysStandard Error 0.1
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade0.47 daysStandard Error 0.1
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade0.48 daysStandard Error 0.1
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade0.46 daysStandard Error 0.11
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade0.51 daysStandard Error 0.11
Control GroupNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade0.90 daysStandard Error 0.2
Control GroupNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade0.30 daysStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade0.40 daysStandard Error 0.09
Control GroupNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade0.52 daysStandard Error 0.11
Control GroupNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade0.68 daysStandard Error 0.14
Primary

Number of Days of Marijuana Use

The number of days of marijuana use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade1.50 daysStandard Error 0.18
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade1.44 daysStandard Error 0.19
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade1.46 daysStandard Error 0.18
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.41 daysStandard Error 0.22
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade1.53 daysStandard Error 0.2
Control GroupNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.51 daysStandard Error 0.35
Control GroupNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade1.71 daysStandard Error 0.22
Control GroupNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade1.88 daysStandard Error 0.21
Control GroupNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.07 daysStandard Error 0.23
Control GroupNumber of Days of Marijuana UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.28 daysStandard Error 0.27
Primary

Number of Days of Opioid Misuse

The number of days of opioid drug misuse use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade0.15 daysStandard Error 0.05
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade0.12 daysStandard Error 0.05
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade0.19 daysStandard Error 0.07
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade0.10 daysStandard Error 0.05
Preventive InterventionNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade0.24 daysStandard Error 0.09
Control GroupNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade0.23 daysStandard Error 0.1
Control GroupNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade0.07 daysStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade0.10 daysStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade0.17 daysStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupNumber of Days of Opioid MisuseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade0.13 daysStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Normative Estimates of Peer Drug Use

Normative estimates of peer drug use (alcohol, marijuana, prescription opioid misuse) are assessed with 3 items asking about how many of their peers in school used drugs in the past year. Possible responses are 1 = none or almost none, 2 = less than half, 3 = about half, 4 = more than half, and 5 = almost all or all. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher normative estimates of peer drug use.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Preventive InterventionNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Preventive InterventionNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Preventive InterventionNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Preventive InterventionNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Control GroupNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Control GroupNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Control GroupNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Control GroupNormative Estimates of Peer Drug UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Secondary

Number of Days of Alcohol Use

The number of days of alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Time frame: 6 Months Post-Graduation

Secondary

Number of Days of Heavy Alcohol Use

The number of days of heavy alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. Heavy alcohol use is defined as having at least four (among young women) or five (among young men) alcoholic drinks within a couple of hours.

Time frame: 6 Months Post-Graduation

Secondary

Number of Days of Marijuana Use

The number of days of marijuana use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Time frame: 6 Months Post-Graduation

Secondary

Number of Days of Opioid Drug Misuse

The number of days of prescription opioid misuse in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Time frame: 6 Months Post-Graduation

Secondary

Perceived Availability of Alcohol

Ease or difficulty in accessing alcohol is assessed with 4 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.42 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of AlcoholBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.37 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Secondary

Perceived Availability of Marijuana

Ease or difficulty in accessing marijuana is assessed with 5 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.12 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Control GroupPerceived Availability of MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Secondary

Perceived Availability of Prescription Opioids

Ease or difficulty in accessing prescription opioids is assessed with 5 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade1.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade1.48 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade1.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Preventive InterventionPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade1.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade1.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade1.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade1.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupPerceived Availability of Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade1.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Secondary

Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy is assessed with 3 items asking how easy or hard it would be for participants to ask for help or refuse alcohol or drugs. Responses given on a 4-point scale, where 1 = very easy and 4 = very hard. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with lower scores indicating increased self-efficacy.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade1.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Preventive InterventionSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade1.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade1.57 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Preventive InterventionSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Preventive InterventionSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade1.59 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.60 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade1.65 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade1.64 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade1.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Control GroupSelf-EfficacyBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade1.62 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Social Normative Beliefs About Alcohol Use

Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people drinking alcohol. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.99 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol UseBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.00 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Social Normative Beliefs About Marijuana

Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people using marijuana. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About MarijuanaBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Social Normative Beliefs About Prescription Opioids

Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people missing prescription opioids. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.57 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Control GroupSocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription OpioidsBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Social Support From Friend

Social support from a friend is assessed with 6 items, which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.40 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From FriendBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.43 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Social Support From Other Adult

Social support from an adult, other than a parent/caregiver or teacher, is assessed with 6 items which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Control GroupSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Control GroupSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Control GroupSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupSocial Support From Other AdultBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.13 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Social Support From Parent/Caregiver

Social support from parents/caregivers is assessed with 6 items which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.47 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.48 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From Parent/CaregiverBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Social Support From Teacher

Social support from a teacher is assessed with 6 items, which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the baseline survey as the overall number of participants analyzed. The least squares means are calculated adjusting for repeated measures with responses from all participants in the baseline population. The number of participants at each time point represents the students who completed subsequent surveys at the indicated time points. Some survey items were left unanswered by students.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.33 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Preventive InterventionSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Control GroupSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.19 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Control GroupSocial Support From TeacherBaseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.03

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026