Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Selective Digestive Decontamination in the ICU With High Rates of Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria

Efficacy and Safety of Selective Digestive Decontamination in the ICU With Rates of Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04839653
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-04-09
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2021-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bloodstream Infection, Critical Illness, Pneumonia, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Tract Infections, Sepsis

Keywords

Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia, Selective Digestive Decontamination, Secondary Infections, Infection prophylaxis, Bloodstream Infection

Brief summary

Secondary infections remain a major cause of mortality in critically ill patients, mainly because of high prevalence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms. Therefore strategies aimed to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumoniae (VAP) and bloodstream infections are of utmost important. There is robust data on selective digestive decontamination (SDD) efficacy in reduction of secondary infections in intensive care units (ICU) with low rates of antibacterial resistance. However the data received from hospitals with moderate-to-high rates of resistance is equivocal. This as an interventional parallel open-label study investigating the effect of selective digestive decontamination on the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU with high prevalence of drug-resistant bacteria. Secondary outcomes include rates of bloodstream infections, mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of ICU stay, resistance selection and overall antibiotic consumption.

Detailed description

Single-center prospective interventional parallel study. During the first period of the study patients will receive standard therapy. During the second period the SDD protocol will be implemented in addition to the standard care. The first period will end at the moment of the last admitted patient ICU discharge or death. Study population: general ICU adult patients anticipated to receive prolonged mechanical ventilation (more than 48 hours). Patients who are terminally ill and are anticipated to die in the next 24 hours will be excluded, so are patients with malignancies (except for patients with primary central nervous system tumors who received radical treatment) and patients admitted from other hospitals who received mechanical ventilation (including non-invasive ventilation) for more than 24 hours. Patients in the interventional arm will receive the following SDD protocol: 1. Oral paste (0,5 g) containing 10 mg of polymyxin B, 10 mg of gentamycin and 150 mg of amphotericine B/500000 U of nistatin q6h 2. In the nasogastric tube (NGT) 10 ml of suspension containing 100 mg of polymyxin B, 80 mg of gentamycin, 350 mg of amphotericine B/8000000 U of nistatin and 500 mg of vancomycin q6h 3. A 3-day course of intravenous cefotaxime 1 g q6h/ceftriaxone 1 qd Statistical considerations and recruitment plant: VAP incidence in the ICU with high rates of antibacterial resistance is 16,7 event per 1000 days of MV. To reveal a 25% decrease of VAP events (power 80%, p \< 0,05) the study should recruit 25 patients in each group. However because of the poor prognosis in mechanically ventilated elderly patients especially in the setting of acute respiratory distress syndrome the goal is to recruit in each arm at least 25 patients younger than 65 years.

Interventions

DRUGOral Paste(0,5 g) containing 10 mg of polymyxin B, 10 mg of gentamycin and 150 mg of amphotericine B or 500 000 U of nistatin q6h

The oral paste will be applied topically on the oropharyngeal mucosa q6h.

DRUGSuspension (10 ml) containing 100 mg of polymyxin B, 80 mg of gentamycin, 350 mg of amphotericine B or 8000000 U of nistation and 500 mg of vancomycin q6h

The suspension will be administered through the nasogastric tube q6h.

DRUGIntravenous Antibacterial Agent - a 3-day course of systemic cefotaxime 1 g q6h or ceftriaxone 1 g qd

Patients who do not receive systemic antibiotics for other reasons will get a short course of systemic antibiotic

Sponsors

MEDSI Clinical Hospital 1, ICU
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

During the first period patients will receive standard care. During the second period SDD protocol will be implemented.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with expected MV for more than 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Moribund condition and expected death within 24 hours * Malignancy (excluding primary CNS tumors) * Patients transferred from other hospitals who were mechanically ventilated for more than 24 hours (including NIV)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumoniaDuring ICU stay up to 28 daysNumber of ventilator-associated pneumonia events per 1000 days of MV

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The incidence of bloodstream infectionsDuring ICU stay up to 28 daysNumber of bloodstream infection events per 1000 days of ICU stay
ICU mortalityDuring ICU stay up to 28 daysAll-cause mortality
Duration of mechanical ventilationDuring ICU stay up to 28 daysThe duration that the patient receives mechanical ventilation in the ICU
Duration of organ supportDuring ICU stay up to 28 daysThe duration that the patient receives mechanical ventilation, vasopressor infusion or renal-replacement therapy
Antimicrobial drug consumptionDuring ICU stay up to 28 daysAverage antimicrobial drug consumption (as daily defined doses) per patient stay
Antimicrobial resistance selectionDuring ICU stay up to 28 daysThe magnitude of antimicrobial resistance selection in terms of resistant microorganisms prevalence and whole burden of AMR genes

Countries

Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactYury Surovoy, MD
ysurovoy@gmail.com+79166911507
Backup ContactArmen Oganesyan, MD
oganesyan.av@medsigroup.ru

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026