Skip to content

Comparing Between CO2 and Phenylephrine Treatment in Patients With Progressive Lacunar Infarction (CARBOGEN Study)

Comparing Between CO2 and Phenylephrine Treatment in Patients With Progressive Lacunar Infarction (CARBOGEN Study)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04839224
Enrollment
3
Registered
2021-04-09
Start date
2021-04-05
Completion date
2024-09-12
Last updated
2025-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

CO2, carbogen, phenylephrine, lacunar infarction, progressive stroke

Brief summary

Lacunar infarction is an ischemic stroke occurred by small perforating artery occlusion . Twenty percent of ischemic stroke is lacunar infarction. However, outcome of lacunar infarction is excellent, about 20-40% patients are suffered neurological worsening. Progressive lacunar infarction is associated poor functional outcome and neurological deficit. Currently, no treatment for progressive lacunar infarction is recommended on the guideline. Several small study reported that phenylephrine and magnesium may be helpful for progressive lacunar infarction. Carbogen is a mixture of 5% CO2 with 95% O2. Carbogen is safe and it is used for the treatment of sudden sensory neural hearing loss or ocular ischemia. CO2 dilate cerebral arteriole and concentration of CO2 is correlated with cerebral blood flow. Lacunar infarction is small and perfused with marginal flow by neighboring perforating arteriole. Increased cerebral blood flow following dilation of cerebral arteriole by CO2 might halt and revert progressive lacunar infarction. Induced hypertension is alternative treatment of progressive lacunar infarction. Increasing blood pressure also induce cerebral blood flow. Phenylephrine is an α1 agonist, phenylephrine act on peripheral artery and little effect on cerebral artery or heart. Several studies reported that the effectiveness of phenylephrine on progressing stroke. Therefore, this study will compare the effectiveness of carbogen versus phenylephrine in lacunar infarction patients who suffered neurological worsening.

Interventions

Patients will inhale carbogen gas for 10 minutes and rest for 50 minutes.

DRUGphenylephrine

Start phenylephrine with 0.5 mg/hr and titrate upto 3.5 mg/hr or systolic blod pressure 200 mmHg.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Three months after discharge, the independence assessment will be performed by the researcher who don't know the patients group.

Intervention model description

1. The study is a single center, prospective, randomized, open-label trial with blinded end-point assessment (PROBE) design study. 2. For the patients with neurological worsening after lacunar infarction, the carbogen group and the phenylephrine group will be randomized by 1: 1. 3. Patients will be enrolled from April 2021 to December 2022 (based on the date of stroke). 4. We will collect medical history, laboratory findings, neurological scores, and functional recovery. 5. Functional recovery scores are performed by independent researchers in the blind state. 6. All data is collected using e-CRF, and the image study will be anonymized and sent to the central adjudication. 7. Central adjudication will review the image study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥20 years 2. Anterior circulation progressive lacunar infarction. 3. Neurological worsening either 1 point in NIHSS score or MRC grade

Exclusion criteria

1. Age \<20 2. Cortical infarction 3. Posterior circulation lacunar infarction 4. Relevant artery stenosis more than 50% or occlusion 5. Moyamoya disease 6. Difficulty in inhalation of Carbogen (panic, severe anxiety disorder) 7. Drug allergy for phenylephrine 8. Persistent bradycardia (pulse rate \< 50 /min) 9. History of hemorrhagic stroke 10. Pre-stroke mRS ≥2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety outcome: discontinuing patientswithin 7 daysNumber of discontinuing patients due to side effects
percent improvement of NIHSS score in each group48 hours(baseline NIHSS score-post-treatment NIHSS score)/baseline NIHSS score×100
difference of NIHSS score in each group48 hoursbaseline NIHSS score-post-treatment NIHSS score
percent improvement of MRC score in each groupwithin 48 hours(baseline MRC score-post-treatment MRC score)/baseline MRC score×100
difference of MRC score in each groupwithin 48 hoursbaseline MRC score-post-treatment MRC score
Safety outcome: Side effectwithin 7 daysSide effect (cerebral hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, Losing consciousness, difficulty breathing, dizziness, fatigue, headache, anxiety, etc)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison between groups by difference of NIHSS score48 hoursbaseline NIHSS score-post-treatment NIHSS score
Comparison between groups by percent improvement in MRC scorewithin 48 hours(baseline MRC score-post-treatment MRC score)/baseline MRC score×100
Comparison between groups by difference of MRC scorewithin 48 hoursbaseline MRC score-post-treatment MRC score
Functional independenceupon discharge, 3 months after onsetmodified Rankin score 0 to 2
Comparison between groups by percent improvement of NIHSS score48 hours(baseline NIHSS score-post-treatment NIHSS score)/baseline NIHSS score×100

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026