Negotiation Training for Caregiver Communication in AD

Caregiver well-being as measured by the Positive Affect and Well-being scale for the Neurology Quality of Life (Neuro-QOL). The measure is a 9-item panel rating how caregivers experience feelings of positive affect and well-being. Responses are Likert scales, scored 1-5, Never (1), Rarely (2), Sometimes (3), Often (4), Always (5). Responses are summed for a final score and converted to a t-score per Neuro-QoL manual scoring conventions. Population mean T-Score is 50 and SD is 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Positive Affect and Well-Being. Positive change represents an increase in positive affect/well-being, and negative change represents a decrease.

Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and 1 Month Post-intervention

Population: All participants with available data at baseline and 1 month post-intervention assessments were analyzed.

TBI-CareQOL is a set of self-report measures within the Neuro-QoL™ measurement system that assesses the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of caregivers of adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Among these is the Caregiver specific anxiety measure. This is a six item likert panel with responses rated 1=never and 5=always, for a combined score range of 6-30. Higher scores indicate greater levels of anxiety. Raw scores were rescaled per the Neuro-QoL scoring manual into T-Scores with a mean of 50 and an SD of 10. Difference between T-score at baseline and 1-month was computed for each participant to produce a change score, and these change scores are averaged to produce per condition means.

Time frame: 1 month post-baseline

Population: All participants with data available at 1 months post baseline were included in the analysis.

The PROMIS Adult Emotional Distress-Anxiety scale measures self-reported fear (fearfulness, panic), anxious misery (worry, dread), and hyper-arousal (tension, nervousness, restlessness) in respondents during the past 7 days. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always). We deployed the four item short form, with scores ranging from 4-20, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore, a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. We calculate change in T-Score from baseline to one month per participant and take the mean of those observations to produce mean change in T-score by condition.

Time frame: 1 months post-baseline

Population: All participants who were randomized and completed the 1 month post-intervention assessment are included in the change analysis (n=125).

The PROMIS Fatigue instruments evaluate a range of self-reported symptoms, from mild subjective feelings of tiredness to an overwhelming, debilitating, and sustained sense of exhaustion that likely decreases one's ability to execute daily activities and function normally in family or social roles. We deployed PROMIS Fatigue Form 7a, a seven item likert scale panel ranging from 1=never to 5=always. Scores range from 7-35. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore, a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. We calculate change in T-Score from baseline to one month per participant and take the mean of those observations to produce mean change in T-score by condition.

Time frame: 1 month post-baseline

Population: All participants with data available at 1 months post baseline were included in the analysis.

The PROMIS adult Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities item bank assesses satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities (e.g., I am satisfied with my ability to participate in family activities). Short form 8a is deployed here. This is an 8 item likert scale panel, with responses rated 1=never and 5=always. Scores range from 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with social roles and activities. The raw score is rescaled per the PROMIS scoring manual into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean.

Time frame: 1 months post-baseline

Population: All participants with data available at 1 months post baseline were included in the analysis.

the PROMIS General Self-Efficacy - Short Form is a four item panel which measures confidence in one's ability to successfully perform specific tasks or behaviors related to one's health in a variety of situations. The four items are 1-5 Likert scales, 1=never, 5=always. Minimum score is a 4 and maximum is a 20. Raw Scores are converted to T scores with mean 50 and SD 10 per the PROMIS scoring manual. Higher score=greater self efficacy.

Time frame: 1 months post-baseline

Population: All participants with data available at 1 months post baseline were included in the analysis.

The Zarit Burden Interview, a popular caregiver self-report measure used by many aging agencies, originated as a 29-item questionnaire (Zarit, Reever & Bach-Peterson, 1980). The revised version contains 22 items. Each item on the interview is a statement which the caregiver is asked to endorse using a 5-point scale. Response options range from 0 (Never) to 4 (Nearly Always). The total score range is 0 to 88. Increasing scores indicate increasing burden. Scores were measured at baseline and at 1 month post-intervention and a change score was computed for each participant. These change scores are averaged to produce the by-condition mean change in burden score. Positive results indicate an increase in burden, and negative results indicate a decrease in burden.

Time frame: 1 month post-baseline

Population: All participants with data available at 1 months post baseline were included in the analysis.

PROMIS Emotional Support - Short Form. The PROMIS Emotional Support item bank assesses perceived feelings of being cared for and valued as a person; having confident relationships. The short form 6a deployed here is a 6 item likert scale panel, which assesses responses as 1=never and 5=always in response to item statements. Minimum score is a 6 and maximum is a 30. Higher scores indicate greater feelings of emotional support. The raw score is rescaled per the PROMIS scoring manual into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean.

Time frame: Baseline Measure

Population: All individuals who received and completed the baseline assessment are included in the analysis population (N=131).

The Dutch Test for Conflict Handling measures aspects of conflict resolution pertaining to the negotiator. The DUTCH measures conflict handling in five domains: avoiding, forcing, yielding, problem solving, and compromising. Each domain is measured independently using panels of four 1-5 likert scale questions each. Domain scores thus range from 5-20, converted to 0-100 with the following formula: 6.25\*(domain score-1). Intra-participant change is measured for each subdomain between baseline and 1 month and generalized to produce mean change per domain. Higher scores per domain indicate more intense conflict handling behavior in the given domain- lower scores indicate less intensity.

Time frame: 1 month post-baseline

Population: All 125 participants who completed both the baseline and 1-month post-intervention assessments are included in the analysis.

We deployed a panel of 15 questions measuring participant knowledge of negotiation techniques. The panel measures knowledge in three subdomains (identification of interests, rights, and power statements) and can also be measured in aggregate to assess knowledge across the three subdomains. Participants receive 1 point for each correct answer. All Scores, including subdomain scores, are converted to a 0/100 measure. Intraparticipant change is assessed between baseline and 1 month post-intervention. Dependent Sample T-Tests were performed on the change scores from baseline-1 month.

Time frame: 1 months post-baseline

Population: All Participants who completed the 1 month post-intervention assessment are included.

The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a self-report questionnaire that consists of two 10-item scales to measure both positive and negative affect. Each item is rated on a 5-point verbal frequency scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Scores are evaluated out of 50. The ten item scales thus have score ranges from 10-50. Higher scores in a single domain indicate greater perception of that type of affect. So, higher positive affect scores=greater positive affect, and higher negative affect scores=higher negative affect. Positive change on either scale indicates an increase in that domain, and negative change on either scale indicates a decrease in that domain.

Time frame: 1 month post-baseline

Population: All participants with data available at 1 month post-intervention were included in the analysis.

Measuring the feasibility of the intervention by assessing completion of negotiation training exercises.

Time frame: 2 weeks post-baseline

Percentage- numerator=# of participants who completed 3 month post-baseline assessment, denominator=# of participants randomized to a condition.

Time frame: 3 months post-baseline

Population: 131 participants were randomized from a total 133 consented- 2 did not complete pre-randomization activities. Here we were interested in the raw number of recruited participants retained regardless of intervention received, thus all participants were considered in the analysis and group segmentation would be inappropriate for the calculation.

Measuring the feasibility of the intervention by measuring the usability of the intervention as measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS), a 10-item measure of usability. SUS is a 10-item likert panel, with scores ranging from 1-5. Scores are tabulated by converting raw scores by subtracting 1 from each raw score and then summing per the scoring manual: summed score=2.5\*(20+(sum of odd numbered questions)-(sum of even number questions)). The minimum and maximum values are thus 50 and 100. Higher scores indicate greater usability.

Time frame: 2 weeks post-intervention

Population: 128 participants of 131 randomized completed the 2 weeks post-intervention assessment.

The USE Acceptability score measures the acceptability of the intervention, employing an 8-item panel of 1-7 Likert scale questions, with a 0 option for not applicable. Raw score is converted to 0-100 score as follows: 2.040163\*(summed raw scores - 8). Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

Time frame: 2 weeks post-intervention

Population: 128 of 131 randomized participants completed the post-intervention assessment.

We deployed a survey panel of 5 yes/no questions to participants asking them about utilization of negotiation techniques in the month following the intervention. Result rates are out of 100%.

Time frame: 1 month post-baseline

Population: 125 participants out of 131 randomized had data available at one month post-intervention. Of those, only 85 were deployed the website utilization question.