Skip to content

Feasibility & Acceptability of a Virtual Sister Circle Intervention for Black Women With Depressive Symptoms

Evaluating the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Therapeutically-Grounded Virtual Sister Circle Intervention for Black Women With Depressive Symptoms

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04837573
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-04-08
Start date
2022-09-14
Completion date
2023-04-02
Last updated
2026-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, Depressive Symptoms

Keywords

Sister Circle, Black Women

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a protocol for middle- and older-aged Black women with depressive symptoms.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSister Circle protocol

The intervention is an 8-week, therapeutically-informed protocol.

Sponsors

Kia Skrine Jeffers, PhD, RN, PHN
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Identify as Black or African American * Identify as female * Age 40 years and older * Community-dwelling * Self-report of experiencing depressive symptoms * Ability to commit to the 8-week intervention * Access to Zoom * Speak and read English

Exclusion criteria

* Have a diagnosis of bipolar, but is not taking medication for the condition * Experiencing psychosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Completion and Retention Rates of Participants as Measures of Feasibility12 weeksCompletion: # of participants who attended 4+ sessions/ # participants available to attend 4+ sessions Retention: # retained/ # enrolled
Number of Participants Who Reported Acceptability According to the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability12 weeksQualitative assessment of Acceptability. The interview guide was organized according to the 7 constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Participants reported whether the intervention was an acceptable fit with their personal value of becoming more whole, and with their collective value of addressing their depressive symptoms and experiences in a trusted space.
Proportion of Eligible Potential Participants That Enrolled in the Study, as a Measure of Feasibility6 weeksRecruitment: # enrolled/# eligible

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Psychological Flexibility (Baseline to 6 Weeks)Baseline to 6 weeksChanges in psychological flexibility scores from baseline to 6 weeks using the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II). Scores range from 7-49. Lower scores indicate greater psychological flexibility (better outcome).

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKia Skrine Jeffers, PhD, RN, PHN

University of California, Los Angeles

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 6, 2026