Skip to content

GlideScope Spectrum Video Laryngoscope Blades and Stylet for Use in Neonate & Pre-Adolescent Populations

Assessment of the GlideScope Spectrum Video Laryngoscope Blades and Stylet for Use in Neonate & Pre-Adolescent Populations: Pilot Manikin Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04836338
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-04-08
Start date
2016-01-21
Completion date
2020-10-01
Last updated
2021-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric ALL

Brief summary

The overall purpose of this study is to assess the functionality & impact of the use of the newly designed GlideScope Spectrum pediatric video laryngoscope and stylet for the orotracheal intubation of neonates and pediatric patients, utilizing manikin models.

Detailed description

The overall purpose of this study is to assess the functionality & impact of the use of the newly designed GlideScope Spectrum pediatric video laryngoscope blades and stylet for the orotracheal intubation of neonates and pediatric patients, utilizing manikin models. The hypothesis is that the Spectrum laryngoscope blades and stylet can improve the time and/or success of orotracheal intubation in a manikin. Secondary aims of this study include assessing the impact of Spectrum pediatric video laryngoscope blades under simulated normal and difficult airway conditions on glottic view grade, mouth space, ease of blade insertion, ease of tracheal tube insertion, mechanisms of tracheal tube insertion impediment, and perceived overall clinical & functional usefulness in airways with predictors of difficult intubation.

Interventions

DEVICEorotracheal intubation

orotracheal intubation

Sponsors

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Verathon
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Anesthesia and emergency medicine providers who perform pediatric orotracheal intubations * Able to give voluntary consent to participate in the study * Are experienced with orotracheal intubation (\> 50 times) using direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* Volunteers who are \< 18 years of age * Volunteers unable to read or understand English * Unable to physically meet the demands of orotracheal intubation or those who have heart, wrist, or low back disease. Are not experienced with pediatric orotracheal intubations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to intubate120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.Time to intubate on each of 3 attempts per blade, on each manikin type.
First pass success rate120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.First pass success rate on each of 3 attempts per blade, on each manikin type. First pass success (FPS) is defined as the ability to place a tracheal tube below a patient's vocal cords on the first attempt without removing the video laryngoscope from the patient's mouth.
Overall performance and clinical utility using a 5-point Likert Scale120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.Overall performance and clinical utility of single-use pediatric stylet; Using a 5-point LIKERT SCALE, participants will grade the following statements with regards to the use of the single-use pediatric stylet 1. = strongly disagree 2. = disagree 3. = neutral 4. = agree 5. = strongly agree e.g. - Participants will assign a number to the following statements: * The pediatric style was easy to insert into the mouth of the when used with normal neonate manikin * The pediatric style was easy to insert into the mouth of the when used with the difficult neonate manikin * The pediatric style was easy to insert into the mouth of the when used with normal pediatric manikin

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Failed intubation attempt120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.The time taken for an intubation attempt that ultimately fails proper tube placement, or exceeds the allowed time for intubation under this protocol. Failed intubation attempt is defined as an attempt to intubate that does not result in tube placement, that is longer than 120 seconds, or results in a wrong placement of endotracheal tube (For example: Esophageal intubation, etc.).
Intubation success on first attempt120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.Cumulative measure of intubation success on first attempt over 3 successive uses of the pediatric video laryngoscope, per blade, on each manikin type.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glottic view grade120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.Glottic view grade on each of 3 attempts per blade, on each manikin type using the Cormack & Lehane grading scale: * Grade 1 = Full view of vocal cords * Grade 2a = Partial view of vocal cords * Grade 2b = Only arytenoids/posterior part of vocal cords * Grade 3 = Only epiglottis visible, no view of glottis or arytenoids * Grade 4 = Neither glottis nor epiglottis visible
Overall satisfaction of operator120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.Recorded as excellent, good, fair, or inadequate by the study subject when using each of the pediatric video laryngoscope blades and stylet to place a tracheal tube below manikin's vocal cords.
Time to visualize glottis120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.Time to visualize the glottis on each of 3 attempts per blade, on each manikin type.
Assessment of clinical utility and performance using a Lickert scale120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.Assessment of the clinical utility and performance of the pediatric blades using a 5-point Lickert scale, where 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3= neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree. * Ease of the pediatric video laryngoscope blade insertion when attempting to insert the pediatric video laryngoscope blade into manikin's mouth for each blade type and manikin type. * Ease of tracheal intubation when attempting to pass a tracheal tube below manikin's vocal cords using each of the pediatric video laryngoscope blades on each manikin type. * Assessment of the comfort of each blade handle during neonate/pediatric intubations. * Assessment of the blade and cable connection during neonate/pediatric intubation with each blade type. * Assessment of potential cable interference during neonate/pediatric intubation with each blade type.
Observational description of features causing impediments120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.Participant self-reported observational description of potential features causing intubation impediments to tracheal tube insertion (e.g., tube hitting the epiglottis or tube hitting the arytenoid). Recorded by the study subject at the time of attempt at placing a tracheal tube below a patient's vocal cords using each of the pediatric video laryngoscope blades.
Overall clinical usefulness120 seconds - This is the maximum time allowed. After this time, it will be recorded as a failed attempt.Recorded as excellent, good, fair, or inadequate by the study subject when using the pediatric video laryngoscope and stylet to place a tracheal tube below a patient's vocal cords.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026