Skip to content

Effect tDCS of Motor Cortex on Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Effect of Motor Cortex Stimulation by Concentric Electrode Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04833920
Enrollment
26
Registered
2021-04-06
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2021-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Keywords

brain stimulation, chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy

Brief summary

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) occurs in conjunction with the use of anticancer medication such as vinca alkaloids (including vincristine), taxanes (including paclitaxel), and platinum preparations (including cisplatin and oxaliplatin)

Detailed description

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) occurs in conjunction with the use of anticancer medication such as vinca alkaloids (including vincristine), taxanes (including paclitaxel), and platinum preparations (including cisplatin and oxaliplatin) . CIPN is one of several long term side effects of anticancer medications that can appear during and after treatment. CIPN symptoms include pain, dysesthesia, motor and sensory disorders. CIPN can also be insufficiently responsive to pharmaceutical therapy similar to other types of refractory neuropathic pain This study is designed to evaluate the effect of two concentric electrode transcranial direct current stimulation (CE-tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M) in management of chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy.

Interventions

DEVICEtranscranial dirrect current brain stimuation

tDCS (2 mA) targeting the primary motor cortex of the contralateral side of the painful side for 20 minute duration for five sessions in five consecutive days (one session /day),

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* any stage of cancer, with a confirmed treatment plan consisting of taxane-based or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, neuropathic pain and/or peripheral sensory neuropathy with VAS score ≥ 3 that are resistant to medical treatment

Exclusion criteria

* patients with intracranial metallic devices or with pacemakers or any other device. - -W those with extensive myocardial ischemia, * higher brain dysfunction, * migraine headache, * brain cancer or metastasis and * those known to have epilepsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes in the visual analogue scale0 (prestimulation), on the 5th day, 15th days and one month after the last sessionpatient describe his pain scored from 0 to 10 where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes in the Leeds Assessment of neuropathic Symptoms and signs (LANSS)0 (prestimulation),on the 5th day, 15th days and one month after the last sessionthe patients will be asked to describe his pain by answering questions in yes or no; score ≥ 12 suggests neuropathic pain is likely to be involved and score \< 12 suggests that neuropathic pain is unlikely to be involved

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactShereen M Kamal, Associate professor
sheridouh79@yahoo.com01006279209

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026