Lumbar Disc Prolapse With Radiculopathy
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a 2-arm parallel pragmatic randomized controlled trial that will compare non-pharmacological treatment with pharmacological therapy for lumbar disc herniation.
Detailed description
Participants who voluntarily signed informed consent form and eligible for the study were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio (15:15) for non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment group. Participants of each group will receive twice a week for total 8 weeks of intervention. This is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, so physicians will have medical decision making according to each participant's conditions and choose the specific intervention and dosage of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment.
Interventions
OTHERKM non-pharmacological treatment group
This is a pragmatic setting, and specific intervention is not determined prior to the study. Non-pharmacological treatment including Korean medicine, such as acupuncture, electroacupuncture and chuna, etc, will be chosen by professional physician according to the medical condition of each subject.
OTHERPharmacological treatment group
This is a pragmatic setting, and specific intervention is not determined prior to the study. The pharmacological treatment will be chosen by professional physician according to the medical condition of each subject.
Sponsors
Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine
Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Numeric rating scale (NRS) score of radiating pain 5 or more for recent 3 serial days. 2. Onset time of radiating pain occurred within 12 weeks. 3. Radiologically diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (L-spine MRI) 4. 19-70 years old 5. participants who agreed and signed informed consent form
Exclusion criteria
1. Spine metastasis of cancer, acute fracture of spine, or spine dislocation 2. Progressive neurologic deficits or severe neurologic deficits 3. Soft tissue diseases that can induce low back pain(ie. cancer, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, gout,etc) 4. Presence of chronic underlying disease which can interfere the efficacy or interpretation (ie. stroke, myocardial infarct, kidney disease, dementia, diabetic neuropathy, epilepsy, etc) 5. Concurrent use of steroids, immunosuppressants, orpsychotropic medications or any other medication that can interrupt the study result 6. Hemorrhagic disease, severe diabetes or taking anticoagulant drug 7. Participants who took NSAIDs or pharmacopuncture within 1 week 8. Pregnant or lactating women 9. Participants who had undergone lumbar surgery within 3 months 10. Participants who had participated in other clinical trial within 1 month, or have plan for participation in other trial during follow up period of this trial 11. Participants who can not write informed consent 12. Participants who is difficult to participate in the trial according to investigator's decision
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Numeric rating scale (NRS) of radiating pain in lower extremities | week 9 | NRS is a pain scale in which the patient indicates their subjective pain as awhole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Numeric rating scale (NRS) of low-back pain | week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27 | NRS is a pain scale in which the patient indicates their subjective pain as awhole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'. |
| Visual analogue scale (VAS) of leg radiating pain | week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27 | Visual analogue scale of radiating leg pain, minimum 0 to maximum 100,which is a higher score means a worse outcome. |
| Visual analogue scale (VAS) of low-back pain | week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27 | Visual analogue scale of radiating leg pain, minimum 0 to maximum 100,which is a higher score means a worse outcome. |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27 | ODI is a functional disability questionnaire. The possible range of eachitem score is 0 to 5. Total score range is 0 (better outcome) to 100 (worse outcome) |
| Numeric rating scale (NRS) of radiating pain in lower extremities | week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27 | NRS is a pain scale in which the patient indicates their subjective pain as awhole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'. |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | week 9, 14, 27 | Participants rate the improvement after treatment on a 7-point Likert scale(1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, nochange; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse.) |
| Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) | week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27 | The SF-12 consists of 12 questions across 8 domains, and higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. |
| EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) | week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27 | The EQ-5D-5L consists of 5 questions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, anxiety/depression) that ask about the current state of health, and answers each question with 5 likert. (1=I have no problems about, 2=I have slight problems about, 3=I have moderate problems about, 4=I have severe problems about, 5=I am unable to about) |
| Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) | week 1, 9, 14, 27 | FABQ is one of pateint-reported outcome questionnaire which consists of total 16 questions. Through FABQ, the investigator can evaluate fear avoidance responses, especially in physical and occupational activity domain for patients with low-back pain |
Countries
South Korea
Outcome results
None listed