Skip to content

Assessment of the Acceptability of a Humanoid Robot at Home for Children With Cochlear Implants - H2R2

Assessment of the Acceptability of a Humanoid Robot at Home for Children With Cochlear Implants - H2R2

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04832373
Acronym
H2R2
Enrollment
10
Registered
2021-04-05
Start date
2021-09-17
Completion date
2023-03-29
Last updated
2025-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cochlear Implantation

Keywords

cochlear implantation, humanoid robot

Brief summary

The quality of the rehabilitation of deafness in children with cochlear implantation is a major prognostic factor for the outcome on speech comprehension and oral expression. This rehabilitation is carried out cooperatively by the hospital cochlear implantation team, and by a speech therapist located near the child's home. The multi-weekly sessions represent a constraint for the child and his parents. Complementary training work at home would make it possible to balance the equity in the distribution of care in the territory, and should promote the progress of the child, who is more inclined to use a tool available at home.

Detailed description

The humanoid robot should allow an ecological approach to this additional rehabilitation. Before developing this approach, it is necessary to study the acceptability of the humanoid robot at home, both by the parents and by the cochlear implanted child. The main objective of this study is to assess the acceptability by the child and his family, of a humanoid robot installed at home for one month. The secondary objectives are to describe the acceptability of the child and his family that is the relationship to technology, the intention of use, expectations, perceived utility, perception of the robot and facilitating conditions before then after 1 month of using the robot at home, \- describe the child's acceptability with respect to his experience, his fun and the emotions felt when he uses the robot at home

Interventions

DEVICEInteraction with humanoid robot

A humanoid robot will be installed for 30 days in children. It has a touchscreen tablet, allowing manual interaction complementing the voice interaction. The robot speaks, hears, and has facial and voice identification.

Sponsors

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Child aged 8 to 12, user of his cochlear implant with a favorable family environment, * Child implanted with at least one cochlear implant undergoing speech therapy rehabilitation, and monitored by the pediatric cochlear implant unit (UPIC) of the Toulouse University Hospital * Child and his family whose mother tongue is French * Affiliation to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive or psychological inability or refusal of the participant to give written consent * Other sensory or motor deficit that may interfere with the use of the robot * Unstable psychiatric pathology * Child with both parents benefiting from a legal protection measure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability of a humanoid robotmonth 1assess by the number of weekly hours during which the child uses the robot.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relationship to technologymonth 1Assessment by a set of questionnaires and standardized scales validated by the scientific community
Intention of usemonth 1Assessment by a set of questionnaires and standardized scales validated by the scientific community
Relationship with the robotmonth 1Assessment by a set of questionnaires and standardized scales validated by the scientific community
User experienceMonth 1Assessment by a set of questionnaires and standardized scales validated by the scientific community
participants' expectationsMonth 1Measurement by sentence completion which consists of giving the beginning of a sentence and letting the user complete the rest of the sentence
3EmethodMonth 1Evaluation of emotions in the form of a drawing with a speech bubble and a thought bubble.
classification of activitiesMonth 1classification according to various criteria (good functioning, fun, ease of use)
FeedbackMonth 1with a Semi-structured interview on the use of the robot

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026