Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of IV Diazoxide as an Additive to Hyperkalemic Cardioplegia in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

A Randomized Placebo Controlled Single Center Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of IV Diazoxide as an Additive to Hyperkalemic Cardioplegia in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04830982
Enrollment
0
Registered
2021-04-05
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2025-10-30
Last updated
2022-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Stunning

Brief summary

This study aims to confirm the safety and efficacy of diazoxide as an additive to hyperkalemic cardioplegia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The investigators hypothesize that diazoxide combined with hyperkalemic cardioplegia provides superior myocardial protection and reduced myocardial stunning compared with standard cardioplegia alone. The investigators will randomize 30 patients in a 2:1 fashion to treatment vs control. Safety will be assessed by comparing mean arterial blood pressure measurements, glucose levels and incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Efficacy will be assessed by comparing right and left ventricular function in pre-operative vs post-operative transesophageal echocardiograms, need for mechanical circulatory support, ease of separation from bypass and Vasoactive Inotrope Score (VIS) between the two groups. The information gained could pave the way for the use of Katp (Potassium-atp) channel openers to prevent stunning, improve patient outcomes, and reduce health care costs related to myocardial stunning that requires inotropic and mechanical support following cardiac surgery.

Detailed description

This is a randomized blinded Phase I clinical trial. Thirty patients total will be randomized on a 2:1 basis to treatment (IV Diazoxide added to cardioplegia) vs control (cardioplegia alone). Diazoxide will be added to the first dose of cardioplegia only. Subsequent doses of cardioplegia will not contain additives.

Interventions

500 micromoles added to one liter of cardioplegia

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo added to one liter of cardioplegia

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or older * Scheduled for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest * Patient scheduled for elective cardiac surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with Diabetes Mellitus on sulfonylurea medications * Scheduled for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or heart transplant * Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30% * Pre-operative placement or planned use of mechanical circulatory support during surgery * Allergy to Thiazide and its derivatives * History of gout * Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety as assessed by mean change in blood pressureFrom first dose of cardioplegia through 24 hours post operativelyMean blood pressure measurements in mmHg.
Safety as assessed by change in blood glucose levelsFrom first dose of cardioplegia through 48 hours post operativelyBlood glucose levels in mg/dl.
Safety as assessed by incidence of adverse eventsFrom first dose of cardioplegia through 7 days post operatively or discharge, whichever comes firstSafety will be assessed by total number of adverse events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy as assessed by change in ejection fractionDay of surgery (pre and post surgery)Comparison of right and left ventricular function (measured as a percentage) on pre and post operative Transesophageal echocardiograms
Efficacy as assessed by time to separate from Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB)Day of surgeryFrom time of first turn down of CPB to CPB end time measured in minutes.
Efficacy as assessed by use of mechanical circulatory support48 hours post operativelyIncidence of mechanical circulatory support use will be used in the assessment of efficacy.
Efficacy as assessed by change in Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS)0, 24, 48 and 72 hours post operativelyComparison of VIS Score with values from 0 to \>45, with lower scores indicating medication efficacy (0e5, \>5e15, \>15e30, \>30e45, and \>45 points).

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026