Skip to content

Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy Combined With Static Magnetic Field in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis

Evaluation of the Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy Combined With Static Magnetic Field (PBMT-sMF) on Temporary Pain Relief in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04829734
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-04-02
Start date
2021-04-12
Completion date
2021-09-15
Last updated
2025-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Epicondylitis

Keywords

Photobiomodulation Therapy, Low-level Laser Therapy, Static Magnetic Fields, Epicondylitis, Intensity of Pain

Brief summary

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most frequently encountered lesions affecting the upper extremity and is the most common cause of elbow pain in adults. It occurs on the lateral side of the elbow where the common extensors originate from the lateral epicondyle. LE can be considered an overuse injury which occurs on the lateral side of the elbow in the extensor tendons with repetitive micro-trauma. The clinical presentation of LE involves a painful or burning sensation over the humeral insertion of the common extensor tendons. Despite the high incidence of LE, optimal treatment has not been established. Treatment options include therapeutic exercise, bracing, shock wave or ultrasound therapy , but many of them lack sufficient evidence of beneficial effects. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) alone or combined with static magnetic field (PBMT-sMF) has been shown to stimulate tendon healing, this suggests that therapy using laser or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) is efficacious for the symptoms associated with epicondylitis. According to the favorable results of PBMT-sMF in tendons repair processes, this type of therapy can be used as a therapeutic tool for management in epicondylitis, therefore, more investigations are necessary to establish the ideal parameters. Therefore, the aim of this project is to investigate the effects of PBMT-sMF, in the appropriate parameters, on degree of pain and quality of life of patients with lateral epicondylitis.

Detailed description

To achieve the proposed objective it will be performed a multi-center, randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, with voluntary patients with lateral epicondylitis. Fifty patients will be randomly allocated to two treatment groups: 1. Active PBMT-sMF (MR5® Prototype Device) or Placebo PBMT-sMF (MR5® Prototype Device). The patients will be treated by a blinded therapist. The patients randomly allocated to the different groups will be subjected to treatment two times a week for three consecutive weeks, each procedure administration three to four days apart. The study will contain five phases: 1) pre-procedure activities; 2) pre-procedure assessment phase; 3) procedure administration phase; 4) procedure administration phase measures; 5) post-procedure administration phase. The outcomes measured will be: degree of pain, forearm pain and disability, grip strength, TNF-α levels, subject satisfaction with overall outcome rating, perceived group assignment and adverse events. The outcomes will be obtained at the stabilization phase (pre-procedure activities), baseline (pre-procedure assessment phase), 24 hours after the end of the treatment (procedure administration phase measures), and 30 days after the end of the treatment (post-procedure administration phase). Statistical analysis: 1. The primary statistical method to analyze the primary endpoint will be Fisher's exact test to compare the proportion of success between the test (Active PBMT-sMF) and the control (Placebo PBMT-sMF) groups, considering that randomization has been diligently conducted and important covariates between the two groups are well balanced. Statistical significance will be set at p\<0.05. 2. The secondary outcomes that are continuous variables will be analyzed through parametric analysis using ANCOVA. Statistical significance will be set at p\<0.05. 3. For patient satisfaction, measured through a Likert Scale, the data will be reduced to the nominal level by combining all agree and disagree responses into two categories of accept and reject. Differences in satisfaction with Study Outcome Ratings between procedure groups at both evaluated time-points, and any change between. The chi-square will be used after this transformation. Statistical significance will be set at p\<0.05.

Interventions

The Active PBMT-sMF will be applied using MRM® MR5 Prototype manufactured by Multi Radiance Medical (Solon, OH, USA). PBMT-sMF will be applied using the direct contact method with light pressure on the skin. The PBMT-sMF will be applied in four regions of the epicondyle and the application time will be 60 seconds per region. The total dose of PBMT-sMF will be 108,30 J per treatment session.

The Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied using MRM® MR5 Prototype manufactured by Multi Radiance Medical (Solon, OH, USA). Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied using the direct contact method with light pressure on the skin. The Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied in four regions of the epicondyle and the application time will be 60 seconds per region. The total dose of Placebo PBMT-sMF will be 0 J per treatment session and the sMF will be turned off. The sounds and signals emitted from the device as well as the information displayed on the screen will be identical, regardless of the type of treatment (active or placebo).

Sponsors

Multi Radiance Medical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Nove de Julho
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

A researcher will program the device (active PBMT-sMF or placebo PBMT-sMF) and will be instructed not to inform the patients or other researchers as to the type of treatment (active PBMT-sMF or placebo PBMT-sMF). Therefore, the researcher responsible for the treatment, the investigator and the outcome assessor will be blinded to the type of the treatment being administered to the patients. The sounds and signals emitted from the device as well as the information displayed on the screen will be identical, regardless of the type of treatment (active PBMT-sMF or placebo PBMT-sMF).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a history of pain around the lateral epicondyle for at least 1 month; * Self-reported Degree of Pain rating on the 0-100 VAS pain scale for the lateral epicondyle region is 50 or greater; * Tenderness localized to the epicondyle and anterodistal region of the epicondyle with palpation; * 2 of 4 positive results of provocative tests comprising of Maudsley's, Cozen's, Thomsen and Mill's tests; * Aged between 18 and 50 years; * Both genders; * Patients fluent in Portuguese.

Exclusion criteria

* hemophilia or any type of blood clotting disorder; * chronic immune impairment neoplasia; * cancer or treatment for cancer in the past 6 months, including tumors of the spinal cord; * diabetes Type 1; * significant heart conditions including CHF and implantable heart devices such as a pacemaker; * current, active chronic pain disease: chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, endometriosis, inflammatory bowel disease, interstitial cystitis diabetic neuropathic pain; * neurologic deficits; * cervical radiculopathy; * peripheral nerve disease; * rheumatoid arthritis; * shoulder disease; * radial tunnel syndrome; * previous surgery of the affected upper extremities; * congenital or acquired bony deformity in the ipsilateral upper extremity; * bilateral epicondylosis; * secondary orthopedic problems; * the initiation of opioid analgesia or corticosteroid or analgesic injection interventions within the previous 6 months; * local corticosteroids and/or botulinum toxin (Botox®) injection for Lateral Epicondyle pain relief within the prior 30 days; * medical tx; such as chiropractic care and acupuncture within last 30 days; * physical therapy intervention on the upper extremity in the previous year; * active infection, wound, or other external trauma to the areas to be treated with the laser; * medical, physical, or other contraindications for, or sensitivity to, light therapy; * serious mental health illness such as dementia or schizophrenia; psychiatric hospitalization in past two years; * pregnant, breast feeding, or planning pregnancy prior to the end of study participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Degree of Pain Rating (VAS)3 weeks (end of treatment)Degree of pain rating will be measured by 0-100 horizontal Visual Analog Pain Scale, with with 0 being 'no pain' and 100 'the worst possible pain'

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Grip Strength3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.The grip strength will be measured using a digital grip dynamometer type Jamar® Plus Digital Hand Dynamometer.
TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) Levels3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.The TNF-α levels will be measured by blood samples through the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Forearm Pain and Disability3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.Were measured using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), a 15-item questionnaire comprising five items related to pain and ten items related to function. Each item is rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain or difficulty and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain or complete inability to perform the activity. The pain subscale score is obtained by summing the five pain items, yielding a maximum score of 50. The function subscale is calculated by summing the ten function items and dividing the total by 2, also resulting in a maximum score of 50. The total PRTEE score is the sum of the pain and function subscale scores, ranging from 0 (no pain or disability) to 100 (maximum pain and disability), with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Presence of Adverse Events3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.Adverse events will be measured by report.
Degree of Pain Rating (VAS)4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.Degree of pain rating will be measured by 0-100 horizontal Visual Analog Pain Scale, with with 0 being 'no pain' and 100 'the worst possible pain'
Subject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.Subject satisfaction will be measured by 1-item Likert Scale. The scale uses the following responses: 5 = Very Satisfied; 4 = Somewhat Satisfied; 3 = Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied; 2 = Not Very Satisfied; 1 = Not at All Satisfied. Highest scores indicates better satisfaction.

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active PBMT-sMF
Active PBMT-sMF will be applied two times a week (three to four days apart), for three consecutive weeks, yielding six treatment sessions. Active PBMT-sMF: The Active PBMT-sMF will be applied using MRM® MR5 Prototype manufactured by Multi Radiance Medical (Solon, OH, USA). PBMT-sMF will be applied using the direct contact method with light pressure on the skin. The PBMT-sMF will be applied in four regions of the epicondyle and the application time will be 60 seconds per region. The total dose of PBMT-sMF will be 108,30 J per treatment session.
25
Placebo PBMT-sMF
Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied two times a week (three to four days apart), for three consecutive weeks, yielding six treatment sessions. Placebo PBMT-sMF: The Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied using MRM® MR5 Prototype manufactured by Multi Radiance Medical (Solon, OH, USA). Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied using the direct contact method with light pressure on the skin. The Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied in four regions of the epicondyle and the application time will be 60 seconds per region. The total dose of Placebo PBMT-sMF will be 0 J per treatment session and the sMF will be turned off. The sounds and signals emitted from the device as well as the information displayed on the screen will be identical, regardless of the type of treatment (active or placebo).
25
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo PBMT-sMFActive PBMT-sMFTotal
Age, Continuous35.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.77
34.64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.82
34.88 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74
Degree of pain rating (VAS)75.60 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64
79.36 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.19
77.48 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Forearm Pain and Disability59.28 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.48
58.26 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.45
58.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Grip Strength
Affected/Treated Limb
24.24 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.04
23.13 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.16
23.69 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.19
Grip Strength
Unaffected/ Untreated Limb
27.55 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.46
24.71 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.77
26.13 kgf
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.38
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
13 Participants10 Participants23 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
4 Participants10 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) Levels36.66 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.96
35.75 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.99
36.20 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.01

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 253 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Degree of Pain Rating (VAS)

Degree of pain rating will be measured by 0-100 horizontal Visual Analog Pain Scale, with with 0 being 'no pain' and 100 'the worst possible pain'

Time frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active PBMT-sMFDegree of Pain Rating (VAS)36.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.64
Placebo PBMT-sMFDegree of Pain Rating (VAS)51.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.84
Secondary

Degree of Pain Rating (VAS)

Degree of pain rating will be measured by 0-100 horizontal Visual Analog Pain Scale, with with 0 being 'no pain' and 100 'the worst possible pain'

Time frame: 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active PBMT-sMFDegree of Pain Rating (VAS)20.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.24
Placebo PBMT-sMFDegree of Pain Rating (VAS)37.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.08
Secondary

Forearm Pain and Disability

Were measured using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), a 15-item questionnaire comprising five items related to pain and ten items related to function. Each item is rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain or difficulty and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain or complete inability to perform the activity. The pain subscale score is obtained by summing the five pain items, yielding a maximum score of 50. The function subscale is calculated by summing the ten function items and dividing the total by 2, also resulting in a maximum score of 50. The total PRTEE score is the sum of the pain and function subscale scores, ranging from 0 (no pain or disability) to 100 (maximum pain and disability), with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

Time frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active PBMT-sMFForearm Pain and DisabilityTotal scores - 3 weeks (end of treatment)39.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.53
Active PBMT-sMFForearm Pain and DisabilityTotal scores - 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment29.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.67
Active PBMT-sMFForearm Pain and DisabilityFunction scores - 3 weeks (end of treatment)14.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.22
Active PBMT-sMFForearm Pain and DisabilityFunction scores - 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment10.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.09
Placebo PBMT-sMFForearm Pain and DisabilityFunction scores - 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment11.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Placebo PBMT-sMFForearm Pain and DisabilityTotal scores - 3 weeks (end of treatment)40.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.61
Placebo PBMT-sMFForearm Pain and DisabilityFunction scores - 3 weeks (end of treatment)15.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.61
Placebo PBMT-sMFForearm Pain and DisabilityTotal scores - 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment33.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.68
Secondary

Grip Strength

The grip strength will be measured using a digital grip dynamometer type Jamar® Plus Digital Hand Dynamometer.

Time frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active PBMT-sMFGrip Strength3 weeks (end of treatment) - Affected/Treated Limb25.07 kgfStandard Deviation 8.83
Active PBMT-sMFGrip Strength4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment - Affected/Treated Limb25.97 kgfStandard Deviation 7.53
Active PBMT-sMFGrip Strength3 weeks (end of treatment) - Unaffected/Untreated Limb25.45 kgfStandard Deviation 9.28
Active PBMT-sMFGrip Strength4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment - Unaffected/Untreated Limb26.07 kgfStandard Deviation 8.72
Placebo PBMT-sMFGrip Strength4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment - Unaffected/Untreated Limb28.39 kgfStandard Deviation 11.23
Placebo PBMT-sMFGrip Strength3 weeks (end of treatment) - Affected/Treated Limb26.37 kgfStandard Deviation 12.7
Placebo PBMT-sMFGrip Strength3 weeks (end of treatment) - Unaffected/Untreated Limb26.67 kgfStandard Deviation 12.57
Placebo PBMT-sMFGrip Strength4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment - Affected/Treated Limb27.72 kgfStandard Deviation 12.6
Secondary

Presence of Adverse Events

Adverse events will be measured by report.

Time frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active PBMT-sMFPresence of Adverse EventsTingling sensation0 participants
Active PBMT-sMFPresence of Adverse EventsBiting sensation1 participants
Active PBMT-sMFPresence of Adverse EventsHeating of skin sensation1 participants
Active PBMT-sMFPresence of Adverse EventsPain and discomfort0 participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFPresence of Adverse EventsPain and discomfort2 participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFPresence of Adverse EventsTingling sensation1 participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFPresence of Adverse EventsHeating of skin sensation0 participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFPresence of Adverse EventsBiting sensation0 participants
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating

Subject satisfaction will be measured by 1-item Likert Scale. The scale uses the following responses: 5 = Very Satisfied; 4 = Somewhat Satisfied; 3 = Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied; 2 = Not Very Satisfied; 1 = Not at All Satisfied. Highest scores indicates better satisfaction.

Time frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Very satisfied18 Participants
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Somewhat Satisfied6 Participants
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Neither1 Participants
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Not Very Satisfied0 Participants
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Not at All Satisfied0 Participants
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentVery satisfied21 Participants
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentSomewhat Satisfied3 Participants
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentNeither1 Participants
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentNot Very Satisfied0 Participants
Active PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentNot at All Satisfied0 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentNeither3 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Very satisfied16 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentVery satisfied18 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Somewhat Satisfied6 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentNot at All Satisfied0 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Neither1 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentSomewhat Satisfied3 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Not Very Satisfied2 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatmentNot Very Satisfied1 Participants
Placebo PBMT-sMFSubject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating3 weeks (end of treatment)Not at All Satisfied0 Participants
Secondary

TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) Levels

The TNF-α levels will be measured by blood samples through the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active PBMT-sMFTNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) Levels3 weeks (end of treatment)25.77 pg/mlStandard Deviation 4.9
Active PBMT-sMFTNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) Levels4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment26.45 pg/mlStandard Deviation 5.69
Placebo PBMT-sMFTNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) Levels3 weeks (end of treatment)33.14 pg/mlStandard Deviation 4.71
Placebo PBMT-sMFTNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) Levels4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment32.00 pg/mlStandard Deviation 6.11

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026