Skip to content

Optimizing Daily Mindfulness Interventions Using Peer Support to Increase Well-Being in First-Year Students

Optimizing Daily Mindfulness Interventions Using Peer Support to Increase Well-Being in First-Year Students

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04828291
Enrollment
180
Registered
2021-04-02
Start date
2020-02-03
Completion date
2021-05-31
Last updated
2021-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

OMI, OMI+, Control Group

Brief summary

This project aims to examine the effect of a self-guided, evidence-based, online mindfulness intervention on well-being among first-year undergraduates at the 5 Claremont Colleges (5C's) and graduate students in the community. Additionally, it explores the feasibility and efficacy of peer support (pairs) as an adjunctive treatment component to enhance engagement and treatment effects, including social-connectedness, well- being, academic outcomes, and anxiety. Findings will provide insight into effective ways to (1) support students at The Claremont Colleges, and (2) leverage technology and peer support to implement mental health initiatives that are cost-effective, easily transportable, and scalable in low-resource settings.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBenign Behavioral Interventions

This project will use a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) design and Daily Reconstruction Method (DRM8) to model the effects of the OMI on dynamic changes in first-year undergraduate and graduate students' well-being over time. The intervention will take place over the course of 46 days, with a 7- day follow up assessment taking place one month after the intervention. People will complete surveys through an online link leading to Qualtrics.com.

Sponsors

Pitzer College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all participants must be either a first-year undergraduate student or a graduate student. Participants must be 18 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

* all participants must be either a first-year undergraduate student or a graduate student. Participants must be 18 years or older.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)Baseline to Day 46The FFMQ is a self-reported, instrument assessing mindfulness based on five factors that represent elements of mindfulness ( observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non-reactivity to inner experience). Possible scores range from 1 (never or very rarely true) to 5 (very often or always true). Reference: Bohlmeijer, E., P. M. ten Klooster, et al. (2011). Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment 18(3): 308-320

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sample AttritionBaseline to Day 46Completion rate or drop out rate comparing OMI group versus OMI+ group in a 46 day longitudinal study.
PERMA (Overall Well Being)Day 0-46The self-reported measure consists of 23 items. The health, negative emotion, loneliness, and overall happiness questions act as filler questions and provide more information; for briefness, the 15 PERMA questions (3 per PERMA domain) could be used, but we recommend using the full measure. Reference: Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016). The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(3), 1-48. doi:10.5502/ijw.v6i3.1

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-Report Health (SF-36)BaselineSF-36 is a self-reported instrument assessing easily administered quality-of-life measures which consists of 8 subscales. These measures rely upon patient self-reporting and are now widely utilized by managed care organizations and by Medicare for routine monitoring and assessment of care outcomes in adult patients. Reference: Ware, IE. Jr., Snow, K.K, Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: Nimrod Press.
Academic Motivation ScaleDay 38The Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) is a validated, self-reported, seven point Likert type item scale that measures Intrinsic, extrinsic, and Amotivation in education. Possible scores range from 1 (does not correspond at all) to 7 (corresponds exactly). Reference: Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C. B., & Vallières, É. F. (1993). Academic motivation scale (ams-c 28) college (cegep) version. Educ Psychol Meas, 52, 1003-17.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJaymes Paolo Rombaoa, PhD candidate
jaymes.paolo-rombaoa@cgu.edu(714) 231-7461
Backup ContactMarcus Rodriguez, PhD
Marcus_Rodriguez@pitzer.edu

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026