Skip to content

Clinical Trial of Multi-Periscopic Prism Glasses for Hemianopia

Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial of Multi-Periscopic Prism Glasses for Homonymous Hemianopia

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04827147
Enrollment
64
Registered
2021-04-01
Start date
2023-04-03
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2026-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Homonymous Hemianopia

Brief summary

This clinical trial will evaluate the efficacy of two types of high-power prism glasses that provide field of view expansion for patients with homonymous hemianopia (the complete loss of half the field of vision on the same side in both eyes).

Detailed description

Patients with hemianopic field loss may be unaware of objects in their blind (non-seeing) hemi-field and often experience difficulties with hazards, such as walking into obstacles on the side of the field loss. Prism glasses that provide field of view expansion may be helpful in detecting hazards on the blind side. In this clinical trial, two types of high power prism glasses will be evaluated. A new design of prisms, Multi-Periscopic Prisms (MPP), will be compared to commercially-available permanent Fresnel peripheral prism (FPP) glasses. The extent to which the prismatic devices improve detection of hazards on the side of the field loss and are helpful when walking will be evaluated. Participants will try each type of prism glasses at home for 4 weeks in counterbalanced order. Prism glasses will be fitted by Low Vision Practitioners at vision rehabilitation clinics. Participants will attend in-office study visits before and after wearing each type of prism glasses. At the in-office visits they will complete a test that involves detecting pedestrian hazards in a video simulating a walk through a busy shopping mall (virtual reality, VR, walking simulator test). In addition, they may be asked to complete questionnaires to record their experiences of using the prism glasses. After wearing the second pair of prism glasses, participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire comparing the two types of prism glasses and to select their preferred type. A clinical decision will be made as to whether the participant should continue to use either the first or second pair of prism glasses (e.g. if a participant finds one pair of prism glasses helpful for obstacle avoidance when walking). For participants who continue with the prism glasses, telephone follow-up interviews will be conducted after about 6 and 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICEMulti-Periscopic Prism (MPP) glasses

Spectacles with multi-periscopic prisms mounted as oblique peripheral prism segments

DEVICEFresnel Peripheral Prism (FPP) glasses

Spectacles with conventional permanent Fresnel prisms mounted as oblique peripheral prism segments

Sponsors

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Eye Institute (NEI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Homonymous hemianopia with or without macular sparing for at least 3 months * Visual acuity of at least 20/50 in each eye, with correction if needed * Refractive error in the -12D to +5D range * Able to walk independently, using a cane or walker if needed * Able to communicate in English sufficiently to understand the study procedures and how to use the prisms

Exclusion criteria

* Central visual field loss in the seeing hemifield of either eye (e.g. from macular degeneration, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy or other maculopathies) * Hemi-spatial neglect * Significant cognitive impairment * Dementia * Any other physical or mental disabilities, or general health problems that could impair the ability to be independently mobile (i.e., walk ), participate in the VR walking simulator test or use the prism glasses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Blind-side Detection Rate for Hazards Approaching at a Bearing Angle of 40 DegreesImmediately after each 4-week interventionImprovement in detection rate with prism glasses for hazards approaching from the blind side at a bearing angle of 40 degrees in the VR walking simulator test. Improvement is a binary outcome, defined as blind-side detection rate (number of pedestrians detected as a percentage of the total number of pedestrian events) which is significantly higher (z-test for two proportions) with than without prism glasses at the same visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Blind-side Detection Rate for Hazards Approaching at a Bearing Angle of 20 DegreesImmediately after each 4-week interventionImprovement in detection rate with prism glasses for hazards approaching from the blind side at a bearing angle of 20 degrees in the VR walking simulator test. Improvement is a binary outcome, defined as blind-side detection rate (number of pedestrians detected as a percentage of the total number of pedestrian events) which is significantly higher (z-test for two proportions) with than without prism glasses at the same visit.
Device PreferenceImmediately after the second 4-week interventionNumber of participants selecting each device as a percentage of the total number of participants enrolled

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREli Peli, OD MSc

Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited between April 2023 and November 2024 at seven vision rehabilitation clinics in the United States, including three university clinics, three academic medical centers and one private practice.

Pre-assignment details

64 participants were screened. 26 did not meet eligibility criteria and were excluded All 38 participants who met eligibility criteria were allocated to receive either MPP first (n=19) or FPP first (n=19). One allocation was mistakenly swopped; therefore 18 participants started in the MPP first group and 20 in the FPP first group.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous57 Years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 380 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 38

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 20, 2026