Skip to content

Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block

Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Gynacological Cancer Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04827043
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-04-01
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2021-09-30
Last updated
2021-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Analgesia

Keywords

Quadratus lumborum block, Thoracic paravertebral block, Postoperative analgesia

Brief summary

This study is to assess and compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of quadratus lumbotum block and paravertebral block in gynacological cancer patients.

Detailed description

All patients will be medically checked in the preoperative assessment clinic {history, physical examination, investigations (e.g. complete blood picture, coagulation profile , liver & kidney functions , ECG for patient above 40 years, chest x-ray for patients above 60 years and any other necessary investigations required for risky patients. ) }. The patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups(25 patients for each group) with a computer-generated list (www.Random.org). QLB group: will receive 0.3ml/Kg bupivacaine 0.25% ( keeping in mind not to exceed the maximum recommended toxic dose of plain bupivacaine which is 2.5 mg/Kg & 3mg/Kg with epinephrine). PVB group: will receive 0.25ml/Kg/side of 0.375% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5ug/ml, yielding the same dose of bupivacaine of 1.875mg/ml at the level of T10. * In the recovery room, the patients will be continuous monitored for pulse, blood pressure, oxygen saturation. * Humidified oxygen 3L/min. by nasal prong will be delivered to all patients. * Portable ultrasound machine , nerve stimulator, pressure injector monitor ,resuscitation equipment &drugs (e.g. epinephrine, lipid emulsion ), sterile gloves and surgical towels should be available. * Intravenous(IV) 18 gauge cannula will be inserted. Midazolam 0.02 mg/Kg will be administered. While the patients in the supine or lateral position, they will receive bilateral single injection ultrasound guided QLBs under complete sterilization of the abdomen with sterile solution (iodine povacryl & isopropyl alcohol solution). All patients will be monitored throughout the performance of the block & all data will be recorded. A linear ultrasound transducer probe (6-13MHZ), or curved probe (according to patients BMI). ( Sonosite M-turbo; Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) in a sterile cover will be placed at the level of the anterosuperior iliac spine and moved cranially until the three muscle layers of the abdomen will be identified: external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles. The external oblique muscle will be followed posterolaterally until its posterior border visualize (hook sign) leaving underneath the internal oblique muscle, like a roof over the QL muscle. The probe will be tilted down to identify a bright hyperechoic line that corresponded with the intermediate layer of the thoracolumber fascia(Blanco et al.,2015). A 21 gauge blunt, insulated, echogenic needle will be inserted in plane . The optimal point of injection will be determined using hydrodissection (3-5 mL normal saline). The site of the needle will be confirmed in place by ultrasound guided, nerve stimulator (B- Braun) & pressure injector monitor. After negative aspiration, we will inject 0.3mL/Kg bupivacaine 0.25% in each side in QLB group. The patients will be monitored for about 20-30 minutes before induction of anesthesia. While the TPVB will be performed by single injections at the level of T10 vertebra. The patients will be placed in the sitting position, and the spinal process of T10 will be palpated. Then a linear ultrasound transducer probe (6-13 MHZ). ( Sonosite M-turbo; Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) in a sterile cover will be placed at the corresponding transverse process to be clearly visualized and the skin-transverse process distance will be measured on both sides. After infiltration of the skin and subcutaneous tissue with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine 5ug/ml, an 18G Touphy needle will be inserted perpendicular to the skin, approximately 2.5 cm from midline, until contact with the transverse process will be established ( It is important to visualize the pleura very clearly at all times ). The needle will then slightly withdrawal & reinserted 1-1.5 cm deeper either caudally or cranially for the transverse process (TP). The site of the needle will be confirmed in place by ultrasound guided, nerve stimulator (B- Braun) & pressure injector monitor. After careful aspiration, patients will be received a slow injection of 0.25mL/Kg/side of 0.375% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5ug/ml at the level of T10. The patients will be monitored for about 30 minutes before induction of anesthesia. Induction of general anesthesia will be done. After full awakening from anesthesia, the patient will be transferred to the recovery room. In the recovery room, the patient will be continuous monitored & humidified oxygen will be applied for about 1 hour. Then a standardized analgesic regimen consisting of regular IV/oral paracetamol 1g every 6 hours combined with PCA morphine (on demand) will be initiated. Patients required additional analgesia will be received IV ketorolac(15-30mg). A trained anesthetist not involved in the study & blinded to the patient group will measure the VAS, morphine requirements & patient satisfaction.

Interventions

prospective randomized comparative study between Group (1) : quadratus lumborum block

PVB group: will receive 0.25ml/Kg/side of 0.375% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5ug/ml, yielding the same dose of bupivacaine of 1.875mg/ml at the level of T10 as a single injection sonar guided.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Cancer Institute, Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

After approval of The InstitutionalEthics Committee of The National Cancer Institute ,Cairo University, 50 patients scheduled for gynacological cancer surgery will be enrolled in this study

Intervention model description

A prospective randomized comparative study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\. Inclusion criteria 1. ASA I-III. 2. Age ≥ 20 & ≤ 70 3. Body mass index (BMI): Less than forty and more than twenty. 4. Patients undergoing major gynacological cancer surgeries. 2\.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient refusal. 2. History of sensitivity to local anesthetic (amide group). 3. History of psychological disorders. 4. Coagulopathies: hereditary (e.g. hemophilia, fibrinogen abnormalities& deficiency of factor II) - acquired (e.g. liver disease, vitamin K deficiency & therapeutic anticoagulants drugs). 5. Localized infection. 6. Morbid obese BMI\>40. 7. Incooperative patients. 8. Patients on chronic pain therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analogue scaleBaseline pain till first 24 hours postoperativePain score will be measured according to severity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Morphine demands postoperativeFirst 24 hours postoperativeThe amount of morphine required to relieve pain will be recorded
Patient satisfactionFirst 24 hours postoperativePatient satisfaction measured by visual analogue score

Contacts

Primary ContactFatma G Hussein, master
fatmagomaa54p@gmail.com00201023431090

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026