Covid19, Respiratory Viral Infection, Tuberculosis
Conditions
Keywords
PPE, mask, N95, pandemic, mask shortage
Brief summary
This study will test the filtration, air leak, and breathability of a newly designed fully washable mask developed by Dr. Nordell with the Mayo Clinic. This mask is theorized to be a superior alternative to other respirators currently used when one-time-use N95 masks are unavailable.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine potential effectiveness of a new, reusable mask against SARS-CoV-2 and other microbes. This requires filtering down to at least 0.3 microns, as the SARS-CoV-2 virus is on average 0.25-0.5 microns in diameter. Dr. Nordell has developed a machine-washable mask which shows potential to be significantly more effective than other masks on the market. It uses a fabric that is machine washable, without need for a filter or replaceable component. This fabric, Evolon-100 or E-100, is a microfilament fabric produced by a private company outside of the USA (and is therefore not yet FDA approved as of December 2020). Unofficial data shows this mask passes the N95 fit test before and after multiple washes on the majority of individuals tested, and the material used in Dr. Nordell's design filters 93-96% of 0.3 micron particles. For reference, the N95 mask used in the hospital (whenever concern for potential exposure to COVID-19 or similar contagion exists) filters 95% of 0.3 micron particles when factoring in air leak, assessed with the fit test. Voluntary survey of users also shows it is more comfortable than other masks, including the N95. This mask is also reported to be breathable even after prolonged use. This mask design addresses every factor in respirator design. The design intentionally uses pleats to increase the effective mask surface area while decreasing the seal perimeter, resulting in increased air flow, lower pressure drop, and increased filtration efficiency. The investigators propose that it has a higher filtration ability than other washable fabrics tested, filtering at least 93% of 0.3 micron particles, even up to 96%. It also helps prevent air leak, a large factor limiting efficacy of most non-standard masks. It is easy to don and doff, and it is very easy to clean and disinfect. This material can be washed multiple times in a standard washing machine without reducing its effectiveness. And finally, it is very affordable, with materials for one mask costing less than $1.50. All materials used beyond this specific fabric are easily purchased on the internet or in a fabric store. Upon completion of this research, the investigators hope to demonstrate that this mask is a superior alternative in multiple settings, including hospitals in developing countries with little or no N95 mask access, non-hospital settings such as businesses and schools, as well as for the general population, especially those with high risk for COVID-related complications.
Interventions
Standard 1870 N95 one time use mask
Nordell mask design using one layer of E-100 fabric plus cotton fabric overlay
Nordell mask design using two layers of E-100 fabric
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Current employee of Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato * Passed N95 fit test within the past year * No medical history of: high blood pressure, current or recent pneumonia or upper respiratory infection, and no uncontrolled chronic asthma * Ideally with wide representation of genders, race, age, BMI, occupation/role in hospital. * Willing and able to provde verbal consent.
Exclusion criteria
\- History of uncontrolled asthma, pneumonia, or hypertension.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Fit Tests | Baseline | Number of participants to pass the respirator fit testing using Bitrix solution. If participants do not smell or taste the solution while wearing the respirator it is considered passed. |
| Comfort Level of Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | Baseline | Measured by a self-reported questionnaire that rates the comfort level of the Nordell Double E-100 layer mask on a scale from 0 to 5 (0 is the most uncomfortable mask ever worn, 5 is the best, most comfortable mask) |
| Ability to Breathe With Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | Baseline | Measured by a self-reported questionnaire that rates ability to breathe comfortably while wearing the Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask, from 0 (not able to breathe at all) to 5 (just as easy to breathe as not wearing any mask) |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Health Care Workers Health care workers will complete a fit test while wearing the Nordell Single E-100 layer + (cotton layer) mask, Nordell Double E-100 layer mask and an N95 mask
N95 mask: Standard 1870 N95 one time use mask
Nordell single E-100 layer mask: Nordell mask design using one layer of E-100 fabric plus cotton fabric overlay
Nordell double E-100 layer mask: Nordell mask design using two layers of E-100 fabric | 41 |
| Total | 41 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Health Care Workers |
|---|---|
| Age, Customized >= 60 years | 4 Participants |
| Age, Customized Between 18 and 29 years | 3 Participants |
| Age, Customized Between 30 and 39 years | 15 Participants |
| Age, Customized Between 40 and 49 years | 11 Participants |
| Age, Customized Between 50 and 59 years | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian/Pacific Islander | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black/African American | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White, non-Hispanic | 37 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 41 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 34 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 41 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 41 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 41 |
Outcome results
Ability to Breathe With Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask
Measured by a self-reported questionnaire that rates ability to breathe comfortably while wearing the Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask, from 0 (not able to breathe at all) to 5 (just as easy to breathe as not wearing any mask)
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Care Workers | Ability to Breathe With Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 0 (worst) | 0 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Ability to Breathe With Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 1 | 0 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Ability to Breathe With Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 2 | 1 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Ability to Breathe With Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 3 | 4 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Ability to Breathe With Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 4 | 11 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Ability to Breathe With Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 5 (best) | 25 Participants |
Comfort Level of Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask
Measured by a self-reported questionnaire that rates the comfort level of the Nordell Double E-100 layer mask on a scale from 0 to 5 (0 is the most uncomfortable mask ever worn, 5 is the best, most comfortable mask)
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Care Workers | Comfort Level of Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 0 = most uncomfortable | 0 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Comfort Level of Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 1 | 1 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Comfort Level of Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 2 | 0 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Comfort Level of Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 3 | 4 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Comfort Level of Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 4 | 22 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Comfort Level of Nordell Double E-100 Layer Mask | 5 = most comfortable | 14 Participants |
Comparison of Fit Tests
Number of participants to pass the respirator fit testing using Bitrix solution. If participants do not smell or taste the solution while wearing the respirator it is considered passed.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: One participant was excluded from analysis of this outcome measure due to recent viral illness
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Care Workers | Comparison of Fit Tests | Fit Test N95 | 39 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Comparison of Fit Tests | Fit Test Nordell Single Layer Mask | 39 Participants |
| Health Care Workers | Comparison of Fit Tests | Fit Test Nordell Double Layer Mask | 40 Participants |