Skip to content

Use of Various Laser Systems in Peri-implatit

Effect of Various Laser Systems in Smokers and Nonsmokers With Peri-implantitis: A Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blind Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04826783
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-04-01
Start date
2021-04-25
Completion date
2022-04-25
Last updated
2021-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis

Brief summary

Objectives: In recent years, a new field of work has been created with the use of laser beam to provide titanium surface decontamination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various laser systems in smokers and non-smokers with peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: According to the study protocol, patients, who were diagnosed with peri-implantitis based on the clinical and radiographic evaluations, were divided into six groups: Group 1: smokers undergoing diode laser application; Group 2: smokers undergoing Erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser application; Group 3: smokers undergoing Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser application; Group 4: non-smokers undergoing diode laser application; Group 5: non-smokers undergoing Er, Cr:YSGG laser application; and Group 6: non-smokers undergoing Er:YAG laser application. Peri-implant sulcus depth (SD), clinical attachment level (CAL), suppuration, modified plaque index (mPI), gingival index (GI), and modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) were recorded and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) was collected to evaluate osteocalcin.

Interventions

DEVICELasers

The laser tip was applied as vertical and horizontal scan along the subgingival implant . The procedure was carried out on day zero, seven and 14.

Sponsors

Kırıkkale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Presence of pocket in probing depth of ≥4 mm in at least one implant 2. No mobility in implant 3. Implants with bridge foot and opposite occlusion 4. Having no systemic disease that may affect the outcome of treatment 5. No systemic use of antibiotics for the last six months 6. Not receiving peri-implantitis treatment for the last three months 7. Individuals at the 30-60 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

1. Individuals who did not agree to participate in the study 2. Individuals receiving radiation therapy 3. Individuals using alcohol 4. Presence of pregnancy and lactation period 5. Individuals with parafunctional habits such as clenching or bruxism.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sulcus depthbasaline - six month

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary Contactkubilay barış
dt.bkubilay@gmail.com05539736477

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026