Skip to content

Effectiveness of Coordinated Care to Reduce the Prolonged Disability Risk Among Patients Suffering From Low Back Pain in Primary Care

Effectiveness of Coordinated Care to Reduce the Risk of Prolonged Disability Among Patients Suffer From Subacute or Recurrent Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04826757
Acronym
COLOMB
Enrollment
220
Registered
2021-04-01
Start date
2022-09-21
Completion date
2027-02-22
Last updated
2026-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Brief summary

Common low back pain affects about 23% of general population and can be associated with psychosocial difficulties and prolonged inability to work. Its management in France mainly depends on general practioners, and sometime on physiotherapists. A coordinated care between general practioners, physiotherapists and occupational health services would help to improve the care pathway for patients and health professionals. The main objective is to assess the impact of coordinated primary care and deployed at the territories' level, in subacute or acute recurrent low back pain patients in comparison with the standard care.

Interventions

Coordinated care between general practioners; physiotherapists and occupational health services. Early contact with occupational health service by the general practioner and use of occupational retention tool Active physiotherapy (Individual active, intensive and regular rehabilitation program with 15 sessions of 1 hour, at a rate of 2 or 3 sessions per week)

Sponsors

University Hospital, Angers
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomised, controlled, cluster trial. the project is multicentered.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient consulting an investigator GP for subacute low back pain or acute recurrent low back pain * Patient with occupational activity (including sick leave) * Patient depending of occupational health service * Obtaining the signature of the consent to participate in this trial * Patient Registered with social security scheme Non-inclusion Criteria: * Specific low back pain (fracture, infection, osteoporosis, inflammatory disease, tumor) * Low back pain with sciatic, cruralgia * Contraindication to active reeducation * Impossibility to follow up during 12 months * Patient planning to retire within the 12 months following the enrollment * Disability to write or read french * Adult patient protected under the law (guardianship), * Pregnant, breastfeeding or parturient women * Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision * Persons subject to legal protection measures * Persons unable to consent * Persons on coercion psychiatric care * Physiotherapy by a physiotherapist who don't participate in this trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived inability at 1 yearEnrollment to 12 months follow upRatio of patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. The minimum value of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived inabilityEnrollment to 3 months follow up, Enrollment to 6 months follow upRatio of patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. The minimum value of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Roland Morris Disability score over timeEnrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsEvolution of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire over time. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Pain perceivedEnrollment - 3 months , Enrollment - 6 months and Enrollment -12 monthsRatio of patients presenting improvement equal or above 2 points of numerical pain scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Numerical pain scale over timeEnrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsEvolution of numerical pain scale over time. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Occupational statusat 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthsRatio of patients having an active occupation (defined by have an employment and be present at work )
Employment rateEnrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsEvolution of employment rate over time
Sick leaveduring 12 months after inclusionnumber of sick leave days
Improved patientsat 3 months, 6 months and 12 monthsRatio of improved patients. Improved patients is defined by patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and improvement equal or above 2 points of numerical pain scale and having a active occupational
Evolution of improved patients ratioEnrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsEvolution of improved patients ratio over time Improved patients is defined by patient presenting improvement equal or above 4 points of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and improvement equal or above 2 points of numerical pain scale and having a active occupational
Mental component score of Short Form -12Enrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsEvolution of mental scores over time The mental component score is determined by 4 categories of Short Form -12. The minimum value of each category is 0 and the maximun value is 100. A higher score mean better outcome
Physical component score of Short Form -12Enrollment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsEvolution of physical scores over time. The physical component score is determined by 4 categories of Short Form -12. The minimum value of each category is 0 and the maximun value is 100. A higher score mean better outcome
Occupational component score of Fear Avoidance Beliefs QuestionnaireEnrollment, 3 months, 12 monthsEvolution of occupational component score over time. Occupational component is assessed using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 42. A higher score mean worse outcome
Physical activity component score of Fear Avoidance Beliefs QuestionnaireEnrollment, 3 months, 12 monthsEvolution of physical activity component score over time. Physical activity component is assessed using the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 24. A higher score mean worse outcome
Anxiety component score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleEnrollment 3 months, 12 monthsEvolution of Anxiety score over time Anxiety Component is assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 21. A higher score mean worse outcome
Depression component score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleEnrollment, 3 months, 12 monthsEvolution of Depression score over time Depression component is assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 21. A higher score mean worse outcome
Coordination care score of Patient Centered Coordination by a Care Team questionnaireEnrollment, 3 months, 12 monthsEvolution of coordination care score over time This score is assessed by using Patient Centered Coordination by a Care Team questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 42. A higher score mean better outcome
GP satisfaction related to patient careT0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)Evolution of GP satisfaction using an numerical scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Physiotherapist satisfaction related to patient careT0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)Evolution of physiotherapist satisfaction using an numerical scale The minimum value is 0 and the maximun value is 10. A higher score mean worse outcome
Professionals trained for interventionBaseline intervention formationsnumber of professionals trained for intervention
Biomechanical component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for intervention physiotherapistsT0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)Evolution of Biomechanical component score for intervention physiotherapists. Biomechanical component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score. The minimum value is 10 and the maximun value is 60. A higher score mean worse outcome
Biopsychosocial component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for intervention physiotherapistsT0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)Evolution of Biopsychosocial component score for intervention physiotherapists. Biopsychosocial component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score.The minimum value is 9 and the maximun value is 54. A higher score mean better outcome
Biopsychosocial component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for GPsT0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)Evolution of Biopsychosocial component score for GPs. Biopsychosocial component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score.The minimum value is 9 and the maximun value is 54. A higher score mean better outcome
Biomechanical component score of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs score - for GPsT0 = baseline (cluster initiation); T1 = 1 year (6 months after inclusion of the 5th cluster patient); T2 = through study completion, an average of 3 years (12 months after the last cluster patient inclusion)Evolution of Biomechanical component score for GPs. Biomechanical component is assessed using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Score. The minimum value is 10 and the maximun value is 60. A higher score mean worse outcome
Professional dialoguesduring the 12 months of follow upExistence and types of dialogues between GP and other professionals
Number of consultations or sessionsduring the 12 months of follow upNumber of consultations or sessions

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAline RAMOND ROQUIN, MD-PHD

Department of Family Medicine - University of Angers

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 14, 2026