Skip to content

Clinical Investigation on the Performance and Safety of DermoRelizema Ecofoam

Multicenter, Open Label, Uncontrolled Clinical Investigation on the Performance and Safety of DermoRelizema Ecofoam in the Management of Some Dermatitis in the Adult

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04826471
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-04-01
Start date
2021-05-13
Completion date
2022-01-05
Last updated
2025-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dermatitis

Keywords

ecofoam, DermoRelizema ecofoam, dermatitis treatment, mild moderate dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis

Brief summary

The scope of this open label clinical trial is to evaluate and confirm the performance of DermoRelizema ecofoam in the improvement of the dermatitis severity, by alleviating the symptomatology. The disease severity will be clinically measured through the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) after 28 days of treatment.

Detailed description

The scope of this open label clinical trial is to evaluate and confirm the performance of DermoRelizema ecofoam in the improvement of the dermatitis severity, by alleviating the symptomatology. The product will be applied for 42 days of treatment, 2 times per day into the face. The dermatologist will perform 3 clinical follow up visits to assess the efficacy and safety of the product

Interventions

DEVICEDermoRelizema ecofoam

DermoRelizema ecofoam, class II a medical device, topical compact mousse, to be applied 2 times per day during the 42 days of study duration

Sponsors

Relife S.r.l.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Multicenter, open label, uncontrolled, single arm, post-market clinical folow-up study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject's written informed consent obtained prior to any studyrelated procedures; 2. Generally healthy male and female aged ≥ 18 years; 3. Presence of dermatitis of any typology, including atopic dermatitis (AD), irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) or allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), of mild-moderate severity: * IGA score 2 (=mild) or 3 (=moderate); 4. Dermatitis affecting one or more body areas (face, legs, arms, etc.); 5. Subjects with cooperative attitude, able to comprehend the full nature and the purpose of the investigation, including possible risks and side effects, and able to comply with the requirements of the entire investigation (including ability to attend the planned visits according to the time limits), based on Investigator's judgement.

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe dermatitis at inclusion; 2. Pregnant and breastfeeding women; 3. Concomitant other skin disorders including skin infections; 4. Currently or previously diagnosed or treated (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) for cancer in the past 5 years; 5. History of previous skin cancer (history of non-metastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin is allowed); 6. Active infections or use of antibiotics in the past 7 days; 7. Diabetic subjects; 8. History of congenital or acquired immunodepression; 9. Immunologic or infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis, HIV or AIDS, any typology of lupus, rheumatoid arthritis) which could place the subject at risk or interfere with study results; 10. Use of any topic medication for dermatitis in the past 14 days; 11. Use of any topic product for dermatitis in the 2 days before study treatment start; 12. Any systemic treatment or procedure that could influence dermatitis activity within the past 30 days (or 5 half-lives); 13. Use of any corticosteroids, immunosuppressant drugs or immunotherapy within the past 30 days (or 5 half-lives); 14. Use of oral antihistamines and antidepressants in the past 30 days; 15. Subjects with any other clinically significant or unstable concurrent disease or skin condition or general condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, might interfere with the study evaluations; 16. Allergy, sensitivity or intolerance to the components of the investigational device formulations ingredients; 17. Concomitant or previous participation in other interventional clinical study in the past 3 months; 18. Subjects planning sun exposure or tanning booths or UV sources throughout the course of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Partecipants With Improvement of Dermatitis Severity28 days of treatmentThe primary endpoint was the change from baseline ( visit 1) to day 28 ( visit 3) in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and the assestment was also dichotomized in terms of treatment success or treatment failure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eczema Area and Severity Index Scoresto 14, 28 and 42 days of treatmentto evaluate the eczema improvement through the EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) score. Severity strata for the EASI were as follows: 0 = clear; 01-1.0 = almost clear; 1.1-7.0 = mild; 7.1-21.0 = moderate; 21.1-50.0 = severe; 50.1-72.0 = very severe
VAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitsto 14, 28 and 42 days of treatmentto evaluate the improvement in pain and pruritus at visits, as reported by the subject at visits by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). The subject was requested to indicate at each visit his/her pruritus, itching, burning and pain by placing a vertical mark along a 100 mm VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). The rating was recorded as a distance from the left side of the scale (0 mm) to the mark made by the patient.
Percentage of Partecipants With Improvement in the Quality of Life (QoL)to 14, 28 and 42 days of treatmentto evaluate improvement in the Quality of Life (QoL) of the subject related to his/her dermatitis, through the DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) questionnaire; DLQI is a questionnaire used to measure the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. There are 10 questions, covering the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, treatment. Each question refers to the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week. Each question was scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life). Global score: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life 2-5 = Small effect 6-10 = Moderate effect 11-20 = Very large effect 21-30 = Extremely large effect.
Percentage of Partecipants With Improvement of the Dermatitis Severityafter 14 and 42 days of treatmentto evaluate the performance of the DermoRelizema ecofoam in the improvement of dermatitis severity (IGA) after 14 and 42 days of treatment;
Percentage of Patient With Improvement of Performance by IGAat the end of the study ( day 42)to evaluate the subject's and Investigator's global evaluation of performance of DermoRelizema ecofoam by means of a 7-items scale (where 1 = very much improved, 2 = improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = worse, 7 = very much worse)
Percentage of Partecipants Who Indicated That the Treatment Was Acceptableat the end of the study ( day 42)to evaluate the subject's overall acceptability of the treatment (which takes into account pleasant or unpleasant feeling with the product and the ease of use), performed by means of a 5-item scale (where 1 = very much satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied, 5 = very much dissatisfied)
Number of Partecipants With Adherence to Treatment.to 14, 28 and 42 days of treatmentnumber of partecipants with adherence to treatment.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 40 subject were enrolled in the study, signed the informed consent forms, attended the first visit and 40 started the treatment. Among them, 6 subjects withdrew from the study between V1 and V4 ( 3 subjects because they needed to start a not allowed medication, 2 were lost to follow-up and 1 withdrew the consent). Based on this, 34 subjects, out of 40, regularly completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DermoReizema Ecofoam for 42 Days, 2 Times Per Day
DermoRelizema ecofoam is a topical compact mousse, to be applied 2 times per day, the first application in the morning and the second in the evening before bed time, for 42 consecutive days.
37
Total37

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyProtocol Violation3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDermoReizema Ecofoam for 42 Days, 2 Times Per Day
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
37 Participants
Number of partecipants with clinical diagnosis of dermatitis of mild-moderate severity:IGA score 2-337 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
37 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
37 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Partecipants With Improvement of Dermatitis Severity

The primary endpoint was the change from baseline ( visit 1) to day 28 ( visit 3) in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) and the assestment was also dichotomized in terms of treatment success or treatment failure

Time frame: 28 days of treatment

Population: Primary endpoint data was analyzed in the FAS population and the analysis was then repeated in the PPAS population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DermoRelizema EcofoamNumber of Partecipants With Improvement of Dermatitis Severity37 Participants
Secondary

Eczema Area and Severity Index Scores

to evaluate the eczema improvement through the EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) score. Severity strata for the EASI were as follows: 0 = clear; 01-1.0 = almost clear; 1.1-7.0 = mild; 7.1-21.0 = moderate; 21.1-50.0 = severe; 50.1-72.0 = very severe

Time frame: to 14, 28 and 42 days of treatment

Population: EASI score change from baseline to every following time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DermoRelizema EcofoamEczema Area and Severity Index Scoresafter 14 days1.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
DermoRelizema EcofoamEczema Area and Severity Index Scoresafter 28 days0.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
DermoRelizema EcofoamEczema Area and Severity Index Scoresbaseline2.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
DermoRelizema EcofoamEczema Area and Severity Index Scoresafter 42 days0.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Secondary

Number of Partecipants With Adherence to Treatment.

number of partecipants with adherence to treatment.

Time frame: to 14, 28 and 42 days of treatment

Population: The subject's adherence to treatment was assessed through the number of applications reported on the subject's diary.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DermoRelizema EcofoamNumber of Partecipants With Adherence to Treatment.36 number of partecipant
Secondary

Percentage of Partecipants Who Indicated That the Treatment Was Acceptable

to evaluate the subject's overall acceptability of the treatment (which takes into account pleasant or unpleasant feeling with the product and the ease of use), performed by means of a 5-item scale (where 1 = very much satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied, 5 = very much dissatisfied)

Time frame: at the end of the study ( day 42)

Population: the acceptability was obteined by means of a 5 item scale will be summarized through number and the proportion of subject for each item

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DermoRelizema EcofoamPercentage of Partecipants Who Indicated That the Treatment Was Acceptable83.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Partecipants With Improvement in the Quality of Life (QoL)

to evaluate improvement in the Quality of Life (QoL) of the subject related to his/her dermatitis, through the DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) questionnaire; DLQI is a questionnaire used to measure the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. There are 10 questions, covering the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, treatment. Each question refers to the impact of the skin disease on the patient's life over the previous week. Each question was scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life). Global score: 0-1 = No effect on patient's life 2-5 = Small effect 6-10 = Moderate effect 11-20 = Very large effect 21-30 = Extremely large effect.

Time frame: to 14, 28 and 42 days of treatment

Secondary

Percentage of Partecipants With Improvement of the Dermatitis Severity

to evaluate the performance of the DermoRelizema ecofoam in the improvement of dermatitis severity (IGA) after 14 and 42 days of treatment;

Time frame: after 14 and 42 days of treatment

Population: This endpoint was conducted on the FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DermoRelizema EcofoamPercentage of Partecipants With Improvement of the Dermatitis Severity35 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patient With Improvement of Performance by IGA

to evaluate the subject's and Investigator's global evaluation of performance of DermoRelizema ecofoam by means of a 7-items scale (where 1 = very much improved, 2 = improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = worse, 7 = very much worse)

Time frame: at the end of the study ( day 42)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DermoRelizema EcofoamPercentage of Patient With Improvement of Performance by IGA36 Participants
Secondary

VAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visits

to evaluate the improvement in pain and pruritus at visits, as reported by the subject at visits by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). The subject was requested to indicate at each visit his/her pruritus, itching, burning and pain by placing a vertical mark along a 100 mm VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). The rating was recorded as a distance from the left side of the scale (0 mm) to the mark made by the patient.

Time frame: to 14, 28 and 42 days of treatment

Population: Change in ichting, burning, pain and prurits by VA from baseline to every following time point was analized using paired student's t-test if the variable is normally distribuited and wilcoxon signed rank test if the variabile is not normally distribuited. The subject was requested to indicate at each visit his/her pruritus, itching, burning and pain by placing a vertical mark along a 100 mm VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). .

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitsitching at day 4216.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitsburning at baseline24.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.24
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitspruritus at day 1424.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.98
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitspruritus at day 2810.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.24
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitsitching at baseline32.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.09
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitsitching at day 1417.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.29
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitsitching at day 283.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.33
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitsburning at day 1418.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitsburning at day 288.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitsburning at day 420.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.95
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitspain at baseline4.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.29
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitspain at day 140.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.58
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitspain at day 280.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.17
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitspain at day 420.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.43
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitspruritus at baseline52.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.6
DermoRelizema EcofoamVAS Scores for Itcing, Burning, Pain and Prurits at Visitspruritus at day 421.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.38

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026