Skip to content

Monitoring Activity And Gait In Children

Low-Interventional Study to Record Gait and Physical Activity Using ActiGraph Devices in Children Ages 3-17.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04823650
Acronym
MAGIC
Enrollment
87
Registered
2021-04-01
Start date
2021-08-23
Completion date
2024-10-28
Last updated
2025-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool

Keywords

COHORT A :, Gait, Activity, Actigraphy, COHORT B:, Sleep

Brief summary

COHORT A: To study whether a digital health tool called Actigraph can be used to collect information on gait and physical activity in healthy children aged 3-17. The study will be conducted at the Pfizer Innovation Research Laboratory (PfIRe Lab) in Cambridge MA. In the lab at the first visit, we will ask participants to do activities such as walking on different surfaces as well as to roll a dice and move between different activity stations. Children will wear 2 Actigraph devices, one as a watch and one as a belt. They will then go home and do usual daily activities while answering a brief daily activity diary for approximately 2 weeks. The conclusion of the study will be over the telephone and include questions on the comfort and wearability of the device. The analysis of gait and physical activity as well as adherence and wearability will be looked across three different age groups 3-5, 6-11, and 12-17. COHORT B: Cohort B of the study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the Panoramic Bracelet and associated algorithms such as SleepPy and GaitPy compared to the GENEActiv device and to evaluate the comfort and wearability of the Panoramic Bracelet. The results of this study will enable the use of novel devices in future clinical trials measuring scratch and sleep. . In the lab at the first visit, we will ask participants to do activities such as walking on different surfaces as well as to roll a dice and move between different activity stations. They will then go home and do usual daily activities while wearing both devices in the same wrist at different times stipulated in the protocol, answering a brief daily activity and sleep diary for approximately 2 weeks. Cohort B includes questions on the comfort and wearability of the Panoramic device on Day 7 approximately. The conclusion of the study will be over the telephone.The analysis will be looked across three different age groups 3-5, 6-11, and 12-17

Interventions

DEVICECOHORT A: Actigraph

The ActiGraph CentrePoint Insight Watch is a small worn activity monitor designed for documenting physical movement associated with applications in physiological monitoring.

DEVICEPanoramic Bracelet and GENEActiv

Panoramic Bracelet: The Panoramic Digital Health Bracelet is a wearable inertial measurement unit intended for use by researchers and healthcare professionals for high frequency or continuous collection of physical data in home and professional healthcare settings during research studies. It includes a 3 axis accelerometer and gyroscope, as well as magnetometer, pressure, and temperature sensors. The bracelet has no interface or screen for participants to interact with. GENEActiv: The GENEActiv device is a wearable inertial measurement unit designed for public health research and clinical trials. The device is a circular unit with attachable wrist-bands, and has no interface or screen for participants to interact with. The GENEActiv device is FDA 510(k) exempt. The device records acceleration data and can collect data remotely for up to 1 month.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ambulatory * No significant health problems that would impair the completion of the physical activity tasks, does not carry any diagnosis of developmental delay and/or significant co-morbid medical conditions as determined by a medically qualified individual during medical history review

Exclusion criteria

* Participation in other studies involving digital devices within 1 week and/or treatment with an investigational drug (Phases 1-4) within 30 days or 5 half-lives before the current study begins and/or during study participation. * Participants with implanted medical devices. * Minor participants who reach the age of majority during the study, as recognized under local law. * Any medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study. * Participants with known allergies to components as specified by device manufacturer if applicable (eg, plastic, stainless steel and silicone).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohort A: Number of Days to Complete EnrollmentUp to approximately 8 monthsNumber of days to complete enrollment corresponded to the total number of days it took to enroll all study participants within the age groups of 3-5 years, 6-11 years and 12-17 years.
Cohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes of Day 1Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit on Day 1 during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Swing duration was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-lab simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivNumber of wake bouts for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.
Cohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivTotal sleep time for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's total sleep opportunity (TSO) window and computing sleep metrics within that window.
Cohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivThe percentage of time asleep for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.
Cohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivSleep onset latency which is time to transition from full wakefulness to sleep, for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.
Cohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivWake after sleep onset is time for which participants were awake after having initially fallen asleep, for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.
Cohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivTotal scratch duration for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.
Cohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivTotal scratch episodes for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.
Cohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivAvailable minutes represented any recorded accelerometer data per day per device in minutes. Number of available minutes for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built Sci-kit Digital Health (SKDH) package.
Cohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivNumber of minutes of wear include the total number of minutes the device is worn including sleep time and awake time. The wear time parameter (number of minutes of wear) for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built SKDH package.
Cohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home PeriodFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActivThe wear time parameter (number of wear minutes while awake) for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built SKDH package.
Cohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Day 7Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicated more comfort, except for questions 5 (The device changes the way I move) and 6 (The device changes the way I behave) , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.
Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).
Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometery data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Number of participants who were able to perform each of the 7 tasks (i.e., walking at natural, slow and fast speeds, tile and carpet walks, 2 sessions of in-lab simulated activities) is reported in this outcome measure.
Cohort A: Percentage of Tasks Completed (From a Total of 7 Tasks)Up to 20 minutes on Day 1Percentage of tasks completed from a total of 7 tasks (i.e., walking at natural, slow and fast speeds, tile and carpet walks, 2 sessions of in-lab simulated activities) is reported in this outcome measure.
Cohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist DevicesFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)
Cohort A: Number of Days With More Than 10 Hours of Wear Time for Lumbar DeviceFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)
Cohort A: Number of Days With More Than 18 Hours of Wear Time for Wrist DeviceFrom Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)
Cohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1Day 1Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicate more comfort except for questions 5 (The device changes the way I move) and 6 (The device changes the way I behave) , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.
Cohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationDay 15 (+ 3 days)Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicate more comfort except for questions 5 (The device changes the way I move) and 6 (The device changes the way I behave) , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.
Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.
Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Single limb support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.
Cohort A: Stance Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.
Cohort A: Swing Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.
Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.
Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.
Cohort A: Cadence Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.
Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.
Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.
Cohort B: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Panoramic Bracelet Devices at HomeFrom Day 1 up to Day 7
Cohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.
Cohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.
Cohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.
Cohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.
Cohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.
Cohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.
Cohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.
Cohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.
Cohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksUp to 20 minutes on Day 1Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.
Cohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over TimeUp to approximately 8 monthsNumber of participants enrolled at specified month intervals in the study is reported in this outcome measure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

In this observational study, healthy pediatric participants (aged 3-17) were enrolled in 2 cohorts: Cohort A and B. A total of 87 participants (Cohort A: 40 and Cohort B: 47) were screened and enrolled in the study. No intervention was administered during this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 Years
Participants aged 3 to 5 years wore the ActiGraph CenterPoint Insight Watch on the non-dominant wrist (worn continuously) and lumbar region (worn after waking up in the morning and removed while sleeping at night or nap during daytime) for approximately 15 days (+ 3 days). Participants wore the Ambulatory Parkinson's Disease Monitoring System (APDM) Opal sensors on each wrist, chest, lumbar, and above each shoe, only on Day 1.
13
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 Years
Participants aged 6 to 11 years wore the ActiGraph CenterPoint Insight Watch on the non-dominant wrist (worn continuously) and lumbar region (worn after waking up in the morning and removed while sleeping at night or nap during daytime) for approximately 15 days (+ 3 days). Participants wore the APDM Opal sensors on each wrist, chest, lumbar, and above each shoe, only on Day 1.
14
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 Years
Participants aged 12 to 17 years wore the ActiGraph CenterPoint Insight Watch on the non-dominant wrist (worn continuously) and lumbar region (worn after waking up in the morning and removed while sleeping at night or nap during daytime) for approximately 15 days (+ 3 days). Participants wore the APDM Opal sensors on each wrist, chest, lumbar, and above each shoe, only on Day 1.
13
Cohort B: Participants Aged 3-5 Years
Participants aged 3 to 5 years wore the Panoramic Digital Health Bracelet on the non-dominant wrist for approximately 15 days (+ 3 days). GENEActiv device was also worn on the same non-dominant wrist from Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days). Participants wore the APDM Opal sensors on each wrist, chest, lumbar, and above each shoe, only on Day 1.
13
Cohort B: Participants Aged 6-11 Years
Participants aged 6 to 11 years wore the Panoramic Digital Health Bracelet on the non-dominant wrist for approximately 15 days (+ 3 days). GENEActiv device was also worn on the same non-dominant wrist from Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days). Participants wore the APDM Opal sensors on each wrist, chest, lumbar, and above each shoe, only on Day 1.
17
Cohort B: Participants Aged 12-17 Years
Participants aged 12 to 17 years wore the Panoramic Digital Health Bracelet on the non-dominant wrist for approximately 15 days (+ 3 days). GENEActiv device was also worn on the same non-dominant wrist from Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days). Participants wore the APDM Opal sensors on each wrist, chest, lumbar, and above each shoe, only on Day 1.
17
Total87

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject000010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsTotalCohort B: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Participants Aged 12-17 Years
Age, Continuous
Cohort A
4.38 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.65
9.00 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
14.77 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59
9.38 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.48
Age, Continuous
Cohort B
9.23 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.26
4.00 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.82
8.53 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62
13.94 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants9 Participants0 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants11 Participants11 Participants76 Participants13 Participants13 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants3 Participants5 Participants15 Participants1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants7 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants10 Participants8 Participants62 Participants8 Participants12 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants6 Participants9 Participants49 Participants8 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants8 Participants4 Participants38 Participants5 Participants9 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 140 / 130 / 130 / 170 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 133 / 143 / 132 / 134 / 173 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 140 / 130 / 130 / 170 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Cohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 1126.97 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.487
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 1128.71 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 5.515
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 2130.96 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.346
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 2129.90 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 6.846
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 2122.49 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 9.919
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 1118.54 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 11.395
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 2120.51 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 8.758
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 1122.32 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 11.001
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 2109.63 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 6.715
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 1108.15 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 6.842
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 2110.84 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.109
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 1109.47 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.972
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.81]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.37, 0.94]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.73, 0.99]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.06, 0.85]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.45, 0.93]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.63, 0.99]
Primary

Cohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed139.59 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 17.74
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed94.57 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 17.679
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed139.50 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 10.993
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed147.26 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 19.313
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed123.07 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 17.515
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed91.77 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 16.656
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed124.09 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 20.093
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed120.57 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 17.555
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed98.12 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 14.187
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed130.42 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 16.612
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed118.17 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 13.763
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed117.97 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 14.652
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed120.04 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 13.073
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed134.16 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 17.301
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed137.06 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 17.574
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed81.48 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 16.704
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed76.61 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 17.346
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed78.38 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 18.1
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed107.97 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.556
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed106.00 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.971
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed82.59 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 11.866
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed104.23 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 9.496
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed82.55 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 12.486
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed113.16 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 9.725
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed118.24 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 8.667
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed81.53 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 11.926
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed122.30 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 9.326
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.74, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.92, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.66, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.92, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.8, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.19, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.89, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.91, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.5, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.64, 0.42]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.64, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0, 0.85]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.49, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.68, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.11, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.17, 0.53]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.65, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.04, 0.87]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.09, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.34, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.92, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.63, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.76, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.96, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.61, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.79, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.96, 1]
Primary

Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.22 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.25 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.013
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.21 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.034
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.24 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.012
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.27 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.02
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.21 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.061
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.19 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.19
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.26 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.022
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.023
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.022
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.21 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.039
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.22 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.046
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.2, 0.4]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.22, 0.5]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.64]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.18, 0.39]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.3]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.57]
Primary

Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.23 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.02
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.15
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.16 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.18 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.048
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.26 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.45 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.155
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.22 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.081
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.28 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.096
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.29 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.024
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.20 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.057
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.27 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.26 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.053
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.17 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.033
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.24 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.028
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.13 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.32 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.039
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.60 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.192
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.41 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.144
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.21 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.048
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.022
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.32 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.034
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.31 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.049
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.38 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.126
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.24 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.042
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.27 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.02
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.53 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.139
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.14 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.039
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.02, 0.84]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.35, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.14, 0.87]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.11, 0.82]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.01, 0.52]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.59]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.17, 0.88]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.71]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.7]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.18, 0.66]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.21, 0.83]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.19, 0.72]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.46]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.01, 0.44]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.02, 0.35]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.08, 0.59]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.7]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.03, 0.53]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.25, 0.34]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.13, 0.27]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.21, 0.21]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.5, 0.44]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.31, 0.5]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.62, 0.29]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.02, 0.69]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.08, 0.59]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.52]
Primary

Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.72 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.111
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.91 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.084
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.73 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.158
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.92 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.097
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 21.03 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.09
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.80 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.21
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.85 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.161
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.98 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.085
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.96 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.13
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.95 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.104
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.98 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.106
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.97 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.109
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.16, 0.26]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.21, 0.49]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.14, 0.8]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.22, 0.35]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.35, 0.26]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.32, 0.71]
Primary

Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed1.03 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.231
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.49 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.159
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed1.00 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.218
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed1.32 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.268
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.83 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.192
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.57 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.164
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.81 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.213
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.93 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.234
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.56 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.15
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed1.49 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.252
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed1.00 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.142
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed1.13 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.127
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed1.02 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.119
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed1.22 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.129
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed1.36 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.247
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.58 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.173
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.54 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.151
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.45 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.153
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed1.10 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.171
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed1.04 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.174
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.64 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.173
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed1.21 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.177
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.66 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.196
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed1.56 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.161
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed1.30 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.115
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.75 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.204
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed1.43 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.139
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.16, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.1, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.05, 0.92]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.33, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.65, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.16, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.36, 0.93]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.08, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.17, 0.84]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.15, 0.89]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.16, 0.77]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.07, 0.74]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.58, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.13, 0.85]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.1, 0.87]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.1, 0.88]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.85]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.54, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.27, 0.72]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.19, 0.79]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.18, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.09, 0.92]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.19, 0.69]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.81, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.42, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.09, 0.98]
Primary

Cohort A: Number of Days to Complete Enrollment

Number of days to complete enrollment corresponded to the total number of days it took to enroll all study participants within the age groups of 3-5 years, 6-11 years and 12-17 years.

Time frame: Up to approximately 8 months

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Days to Complete Enrollment232 Days
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Days to Complete Enrollment101 Days
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Days to Complete Enrollment77 Days
Primary

Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.024
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.017
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.015
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.02
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.032
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.41 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.038
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.41 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.028
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.024
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.022
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.44 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.017
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.45 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.021
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.16, 0.51]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.86]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.03, 0.74]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.15, 0.73]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.8]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.03, 0.73]
Primary

Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometery data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.31 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.036
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.48 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.062
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.054
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.43 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.058
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.045
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.034
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.47 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.08
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.039
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.38 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.05
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.037
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.042
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.042
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.042
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.59 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.14
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.51 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.074
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.59 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.112
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.46 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.022
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.028
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.58 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.123
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.055
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.38 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.026
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.48 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.045
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.024
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.45, 0.93]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.66, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.17, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.13, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.93]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.82]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.02, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.93]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.83]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.48, 0.56]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.82, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.58, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.14, 0.83]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.03, 0.74]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.56]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.93]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.83]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.18, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.21, 0.89]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.21, 0.79]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.71, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.62, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.26, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.02, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.83]
Primary

Cohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.59 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.044
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.60 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.022
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.57 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.042
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.60 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.63 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.051
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.62 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.072
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.60 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.053
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.63 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.055
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.71 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.041
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.72 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.046
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.65 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.053
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.66 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.06
Comparison: Activity Block 1: Actigraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.31, 0.69]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: Actigraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.3, 0.89]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: Actigraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.09, 0.92]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: Actigraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.18, 0.69]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: Actigraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.82]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: Actigraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.9]
Primary

Cohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.56 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.063
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.84 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.205
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.52 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.05
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.07
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.63 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.085
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.88 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.207
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.60 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.119
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.64 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.129
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.75 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.081
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.087
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.65 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.072
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.64 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.082
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.59 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.07
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.58 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.075
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.075
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.91 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.127
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.11 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.265
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed1.00 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.227
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.66 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.065
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.72 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.054
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.83 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.166
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.72 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.062
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.94 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.181
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.62 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.057
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.65 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.046
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.02 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.178
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.56 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.056
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.19, 0.72]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.46]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.01, 0.44]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.71, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.9, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.88, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.58, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.02, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.92]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.36, 0.93]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.08, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.04, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.18, 0.66]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.21, 0.83]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.02, 0.35]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.08, 0.59]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.7]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.03, 0.53]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.15, 0.75]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.21, 0.81]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.23, 0.5]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.12, 0.76]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.04, 0.89]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.34, 0.59]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.25, 0.87]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.01, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0, 0.69]
Primary

Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-lab simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.46 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.022
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.47 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.019
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.45 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.021
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.46 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.024
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.04
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.048
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.038
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.045
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.034
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.56 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.036
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.54 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.035
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.039
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.08, 0.86]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.72, 0.97]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.15, 0.99]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.1, 0.87]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.67, 0.96]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.99]
Primary

Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit on Day 1 during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.44 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.061
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.66 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.137
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.43 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.035
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.048
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.072
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.65 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.128
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.081
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.08
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.62 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.088
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.44 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.058
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.51 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.061
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.51 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.058
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.055
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.45 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.059
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.44 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.058
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.76 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.142
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.80 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.163
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.80 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.165
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.56 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.041
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.57 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.046
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.74 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.109
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.56 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.043
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.74 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.116
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.037
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.51 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.037
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.75 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.116
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.038
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.94, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.72, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.01, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.95, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.75, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.16, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.96, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.91, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.47, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.39, 0.45]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.07, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.21, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.42, 0.93]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.48, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.2, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.58]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.8, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.12, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.58, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.52, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.94, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.42, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.53, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.94, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.73, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.77, 0.98]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.97, 1]
Primary

Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.95 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.06
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.94 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.047
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.92 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.05
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.93 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.055
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.079
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 11.02 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.099
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 21.00 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.076
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.088
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 21.09 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.067
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 11.10 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.069
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 21.09 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.07
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 11.10 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.081
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.28, 0.73]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.23, 0.95]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.91, 0.99]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.16, 0.88]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.55, 0.94]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [0.93, 0.99]
Primary

Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.88 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.132
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed1.31 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.265
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.87 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.07
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.78 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.093
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.15
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.258
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.163
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.162
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed1.22 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.155
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.89 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.123
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed1.02 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.118
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed1.01 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.118
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed1.01 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.111
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.91 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.115
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.89 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.113
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed1.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.21
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.61 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.327
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed1.60 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.331
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed1.12 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.084
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed1.13 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.082
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed1.41 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.149
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed1.12 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.091
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed1.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.233
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.079
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed1.01 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.073
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.226
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.076
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.95, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.09, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.96, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.95, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.9, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.28, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.96, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.97, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.94, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.44, 0.39]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.53, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.06, 1]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.3, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.44, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.12, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.11, 0.52]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.84, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.99]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.26, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.07, 0.8]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.15, 0.88]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.18, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.81]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.16, 0.88]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.57, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.3, 0.89]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.53, 0.93]
Primary

Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.73 MeterStandard Deviation 0.09
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.86 MeterStandard Deviation 0.087
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.71 MeterStandard Deviation 0.134
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.86 MeterStandard Deviation 0.094
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 21.02 MeterStandard Deviation 0.096
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.89 MeterStandard Deviation 0.185
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.93 MeterStandard Deviation 0.165
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.99 MeterStandard Deviation 0.097
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 21.05 MeterStandard Deviation 0.132
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 11.05 MeterStandard Deviation 0.11
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 21.14 MeterStandard Deviation 0.084
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 11.12 MeterStandard Deviation 0.089
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.24, 0.31]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.19, 0.68]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.17, 0.72]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.22, 0.44]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.18, 0.68]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.18, 0.7]
Primary

Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes of Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed0.88 MetersStandard Deviation 0.141
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.61 MetersStandard Deviation 0.118
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.85 MetersStandard Deviation 0.144
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed1.02 MetersStandard Deviation 0.13
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed0.80 MetersStandard Deviation 0.112
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.71 MetersStandard Deviation 0.116
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.78 MetersStandard Deviation 0.126
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.89 MetersStandard Deviation 0.113
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.67 MetersStandard Deviation 0.122
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed1.32 MetersStandard Deviation 0.195
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed1.01 MetersStandard Deviation 0.139
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed1.13 MetersStandard Deviation 0.127
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed1.02 MetersStandard Deviation 0.114
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed1.12 MetersStandard Deviation 0.155
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed1.20 MetersStandard Deviation 0.196
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.75 MetersStandard Deviation 0.104
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.82 MetersStandard Deviation 0.136
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.68 MetersStandard Deviation 0.129
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed1.22 MetersStandard Deviation 0.118
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Natural Speed1.16 MetersStandard Deviation 0.146
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Slow Speed0.90 MetersStandard Deviation 0.142
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed1.35 MetersStandard Deviation 0.116
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.94 MetersStandard Deviation 0.155
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed1.54 MetersStandard Deviation 0.104
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksActiGraph: Fast Speed1.31 MetersStandard Deviation 0.109
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.08 MetersStandard Deviation 0.155
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed1.40 MetersStandard Deviation 0.11
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.19, 0.87]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.11, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.06, 0.85]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.35, 0.7]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.66, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.02, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.08, 0.78]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.08, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.15, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.15, 0.87]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.04, 0.68]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.31, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.2, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.19, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.1, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.1, 0.92]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.04, 0.81]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.26, 0.92]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.05, 0.87]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.18, 0.83]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.06, 0.89]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.86]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.38, 0.92]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.01, 0.91]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.08, 0.89]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.11, 0.9]
Primary

Cohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

Swing duration was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.33 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.017
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.35 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.021
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.33 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.019
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.02
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.036
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.034
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.03
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 10.44 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.024
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 20.43 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.019
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 20.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.02
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 10.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.022
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.16, 0.52]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.88]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.8]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.21, 0.84]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.02, 0.85]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.75]
Primary

Cohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by Actigraph for Walk at Fast Speed0.31 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.03
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by APDM for Walk at Slow Speed0.47 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.063
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by APDM for Walk at Fast Speed0.35 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.025
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by GAITRite for Walk at Fast Speed0.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by Actigraph for Walk at Natural Speed0.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.054
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by GAITRite for Walk at Slow Speed0.43 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.058
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by APDM for Walk at Natural Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.047
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by GAITRite for Walk at Natural Speed0.35 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.034
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by Actigraph for Walk at Slow Speed0.45 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.067
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by GAITRite for Walk at Fast Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.039
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by Actigraph for Walk at Natural Speed0.38 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.05
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by GAITRite for Walk at Natural Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.037
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by APDM for Walk at Natural Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.041
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by Actigraph for Walk at Fast Speed0.33 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.043
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by APDM for Walk at Fast Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.042
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by Actigraph for Walk at Slow Speed0.53 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.096
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by GAITRite for Walk at Slow Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.074
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by APDM for Walk at Slow Speed0.60 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.116
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by APDM for Walk at Natural Speed0.45 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.021
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by Actigraph for Walk at Natural Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.028
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by Actigraph for Walk at Slow Speed0.56 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.106
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by GAITRite for Walk at Natural Speed0.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by APDM for Walk at Slow Speed0.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.056
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by GAITRite for Walk at Fast Speed0.38 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.028
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by Actigraph for Walk at Fast Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by GAITRite for Walk at Slow Speed0.48 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.045
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksSwing Duration Measured by APDM for Walk at Fast Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.025
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.53, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.66, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.17, 0.94]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.14, 0.97]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.92]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.81]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.02, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.93]
Comparison: Walk at Natural Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.83]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.32, 0.69]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.69, 0.96]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.47, 0.95]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.13, 0.8]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.88]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [-0.03, 0.71]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.08, 0.66]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.05, 0.92]
Comparison: Walk at Fast Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.03, 0.81]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.11, 0.86]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [0.29, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite95% CI: [-0.2, 0.78]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.23, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0, 0.84]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs APDM95% CI: [0.03, 0.84]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.2, 0.9]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [0.04, 0.87]
Comparison: Walk at Slow Speed: ActiGraph vs GAITRite vs APDM95% CI: [-0.02, 0.79]
Primary

Cohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated Activities

Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 1109.23 StepsStandard Deviation 42.54
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 1103.00 StepsStandard Deviation 72.623
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Wrist: Activity Block 1187.38 StepsStandard Deviation 67.463
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 2120.77 StepsStandard Deviation 57.727
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 2125.46 StepsStandard Deviation 71.906
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Wrist: Activity Block 2210.92 StepsStandard Deviation 109.188
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Wrist: Activity Block 2275.14 StepsStandard Deviation 87.96
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 1123.00 StepsStandard Deviation 51.067
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 2130.57 StepsStandard Deviation 56.896
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 2172.79 StepsStandard Deviation 72.707
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 1163.43 StepsStandard Deviation 75.572
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Wrist: Activity Block 1242.86 StepsStandard Deviation 73.539
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 1114.46 StepsStandard Deviation 87.498
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Wrist: Activity Block 1211.15 StepsStandard Deviation 80.045
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Wrist: Activity Block 2225.69 StepsStandard Deviation 98.155
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 2154.15 StepsStandard Deviation 47.43
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesAPDM: Activity Block 1154.62 StepsStandard Deviation 49.399
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated ActivitiesActiGraph Lumbar: Activity Block 2109.15 StepsStandard Deviation 72.281
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Wrist vs APDM95% CI: [-0.16, 0.53]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Wrist vs APDM95% CI: [-0.114, 0.64]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Wrist vs APDM95% CI: [-0.17, 0.73]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.23, 0.76]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.12, 0.74]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.15, 0.74]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar95% CI: [-0.18, 0.65]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar95% CI: [-0.17, 0.87]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar95% CI: [-0.2, 0.75]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.06, 0.59]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.1, 0.74]
Comparison: Activity Block 1: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.03, 0.7]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Wrist vs APDM95% CI: [-0.2, 0.77]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Wrist vs APDM95% CI: [-0.12, 0.56]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Wrist vs APDM95% CI: [-0.18, 0.71]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.14, 0.8]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.22, 0.65]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.14, 0.77]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar95% CI: [-0.22, 0.86]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar95% CI: [-0.18, 0.72]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar95% CI: [-0.17, 0.74]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.02, 0.78]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Wrist vs Actigraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.08, 0.59]
Comparison: Activity Block 2: ActiGraph Wrist vs ActiGraph Lumbar vs APDM95% CI: [-0.07, 0.7]
Primary

Cohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home Period

Available minutes represented any recorded accelerometer data per day per device in minutes. Number of available minutes for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built Sci-kit Digital Health (SKDH) package.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet1389.08 MinutesStandard Deviation 28.718
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv1234.49 MinutesStandard Deviation 173.436
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet1386.44 MinutesStandard Deviation 50.327
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv1260.18 MinutesStandard Deviation 129.136
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet1385.76 MinutesStandard Deviation 28.941
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv1310.20 MinutesStandard Deviation 86.365
Primary

Cohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home Period

Number of minutes of wear include the total number of minutes the device is worn including sleep time and awake time. The wear time parameter (number of minutes of wear) for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built SKDH package.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet1095.45 MinutesStandard Deviation 145.296
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv727.98 MinutesStandard Deviation 226.617
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet1099.07 MinutesStandard Deviation 185.868
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv785.81 MinutesStandard Deviation 195.558
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet1044.66 MinutesStandard Deviation 153.988
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv789.37 MinutesStandard Deviation 181.889
Primary

Cohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7

Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicated more comfort, except for questions 5 (The device changes the way I move) and 6 (The device changes the way I behave) , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.

Time frame: Day 7

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On39 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear43 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days39 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move412 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results39 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On23 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off23 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear311 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Move414 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Comfortable to Wear45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I would want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Changes the Way I Behave413 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7If the device could follow my progress during a treatment (ttmt), I would wear it36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days39 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Put On22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Primary

Cohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home Period

Number of wake bouts for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed ' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv9.69 Wake boutsStandard Deviation 2.579
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet8.74 Wake boutsStandard Deviation 2.895
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet9.59 Wake boutsStandard Deviation 4.436
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv9.57 Wake boutsStandard Deviation 4.979
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet9.40 Wake boutsStandard Deviation 4.171
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv9.37 Wake boutsStandard Deviation 4.651
Primary

Cohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home Period

The wear time parameter (number of wear minutes while awake) for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built SKDH package.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet813.15 MinutesStandard Deviation 47.851
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv706.48 MinutesStandard Deviation 85.259
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet883.23 MinutesStandard Deviation 73.627
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv768.64 MinutesStandard Deviation 99.152
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet845.01 MinutesStandard Deviation 85.179
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv775.16 MinutesStandard Deviation 152.259
Primary

Cohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home Period

The percentage of time asleep for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed ' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet95.65 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 1.745
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv94.85 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.258
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet94.93 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.049
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv94.94 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.402
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet94.85 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.481
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv94.08 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 2.762
Primary

Cohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home Period

Sleep onset latency which is time to transition from full wakefulness to sleep, for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed ' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet2.64 MinutesStandard Deviation 0.868
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv3.69 MinutesStandard Deviation 1.966
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet3.82 MinutesStandard Deviation 1.118
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv4.01 MinutesStandard Deviation 1.425
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet2.39 MinutesStandard Deviation 1.428
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv3.64 MinutesStandard Deviation 2.291
Primary

Cohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home Period

Total scratch duration for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed ' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet2.45 MinutesStandard Deviation 0.785
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv3.17 MinutesStandard Deviation 1.138
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet3.29 MinutesStandard Deviation 1.453
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv3.19 MinutesStandard Deviation 1.456
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet3.35 MinutesStandard Deviation 1.576
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv3.75 MinutesStandard Deviation 2.032
Primary

Cohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home Period

Total scratch episodes for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed ' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet34.74 Scratch episodesStandard Deviation 9.585
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv43.81 Scratch episodesStandard Deviation 14.447
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet45.60 Scratch episodesStandard Deviation 17.613
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv43.45 Scratch episodesStandard Deviation 16.683
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet46.04 Scratch episodesStandard Deviation 19.338
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv49.74 Scratch episodesStandard Deviation 25.354
Primary

Cohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home Period

Total sleep time for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's total sleep opportunity (TSO) window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed ' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet561.21 MinutesStandard Deviation 43.476
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv567.48 MinutesStandard Deviation 40.483
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet520.34 MinutesStandard Deviation 26.68
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv524.57 MinutesStandard Deviation 42.583
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet459.92 MinutesStandard Deviation 44.421
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv450.53 MinutesStandard Deviation 54.944
Primary

Cohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home Period

Wake after sleep onset is time for which participants were awake after having initially fallen asleep, for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed ' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet22.38 MinutesStandard Deviation 9.022
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv26.44 MinutesStandard Deviation 13.112
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet24.36 MinutesStandard Deviation 12.82
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv23.58 MinutesStandard Deviation 15.339
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home PeriodPanoramic Bracelet21.62 MinutesStandard Deviation 12.976
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home PeriodGENEActiv22.01 MinutesStandard Deviation 12.396
Secondary

Cohort A: Cadence Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A. Mixed model regression analysis did not use age group as a grouping variable and was performed across all participants independent of age groups; hence, combined data is reported for participants aged 3 to 17 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Carpet115.08 Steps per minuteStandard Error 2.236
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Carpet116.79 Steps per minuteStandard Error 2.24
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Tile117.56 Steps per minuteStandard Error 2.236
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Cadence Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Tile119.62 Steps per minuteStandard Error 2.236
Secondary

Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A. Mixed model regression analysis did not use age group as a grouping variable and was performed across all participants independent of age groups; hence, combined data is reported for participants aged 3 to 17 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Carpet0.28 SecondsStandard Error 0.007
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Carpet0.20 SecondsStandard Error 0.007
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Tile0.28 SecondsStandard Error 0.007
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Tile0.19 SecondsStandard Error 0.007
Secondary

Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A. Mixed model regression analysis did not use age group as a grouping variable and was performed across all participants independent of age groups; hence, combined data is reported for participants aged 3 to 17 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Carpet0.95 Meters per secondStandard Error 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Carpet0.97 Meters per secondStandard Error 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Tile0.97 Meters per secondStandard Error 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Gait Speed Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Tile1.00 Meters per secondStandard Error 0.027
Secondary

Cohort A: Number of Days With More Than 10 Hours of Wear Time for Lumbar Device

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Days With More Than 10 Hours of Wear Time for Lumbar Device6.15 DaysStandard Deviation 4.413
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Days With More Than 10 Hours of Wear Time for Lumbar Device11.71 DaysStandard Deviation 3.561
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Days With More Than 10 Hours of Wear Time for Lumbar Device11.69 DaysStandard Deviation 2.25
Secondary

Cohort A: Number of Days With More Than 18 Hours of Wear Time for Wrist Device

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Days With More Than 18 Hours of Wear Time for Wrist Device12.38 DaysStandard Deviation 2.534
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Days With More Than 18 Hours of Wear Time for Wrist Device13.21 DaysStandard Deviation 1.718
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Days With More Than 18 Hours of Wear Time for Wrist Device12.54 DaysStandard Deviation 2.436
Secondary

Cohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist Devices

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist DevicesWrist device21.05 Hours per dayStandard Deviation 2.461
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist DevicesLumbar device7.24 Hours per dayStandard Deviation 4.293
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist DevicesWrist device21.80 Hours per dayStandard Deviation 1.947
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist DevicesLumbar device12.51 Hours per dayStandard Deviation 3.63
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist DevicesWrist device22.01 Hours per dayStandard Deviation 2.169
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist DevicesLumbar device14.24 Hours per dayStandard Deviation 4.574
Secondary

Cohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based Tasks

Number of participants who were able to perform each of the 7 tasks (i.e., walking at natural, slow and fast speeds, tile and carpet walks, 2 sessions of in-lab simulated activities) is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksFast Walk13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksTile Walk13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksCarpet Walk13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksNatural Walk13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksActivity Block 213 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksActivity Block 113 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksSlow Walk13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksCarpet Walk14 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksNatural Walk14 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksFast Walk14 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksSlow Walk14 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksTile Walk14 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksActivity Block 114 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksActivity Block 214 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksTile Walk13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksFast Walk13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksActivity Block 213 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksActivity Block 113 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksCarpet Walk13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksSlow Walk13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based TasksNatural Walk13 Participants
Secondary

Cohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study Evaluation

Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicate more comfort except for questions 5 (The device changes the way I move) and 6 (The device changes the way I behave) , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.

Time frame: Day 15 (+ 3 days)

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days43 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear43 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days02 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days12 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear01 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days43 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear43 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear12 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days01 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days12 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move12 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move412 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear24 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Move411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Changes the Way I Behave410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear24 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear12 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Put On47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Take Off49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Final Study EvaluationACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days35 Participants
Secondary

Cohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1

Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicate more comfort except for questions 5 (The device changes the way I move) and 6 (The device changes the way I behave) , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave12 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off01 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days01 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days12 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days23 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear01 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it12 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On01 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear01 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On01 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear39 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On24 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave31 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave413 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days23 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move32 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move412 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave31 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave413 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it411 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off42 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear41 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Wrist (W): Comfortable to Wear43 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Put On45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days42 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days23 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off13 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Take Off47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days43 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days39 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days49 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Easy to Wear46 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On41 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move01 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear25 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Move47 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move43 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On25 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Behave48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move24 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear44 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Wear00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off45 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Changes the Way I Move00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days22 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Changes the Way I Behave410 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days33 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear43 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Willing to Wear for > 7 Days48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Take Off00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On42 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On37 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear39 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On24 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: If the device could follow my progress during a ttmt, I would wear it34 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it35 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: If the device could follow my progress during a treatment, I would wear it48 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear21 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear41 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Put On00 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear38 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Easy to Wear10 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results20 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear23 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1APDM: Comfortable to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT L:If device could follow my progress during ttmt, I want my doctor to have access to my results36 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ActiGraph (ACT) Lumbar (L): Comfortable to Wear11 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants According to Response to In Lab Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for APDM Device and for ActiGraph Lumbar and Wrist Device at Day 1ACT W: Willing to Wear for 4 to 7 Days34 Participants
Secondary

Cohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time

Number of participants enrolled at specified month intervals in the study is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Up to approximately 8 months

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Oct-2021 to 22-Nov-20211 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Aug-2021 to 22-Sep-20215 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Sep-2021 to 22-Oct-20212 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Nov-2021 to 22-Dec-20210 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Dec-2021 to 22-Jan-20221 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Jan-2022 to 22-Feb-20220 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Feb-2022 to 22-Mar-20221 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Mar-2022 to 22-Apr-20223 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Oct-2021 to 22-Nov-20213 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Feb-2022 to 22-Mar-20220 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Nov-2021 to 22-Dec-20212 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Dec-2021 to 22-Jan-20220 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Jan-2022 to 22-Feb-20220 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Aug-2021 to 22-Sep-20213 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Mar-2022 to 22-Apr-20220 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Sep-2021 to 22-Oct-20216 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Sep-2021 to 22-Oct-20215 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Jan-2022 to 22-Feb-20220 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Oct-2021 to 22-Nov-20213 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Nov-2021 to 22-Dec-20210 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Feb-2022 to 22-Mar-20220 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Aug-2021 to 22-Sep-20215 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Dec-2021 to 22-Jan-20220 Participants
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time23-Mar-2022 to 22-Apr-20220 Participants
Secondary

Cohort A: Percentage of Tasks Completed (From a Total of 7 Tasks)

Percentage of tasks completed from a total of 7 tasks (i.e., walking at natural, slow and fast speeds, tile and carpet walks, 2 sessions of in-lab simulated activities) is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Percentage of Tasks Completed (From a Total of 7 Tasks)100 Percentage of tasks
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort A: Percentage of Tasks Completed (From a Total of 7 Tasks)100 Percentage of tasks
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort A: Percentage of Tasks Completed (From a Total of 7 Tasks)100 Percentage of tasks
Secondary

Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

Single limb support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A. Mixed model regression analysis did not use age group as a grouping variable and was performed across all participants independent of age groups; hence, combined data is reported for participants aged 3 to 17 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Carpet0.39 SecondsStandard Error 0.006
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Carpet0.42 SecondsStandard Error 0.006
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Tile0.38 SecondsStandard Error 0.006
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Tile0.42 SecondsStandard Error 0.006
Secondary

Cohort A: Stance Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A. Mixed model regression analysis did not use age group as a grouping variable and was performed across all participants independent of age groups; hence, combined data is reported for participants aged 3 to 17 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Carpet0.67 SecondsStandard Error 0.012
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Carpet0.62 SecondsStandard Error 0.012
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Tile0.66 SecondsStandard Error 0.012
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stance Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Tile0.61 SecondsStandard Error 0.012
Secondary

Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A. Mixed model regression analysis did not use age group as a grouping variable and was performed across all participants independent of age groups; hence, combined data is reported for participants aged 3 to 17 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Carpet0.53 SecondsStandard Error 0.009
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Carpet0.52 SecondsStandard Error 0.009
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Tile0.52 SecondsStandard Error 0.009
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Step Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Tile0.51 SecondsStandard Error 0.009
Secondary

Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A. Mixed model regression analysis did not use age group as a grouping variable and was performed across all participants independent of age groups; hence, combined data is reported for participants aged 3 to 17 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Carpet1.05 SecondsStandard Error 0.018
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Carpet1.04 SecondsStandard Error 0.018
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Tile1.04 SecondsStandard Error 0.018
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Duration Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Tile1.02 SecondsStandard Error 0.018
Secondary

Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A. Mixed model regression analysis did not use age group as a grouping variable and was performed across all participants independent of age groups; hence, combined data is reported for participants aged 3 to 17 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Carpet1.00 MetersStandard Error 0.016
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Carpet1.01 MetersStandard Error 0.017
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Tile1.00 MetersStandard Error 0.016
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Stride Length Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Tile1.01 MetersStandard Error 0.016
Secondary

Cohort A: Swing Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression Analysis

Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants were required to work on tile and carpet at their natural speed while wearing the device under study (ActiGraph) and APDM system. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices was processed by GaitPy to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors. Analysis was performed using mixed model regression analyses with device, floor type, and their interaction as fixed effects, and participant as random effect.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort A. Mixed model regression analysis did not use age group as a grouping variable and was performed across all participants independent of age groups; hence, combined data is reported for participants aged 3 to 17 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Tile0.38 SecondsStandard Error 0.006
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisActiGraph: Carpet0.39 SecondsStandard Error 0.006
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Carpet0.42 SecondsStandard Error 0.006
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort A: Swing Time Measured by ActiGraph and APDM Devices Across Different Floor Surfaces Using Mixed Model Regression AnalysisAPDM: Tile0.42 SecondsStandard Error 0.006
Secondary

Cohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed158.13 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 28.017
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed106.81 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 28.903
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed147.01 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 11.303
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed166.43 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 20.297
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed138.45 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 26.272
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed119.25 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 36.642
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed136.44 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.962
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed144.80 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 11.373
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed106.99 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 45.694
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed145.96 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 16.9
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed119.94 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 10.909
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed122.16 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 10.433
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed122.15 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 10.904
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed144.41 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 14.793
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed141.76 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 13.502
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed88.81 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 24.208
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed93.91 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 25.728
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed92.80 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 25.727
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed110.45 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.473
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed108.89 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.163
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed81.21 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 16.065
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed109.98 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 7.504
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed82.07 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 16.271
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed122.86 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 9.042
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed121.24 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 9.227
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed82.24 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 16.459
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed122.66 Steps per minuteStandard Deviation 8.589
Secondary

Cohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.24 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.056
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.179
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.13 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.032
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.15 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.04
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.29 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.063
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.181
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.16 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.20 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.038
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.166
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.18 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.041
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.32 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.25 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.041
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.17 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.039
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.26 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.047
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.12 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.183
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.47 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.243
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.199
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.19 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.041
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.035
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.51 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.121
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.31 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.032
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.122
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.24 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.03
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.03
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.52 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.148
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.15 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Secondary

Cohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Task

Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed1.50 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.345
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskAPDM: Slow Speed0.47 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.224
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskAPDM: Fast Speed1.07 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.105
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskGAITRite: Fast Speed1.41 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.234
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed1.15 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.209
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskGAITRite: Slow Speed0.59 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.256
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskAPDM: Natural Speed0.89 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.147
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskGAITRite: Natural Speed1.07 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.211
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.77 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.298
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskGAITRite: Fast Speed1.63 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.205
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed1.24 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.228
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskGAITRite: Natural Speed1.21 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.144
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskAPDM: Natural Speed1.11 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.144
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed1.57 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.191
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskAPDM: Fast Speed1.45 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.13
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.72 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.223
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskGAITRite: Slow Speed0.70 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.28
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskAPDM: Slow Speed0.61 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.273
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskAPDM: Natural Speed1.13 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.12
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed1.17 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.176
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.73 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.171
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskGAITRite: Natural Speed1.25 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.124
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskAPDM: Slow Speed0.65 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.168
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskGAITRite: Fast Speed1.59 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.225
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed1.50 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.262
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskGAITRite: Slow Speed0.76 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.174
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TaskAPDM: Fast Speed1.43 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.162
Secondary

Cohort B: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Panoramic Bracelet Devices at Home

Time frame: From Day 1 up to Day 7

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Panoramic Bracelet Devices at Home22.65 Hours per dayStandard Deviation 1.051
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Panoramic Bracelet Devices at Home22.80 Hours per dayStandard Deviation 1.317
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Panoramic Bracelet Devices at Home22.60 Hours per dayStandard Deviation 1.59
Secondary

Cohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.26 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.052
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.43 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.088
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.018
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.31 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.111
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.079
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.021
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.31 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.016
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.356
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.32 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.03
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.036
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.41 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.034
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.29 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.48 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.14
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.46 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.141
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.52 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.151
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.45 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.026
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.51 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.102
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.58 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.112
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.025
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.35 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.095
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.028
Secondary

Cohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.52 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.1
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.78 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.256
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.47 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.037
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.44 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.063
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.61 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.186
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.74 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.245
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.52 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.044
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.52 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.048
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.91 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.452
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.51 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.064
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.66 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.062
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.63 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.064
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.58 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.061
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.069
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.48 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.05
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.34
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.93 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.342
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.89 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.352
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.64 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.054
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.73 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.055
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed1.03 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.23
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.71 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.051
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.95 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.228
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.62 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.05
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.64 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.048
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.03 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.232
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.56 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.044
Secondary

Cohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.074
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.60 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.171
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.026
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.044
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.46 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.152
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.54 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.157
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.44 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.024
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.03
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.70 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.418
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.047
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.046
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.044
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.046
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.042
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.43 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.042
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.74 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.241
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.70 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.229
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.71 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.247
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.037
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.037
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.77 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.164
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.55 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.037
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.76 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.162
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.036
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.038
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.76 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.165
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.49 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.033
Secondary

Cohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed1.20 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.336
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.90 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.257
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.84 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.07
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.88 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.055
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.78 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.14
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.73 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.085
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.82 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.063
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed1.24 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.552
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.12 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.352
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.83 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.094
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed1.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.489
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed1.00 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.093
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.84 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.093
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed1.46 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.477
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.091
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.40 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.473
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.85 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.079
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.093
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.98 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.069
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed1.52 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.33
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.99 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.075
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.98 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.071
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.52 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.33
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed1.09 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.074
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed1.11 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.078
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed1.10 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.073
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed1.53 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.326
Secondary

Cohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed1.17 MetersStandard Deviation 0.32
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.51 MetersStandard Deviation 0.157
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.88 MetersStandard Deviation 0.073
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed1.02 MetersStandard Deviation 0.101
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed1.01 MetersStandard Deviation 0.182
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.61 MetersStandard Deviation 0.174
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.78 MetersStandard Deviation 0.104
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.88 MetersStandard Deviation 0.122
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.85 MetersStandard Deviation 0.211
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed1.34 MetersStandard Deviation 0.106
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed1.24 MetersStandard Deviation 0.166
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed1.20 MetersStandard Deviation 0.093
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed1.09 MetersStandard Deviation 0.091
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed1.33 MetersStandard Deviation 0.163
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed1.23 MetersStandard Deviation 0.109
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.99 MetersStandard Deviation 0.244
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.90 MetersStandard Deviation 0.217
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.78 MetersStandard Deviation 0.194
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed1.23 MetersStandard Deviation 0.093
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed1.29 MetersStandard Deviation 0.149
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed1.06 MetersStandard Deviation 0.127
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed1.37 MetersStandard Deviation 0.094
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.94 MetersStandard Deviation 0.112
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed1.56 MetersStandard Deviation 0.159
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed1.48 MetersStandard Deviation 0.197
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed1.11 MetersStandard Deviation 0.122
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed1.39 MetersStandard Deviation 0.12
Secondary

Cohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing Panoramic bracelet device and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace (Walk slow) and fast pace (Walk fast) for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by devices were processed by manufacturer's algorithm for APDM and SKDH gait algorithm for Panoramic bracelet device to generate gait metrics.

Time frame: Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

Population: FAS included all participants who had a signed and dated informed consent document, had assented to the study and were enrolled in the study. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants evaluable for the specified rows. The outcome measure was planned to be evaluated only for Cohort B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.182
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.26 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.051
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.32 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.016
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.017
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.026
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.30 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.085
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.081
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.36 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.015
Cohort A: Participants Aged 3-5 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.43 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.087
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.48 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.137
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.036
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.032
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.41 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.034
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.29 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.33 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.031
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.46 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.139
Cohort A: Participants Aged 6-11 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.52 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.14
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Fast Speed0.42 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.026
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Natural Speed0.45 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.027
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Slow Speed0.51 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.102
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Natural Speed0.39 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.026
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksAPDM: Slow Speed0.57 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.109
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Slow Speed0.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.095
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksGAITRite: Fast Speed0.37 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.026
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Fast Speed0.34 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.029
Cohort A: Participants Aged 12-17 YearsCohort B: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and Panoramic Bracelet Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed TasksPanoramic Bracelet: Natural Speed0.38 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.026

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026