Skip to content

EFFICACY and SAFETY OF BEVACIZUMAB (ZIRABEV®) IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HYPOXEMIC COVID-19

TRIAL EVALUATING EFFICACY and SAFETY OF BEVACIZUMAB (ZIRABEV®) IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HYPOXEMIC COVID-19, NESTED IN THE CORIMUNO-19 COHORT

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04822818
Acronym
BEVA
Enrollment
96
Registered
2021-03-30
Start date
2021-04-17
Completion date
2022-07-11
Last updated
2022-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronaviridae Infections, Corona Virus Infection, Nidovirales Infections, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Respiratory Tract Infections, RNA Virus Infections, SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), Virus Diseases

Keywords

COVID-19 pneumonia, severe hypoxemia, VEGF, bevacizumab

Brief summary

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are the most frequent complications of the COVID-19 pandemic. In these conditions, hypoxemia may result from : i) a pulmonary vascular dilatation resulting from an impaired hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and leading to ventilation-perfusion mismatching within the lungs and ii) thrombosis-mediated perfusion defects. Pulmonary vascular dilation might be due to a relative failure of the physiological acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, in the context of an over-activation of a regional vasodilatation cascade, as part of a dysfunctional inflammatory process. Perfusion abnormalities associated with pulmonary vascular dilation are suggestive of intrapulmonary shunting toward areas where gas exchange is impaired, ultimately leading to a worsening ventilation-perfusion mismatch, a regional hypoxia and a profound hypoxemia. Increased plasma levels of VEGF have been reported in moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia, highlighting the role of VEGF in the pathophysiology of the disease. A better prognosis has been reported in critically ill patients with lower levels of growth factors, HGF and VEGF-A at the time of ICU admission. Recent data of the study NCT 04275414 by Pang J et al have suggested that patients receiving a single-dose of bevacizumab have improved their oxygen support status in 92% of cases during a 28-day follow-up period, as compared with 62% of cases in an external cohort receiving standard care. Correcting endothelial permeability and vasodilatation with VEGF-targeted therapy could allow repair damaged vascular endothelium, have an indirect anti-inflammatory effect (limiting alveolar exudation of circulating inflammatory and procoagulant mediators) and improve oxygenation and therefore reduce the proportion of patients with severe forms requiring ICU referral and finally patient death. This clinical trial will therefore focus on the specific efficacy of bevacizumab in COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemia.

Interventions

DRUGBEVA+SOC

Bevacizumab : 7.5 mg / kg (with a maximum of 750 mg) on day 1 (D1) SOC : patients will receive the best of standard of care including corticosteroids, anticoagulant, antibiotics and tociluzimab

DRUGSOC

patients will receive the best of standard of care including corticosteroids, anticoagulant, antibiotics and tociluzimab

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients included in the CORIMUNO-19 cohort * Patients hospitalized in conventional ward or in the ICU belonging to the following groups: OMS Progression scale 6, 7, 8 AND no acute pulmonary embolism on CT-scan performed in the preceding 72 hours no pulmonary evident bacterial coinfection or superinfection evaluated by non-invasive procedures (serology, antigens, nasopharynx PCR, sputum examination, blood cultures…)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in OMS progression class 9 * Patients with

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The time to recovery for a category 0 to 5 on the WHO Progression scale28 days after randomizationDefined as the first day on which the patient meets the criteria for category 0 to 5 on the OMS Progression scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalat 7, 14, and 28 days after randomizationTime to death after randomization
Ventilator free daysat 7, 14, and 28 days after randomization
High flow free daysat 7, 14, and 28 days after randomization
Clinical status on the OMS Progression scaleat 7, 14, and 28 days after randomizationWHO progression scale: Uninfected; non viral RNA detected: 0 Asymptomatic; viral RNA detected: 1 Symptomatic; Independent: 2 Symptomatic; Assistance needed: 3 Hospitalized; No oxygen therapy: 4 Hospitalized; oxygen by mask or nasal prongs: 5 Hospitalized; oxygen by NIV or High flow: 6 Intubation and Mechanical ventilation, pO2/FIO2\>=150 OR SpO2/FIO2\>=200: 7 Mechanical ventilation, (pO2/FIO2\<150 OR SpO2/FIO2\<200) OR vasopressors (norepinephrine \>0.3 microg/kg/min): 8 Mechanical ventilation, pO2/FIO2\<150 AND vasopressors (norepinephrine \>0.3 microg/kg/min), OR Dialysis OR ECMO: 9 Dead: 10
Changes in VEGF plasma levelsat 7, and 14 days after randomization
Comparison of the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 events will be will be described in each group with their 95% CIDay 28Description : defined according to CTCAE v5.0 will be will be described in each group with their 95% CI
Proportion of Adverse EventDay 28, day 120 after randomizationwill be described in each group with their 95% CI
Time to oxygen supply weaningat 7, 14, and 28 days after randomization

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026