Skip to content

Comparison of Interscalene Block and Suprascapular With Axillary Block

Comparison of Analgesic Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Interscalene Block Versus Suprascapular With Axillary Block in Shoulder Arthroplasties

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04822610
Enrollment
76
Registered
2021-03-30
Start date
2021-06-30
Completion date
2022-01-31
Last updated
2022-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Arthroplasty, Ultrasound Guided

Keywords

axillary block, suprascapular block

Brief summary

In this study, the investigators are going to compare the analgesia effectiveness of interscalane block and suprascapular with axillary block in shoulder arthroplasties

Detailed description

In the preoperative period, the participants will be taken to the block room. The participants will be monitored, standard sedation will be applied. The first group will be get interscalene block. The second group will be get suprascapular and axillary block. The third group patient will be get no block. Afterwards, the participants will be operated under general anesthesia. A patient-controlled analgesia device will be attached to each group of participants and their postoperative follow-up will be made.

Interventions

PROCEDUREinterscalene block

peripheral nerve block

PROCEDUREsuprascapular block + axillary block

peripheral nerve block

Sponsors

Istanbul University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

open

Intervention model description

Study group - Study group- Control group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* accepting the study protocol, * age older than 18 years and younger than 90 years, * undergoing shoulder arthroplasty surgery * the American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status of I-II-III-IV

Exclusion criteria

* severe respiratory distress * patients with local anesthetic allergy * contralateral hemidiaphragmatic parrhesia * recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy * infection at the injection site * coagulation disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid (mg) consumption48 hoursOpioid (mg) consumption
Measurement of postoperative pain48 hoursVAS (visual analog scale) (0: no pain, 10: the worst pain imaginable)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperatif complicationpostoperative period up to 3 daysyes-no
Operation timeduring surgeryminutes
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Will be done 3 times 1- on pre-operative hospitalization 2- in the hospital after surgery 3- in the 1st month follow-up after surgery0-9: indicates minimal depression 10-18: indicates mild depression 19-29: indicates moderate depression 30-63: indicates severe depression.
Patient satisfactionpostoperative period up to 3 days5-point Likert scale: very satisfied (= 5), relatively satisfied (= 4), fairly satisfied (= 3), relatively dissatisfied (= 2) and very dissatisfied (= 1)
Hospital staypostoperative period up to 3 daysdays

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026