Skip to content

Anaesthetic Efficacy of 2% Mepivacaine Versus 4% Articaine With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Anaesthetic Efficacy of 2% Mepivacaine Versus 4% Articaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis in Mandibular Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04822415
Enrollment
330
Registered
2021-03-30
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2021-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial was to assess the effect of 3.6 mL 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine compared to 3.4 mL 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine on the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block for patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars.

Detailed description

The aim of this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial was to assess the effect of 3.6 mL 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine compared to 3.4 mL 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine on the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block for patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. Patients were clinically and radiographically examined and their eligibility assessed and preoperative pain was measured using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: experimental group (2% mepivacaine) and the control group (4% articaine). After 15 minutes of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), patients reporting lip numbness had their molars accessed. No-to-mild pain response was considered success during root canal preparation.

Interventions

DRUGMepivacaine

IANB using 3.6 ml of 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine.

IANB using 3.4 ml of 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients in good health (American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I or II). * Patients having symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in one of their mandibular molars. * Age range between 18 to 50 years. * Patients who can understand Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). * Positive patient acceptance and the ability to sign an informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant females. * Patients allergic to articaine, mepivacaine and/or any used medication or material. * Patients having active sites of pathosis in the area of injection. * Patients having active pain in more than one molar. * Patients who had taken analgesics in the 12 hours preceding treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anaesthetic successIntraoperativeSuccess of mandibular inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia during access cavity preparation and instrumentation measured using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) so that no-or-mild pain is considered as anesthetic success and moderate-to-severe pain is considered anesthetic failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for Supplemental anaesthesiaIntraoperativeThe need for supplemental anaesthesia to complete treatment (Yes/No).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026