Skip to content

Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Mild-to-Moderate or Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Mild-to-Moderate or Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04821050
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-03-29
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

rheumatoid arthritis, Sacral nerve, Sacral nerve stimulation, Neuromodulation, randomized clinical trial, drug refractory

Brief summary

This pilot study will assess the efficacy of sacral never stimulation (SNS) for the treatment of adult patients with active, mild-to-moderate rheumatoid arthritis or those with refractory disease. The study will enroll 60 subjects in a single center. All eligible subjects will be randomly divided into two groups at a ratio of 1:1. Half of the subjects will receive SNS (treatment) and the other half will receive sham stimulation (control). Subjects will be followed up for 2-4 weeks, according to their response to the treatment. Disease activity score, patient report outcomes and serum inflammatory cytokines will be observed before and after treatment.

Detailed description

Studies have shown that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) may exert an anti-inflammatory effect through mechanisms like cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAP). This anti-inflammatory function of VNS has been verified in collagen induced arthritis (CIA) rats, RA patients, and animal models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In recent years, it was reported that sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a safer way to exert a similar anti-inflammatory effect as VNS. Therefore, this study aims to explore the therapeutic effect of SNS on RA patients. This is a randomized controlled clinical trial which will enroll 60 eligible RA patients. These subjects will be divided into two groups at a ratio of 1:1, the treatment group (Group 1) who will receive SNS and the control group (Group 2) who will receive sham stimulation. The patients will lie in prone position. In Group 1, a senior acupuncture doctor will pierce filiform needles through the sacral foramen into the S3 and S4 sacral nerves. These sites correspond to the Zhongliao and Xialiao acupoints in Traditional Chinese Medicine. In Group 2, shallow acupuncture stimulation will be performed at sites 8-10cm away from the acupoints in Group 1. In both groups, electrodes will be clamped on the filiform needles and an electrical current of 0.5 mA will be delivered. The stimulation will last for 60 minutes every time, once a day for 2 weeks. If the subjects respond to the treatment well, SNS treatment will be continued for 2 weeks. The following parameters will be measured before and 2-4 weeks after treatment: 1. Disease activity-related indexes of RA: swelling joint number (SJC), tender joint number (TJC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP); 2. Serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, IL-17, TNF-α, etc; 3. Patient report outcomes: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ; 4. Indexes of autonomic nervous function: serum level of norepinephrine (NE), heart rate variability (HRV).

Interventions

A senior acupuncture doctor will pierce filiform needles through the sacral foramen into the S3 and S4 sacral nerves. These sites correspond to the Zhongliao and Xialiao acupoints in Traditional Chinese Medicine. Electrodes will be clamped on the filiform needles and an electrical current of 0.5 mA will be delivered. The stimulation will last for 60 minutes every time, once a day for 2 weeks.

DEVICESham stimulation

Shallow acupuncture stimulation will be performed at sites 8-10cm away from the acupoints in Group 1. Electrodes will be clamped on the filiform needles and an electrical current of 0.5 mA will be delivered. The stimulation will last for 60 minutes every time, once a day for 2 weeks.

Sponsors

Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18-65 years of age at screening * Met the American College of Rheumatology criteria (2010) for RA * Active mild to moderate RA (defined as 3.2 \< DAS28-CRP\< 5.1) naïve to any medication; or refractory RA who demonstrated an inadequate response or loss of response to 2 or more conventional synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs) after treatment for at least 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Any severe chronic or uncontrolled comorbid disease, such as important organ failure, degree II and III heart block, clinically significant cardiovascular disease, severe infection, tumor, etc; * Combined with other connective tissue diseases * Cognitive impairment and can't cooperate * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Bleeding or coagulation disorders * Localized skin infections * Intra-articular corticosteroid or pulse steroid within 2 weeks preceding the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at Week 2 from Day 0Week 2Difference between treatment and control groups in the proportion of subjects who achieve at least 20% improvement from baseline to Week 2 in tender and swollen joint counts of 28 joints (scale 0=best to 28=worse) and 3 out of the following 5 measures: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (scale 0=no difficulty to 3=unable to do), subject global assessment (0=best to 10=worse), subject pain (0=no pain to 10=worse), evaluator's global assessment (0=best to 10=worse), or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration (mg/mL) with higher values representing worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3. Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) response (MCID -0.22)week 2HAQ-DI response based on the MCID of -0.22 from baseline
Pain Visual Analogue Scale (scoring range 0 ~ 10)week 2Changes from baseline to week 2.
1. The Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) good or moderate response as defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)week 2The DAS28-CRP good or moderate response as defined by EULAR based on a composite score of 4 items: tender and swollen joint counts of 28 joints (scale 0=best to 28=worse), subject global assessment (0=best to 10=worse) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration (mg/L) with higher values representing worse outcome
DAS28-CRP response (MCID -1.2) at Week 2wee 2DAS28-CRP response based on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of -1.2 from baseline

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactDinglei Su, Dr.
sudinglei@163.com+8613814011654

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 10, 2026