Interstitial Cystitis
Conditions
Keywords
Interstitial cystitis, Complementary and Alternative medicine, Yoga, Meditation
Brief summary
This study is examining impact of pain on daily life, the ability to function and treatments used for patients with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome before and after a program of mindfulness and yoga, in comparison to patients who are undergoing treatment with their providers.
Detailed description
This is a randomized control trial comparing women diagnosed with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (ICPBS) receiving usual ICPBS care to those treated with usual care supplemented with meditation and yoga. Both groups continued their current ICPBS treatment regimens. Participants in the intervention group additionally received a commercially available meditation application and a yoga tutorial video. Women in either group were followed weekly for three months. Validated questionnaires were used to compare treatment response from baseline to 12 weeks of intervention for both groups. The primary outcome was the patient report on the global response assessment (GRA), and we required a sample size of 82 patients (41 per group) to detect a difference of 30% with a 10% margin of error (alpha of 0.05) with 80% power. Other questionnaires collected included the PROMIS pain interference scale, the interstitial cystitis problem index and symptom index (ICPI and ICSI), the VAS pain scale, treatment compliance, and treatment escalation.
Interventions
This is the treatment program devised win conjunction with a pelvic floor physical therapist. It is a daily yoga series and mindfulness with a Smartphone app.
This is standard treatment for Interstitial cystitis with your provider.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Female * \>=Age 18 * IC/BPS diagnosis * English or Spanish reading/writing * Own a Smartphone and able to watch online yoga tutorials * Ability/willingness to participate in follow up questionnaires * ICSI/ICPI \>6 at baseline * Physical exam in the past 2 years by urogynecology or gynecologist
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnancy or lactating * Inability to speak/write in English/Spanish * Known history of recurrent UTI * Urinary retention ( PVR\>150 ml) * History of augmentation cystoplasty or urinary diversion. * History of chemotherapy/radiation or radiation induced cystitis * Hunner's Ulcers demonstrated in last 6 months by cystoscopy * Parkinsonism with neurogenic bladder * Multiple Sclerosis with neurogenic bladder * CVA with residual deficits * Patients with severe mobility impairment and inability to perform yoga postures * Patients who are hard of hearing or visually impaired * Imprisoned patients
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Designated as Treatment Responders Based on Global Response Assessment (GRA) | 3 months | This is a validated single question that determines treatment response. Participants were considered treatment responders if they answered markedly improved/moderately improved on the GRA at 12 weeks. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| O'Leary-Sant: Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index | change from baseline to 3 months | The Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index Scale (ICPI) is a scale of point ranging from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating WORSE OUTCOMES (more problems) |
| Pain VAS Score | change from baseline to 3 months | The Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score ranges from 1 to 10, with patients ranking their pain from no pain (score of 0) to most severe pain imaginable (score of 10), with high scores indicating WORSE OUTCOMES (more pain) |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Subscale | change from baseline to 3 months | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale has a score range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety levels (WORSE OUTCOMES). Each item on the scale is scored from 0 to 3, contributing to the total possible score of 21 for the anxiety subscale at most (highest level of anxiety). A score of 0-7 is generally considered normal, 8-10 as mild anxiety, 11-14 as moderate anxiety, and 15 or higher as severe anxiety. |
| O'Leary-Sant: Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index | change from baseline to 3 months | This is a validated questionnaire to evaluate interstitial cystitis symptoms. The Interstitial Cystitis Symptoms Index Scale (ICSI) is a scale of point ranging from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating WORSE OUTCOMES (more symptoms) |
| PROMIS Pain Interference Score | change froom baseline to 3 months | The PROMIS Pain Interference Scale (PIS) has a raw score ranging from 5 to 30, with higher scores indicating a greater level of pain interference in life (WORSE OUTCOMES). |
| Pain Self-efficacy-2 Score | change from baseline to 3 months | The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater belief in one's ability to manage pain and function (BETTER OUTCOMES). |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Subscale | change from baseline to 3 months | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression subscale has a score ranging 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater levels of depression (WORSE OUTCOME). Each item on the scale is scored from 0 to 3, contributing to the total possible score of 21 for the depression subscale at most (highest level of depression). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Treatment This is an individual treatment program devised by a pelvic floor physical therapist including a daily yoga series and mindfulness via a Smartphone app.
Treatment: This is the treatment program devised win conjunction with a pelvic floor physical therapist. It is a daily yoga series and mindfulness with a Smartphone app.
Usual Cares: This is standard treatment for Interstitial cystitis with your provider. | 49 |
| Control These are participants undergoing regular treatment for interstitial cystitis with their providers
Usual Cares: This is standard treatment for Interstitial cystitis with your provider. | 48 |
| Total | 97 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 6 | 9 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Treatment | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 49 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 | 50 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 17 | 49.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8 |
| Age of diagnosis of ICBPS | 45 years | 39 years | 41.2 years |
| Education 4y college degree | 19 participants | 15 participants | 34 participants |
| Education Associate degree | 9 participants | 8 participants | 17 participants |
| Education Graduate degree | 12 participants | 17 participants | 29 participants |
| Education HIgh schooil or high school equivalency certificate | 9 participants | 7 participants | 16 participants |
| Education Unknown or not recorded | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 36 Participants | 34 Participants | 70 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants |
| History of substance use disorder | 3 participants | 2 participants | 5 participants |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression anxiety score | 9.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 | 9.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 | 9.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression depression score | 5.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6 | 6.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 | 5.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 |
| Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index Score | 10 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 | 11.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 | 10.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 |
| Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index Score | 11.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6 | 13.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 | 12.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 |
| Marital status Divorced, separated, widowed | 11 participants | 11 participants | 22 participants |
| Marital status Married | 28 participants | 25 participants | 53 participants |
| Marital status Single | 10 participants | 12 participants | 22 participants |
| Pain self efficacy score | 7.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 | 7.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 | 7.15 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 |
| Pain Visual Analog Scale Score | 4.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 | 5.0 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 | 4.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 |
| Prior treatments Cystoscopic hydrodistension under general anesthesia | 2 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants |
| Prior treatments Education, behavioral modification, stress management | 23 participants | 21 participants | 44 participants |
| Prior treatments Intradetrusor botulinum toxin A, sacral neuromodulation | 1 participants | 1 participants | 2 participants |
| Prior treatments Medications, intravesical instillations, physical therapy | 48 participants | 48 participants | 96 participants |
| PROMIS Pain Interference Score | 17.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 | 18.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 | 17.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 46 Participants | 44 Participants | 90 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 49 participants | 48 participants | 97 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 49 Participants | 48 Participants | 97 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 49 | 0 / 48 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 49 | 0 / 48 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 49 | 0 / 48 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Designated as Treatment Responders Based on Global Response Assessment (GRA)
This is a validated single question that determines treatment response. Participants were considered treatment responders if they answered markedly improved/moderately improved on the GRA at 12 weeks.
Time frame: 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Number of Participants Designated as Treatment Responders Based on Global Response Assessment (GRA) | 31 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants Designated as Treatment Responders Based on Global Response Assessment (GRA) | 10 Participants |
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Subscale
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale has a score range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety levels (WORSE OUTCOMES). Each item on the scale is scored from 0 to 3, contributing to the total possible score of 21 for the anxiety subscale at most (highest level of anxiety). A score of 0-7 is generally considered normal, 8-10 as mild anxiety, 11-14 as moderate anxiety, and 15 or higher as severe anxiety.
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Subscale | -1.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Control | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Subscale | -0.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Subscale
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression subscale has a score ranging 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater levels of depression (WORSE OUTCOME). Each item on the scale is scored from 0 to 3, contributing to the total possible score of 21 for the depression subscale at most (highest level of depression).
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Subscale | -1.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Control | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Subscale | -0.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
O'Leary-Sant: Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index
The Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index Scale (ICPI) is a scale of point ranging from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating WORSE OUTCOMES (more problems)
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | O'Leary-Sant: Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index | -3.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Control | O'Leary-Sant: Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index | -1.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
O'Leary-Sant: Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index
This is a validated questionnaire to evaluate interstitial cystitis symptoms. The Interstitial Cystitis Symptoms Index Scale (ICSI) is a scale of point ranging from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating WORSE OUTCOMES (more symptoms)
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | O'Leary-Sant: Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index | -3.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Control | O'Leary-Sant: Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index | -1.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
Pain Self-efficacy-2 Score
The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater belief in one's ability to manage pain and function (BETTER OUTCOMES).
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Pain Self-efficacy-2 Score | 1.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Control | Pain Self-efficacy-2 Score | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
Pain VAS Score
The Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score ranges from 1 to 10, with patients ranking their pain from no pain (score of 0) to most severe pain imaginable (score of 10), with high scores indicating WORSE OUTCOMES (more pain)
Time frame: change from baseline to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Pain VAS Score | -1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Control | Pain VAS Score | -0.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
PROMIS Pain Interference Score
The PROMIS Pain Interference Scale (PIS) has a raw score ranging from 5 to 30, with higher scores indicating a greater level of pain interference in life (WORSE OUTCOMES).
Time frame: change froom baseline to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | PROMIS Pain Interference Score | -5.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| Control | PROMIS Pain Interference Score | -3.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.2 |