Skip to content

Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Endotracheal Tubes in Intensive Care : Elastic Adhesive Strips vs Lace In A Protective Sheath.

Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Endotracheal Tubes in Intensive Care : Elastic Adhesive Strips vs Lace In A Protective Sheath. A Randomized Multicenter, Cluster and Crossover Controlled Study. FIXATUB

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04819425
Acronym
FIXATUB
Enrollment
768
Registered
2021-03-29
Start date
2021-06-28
Completion date
2023-08-10
Last updated
2023-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation Complication

Keywords

Endotracheal Tube, Securement, Facial skin tear, Lip ulcer, Critical care

Brief summary

Every year, in France, nearly 100,000 patients hospitalized in intensive care more than 48 hours require invasive respiratory assistance via an endotracheal tube. Appropriate tube fixation is essential to ensure effective ventilation while minimizing potential complications such as accidental extubations. However, the fixation system chosen may lead to peribuccal lesions such as bedsores, shearing or cutaneous-mucous tear. These lesions are painful for patients and often unsightly as scar may remain. There are no formal recommendations for the use of any type of fixing system. Thus, systems used to secure the endotracheal tube vary from one ICU to another. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the fixing strategy by elastic adhesive tape reduces the risk of developing a peribuccal lesion during the time of the endotracheal tube's maintenance.

Interventions

DEVICEElastic Adhesive Strips

Securement of Endotracheal tube with Elastic Adhesive Strips

DEVICELace in A Protective Sheath

Securement of Endotracheal tube with Lace in A Protective Sheath

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cluster and Crossover

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit * Age over 18 * Intubation for estimated duration \> 48h * Patient treated with vasopressors * Patient or relative who received the information and are not opposed to study participation or patient included under the emergency procedure in the absence of contactable family members.

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-existing face lesions at ICU admission along the path of the endotracheal tube fixing. * Admitted patient already intubated upon transfer from another ICU * Nasotracheal intubation * Patient in isolation for suspected COVID or clinically proven COVID * Admitted tracheotomized patient * Pregnant, nursing, parturient woman * Lack of social security affiliation * Moribund * Incapable major (under guardianship, curatorship) * Patient deprived of liberty by court order

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peribuccal lesionup to 10 days after intubationAppearance of at least one peribuccal lesion during the first 10 days of maintaining the endotracheal tube inserted orally. Presence of peribuccal lesion will be validated on picture by an independent review committee. The picture will be taken daily without the visible fixing system (blind maintained for the adjudication committee) from J0 to J10 at the site of the endotracheal tube.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026