Skip to content

Evaluate the Performance of JOURNEY II CR in TKA Populations

A Prospective Multi-Centre Study in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement With JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04818840
Acronym
JIICRTKA
Enrollment
62
Registered
2021-03-26
Start date
2022-03-03
Completion date
2024-03-15
Last updated
2025-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty, Knee, Replacement

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Brief summary

Background: The JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System consists of femoral component made from oxidized zirconium (OXINIUM) Purpose: Post-market evidence generation for JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System Objectives: Evaluate the performance of JOURNEY II CR TKA in APAC populations Evaluate the impact of patella resurfacing on the outcomes of JOURNEY II CR TKA Research participants / locations: A total of up to 480 knees' information will be collected in up to 15 sites in India, China mainland, Hong Kong, Singapore, Thailand and Japan There will be up to 240 knees for resurfaced patella group and up to 240 knees for un-resurfaced patella group.

Interventions

DEVICEResurfaced Patella

JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System was used for Total Knee replacement

PROCEDUREUn-resurfaced Patella

JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System was used for Total Knee replacement

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with degenerative osteoarthritis. * Subject is planning to have TKA using JOURNEY II CR. * Subject is able and willing to provide voluntary consent to study participation. * Subject is 18-80 years old (inclusive) \* (\* For Japan, the minimum inclusion age is 20 years old.)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with rheumatoid arthritis/inflammatory arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis. * Previous surgeries including HTO, UKA or TKA on the subject knee. * Subject is pregnant or breast feeding or those at a child-bearing age planning to become pregnant during the follow up. * Subject does not meet the indication or is contraindicated for JOURNEY II CR's IFU.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 2 Years2 yearsThe Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a Patient Reported Outcome questionnaire that was developed to specifically assess the patient's perspective of outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The OKS is a patient self-completion PRO containing 12 equally weighted questions on activities of daily living. The OKS has been developed and validated specifically to assess perceived function and pain answered on a Likert scale after TKA. Responses to each question ranges from 0-4 with a range of a possible overall score from 0-48. A score of 0 is the worst possible outcome while a score of 48 is the best possible outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxford Knee Score (OKS)Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 3 yearsThe Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaire that was developed to specifically assess the patient's perspective of outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The OKS is a patient self-completion PRO containing 12 equally weighted questions on activities of daily living. The OKS has been developed and validated specifically to assess perceived function and pain answered on a Likert scale after TKA. Overall scores range from 0 to 48, where a score of 0 is the worst possible outcome and a score of 48 is the best possible outcome.
Knee Society Score (KSS): Objective Knee ScorePre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 yearsThe KSS is a validated tool that combines an objective physician-derived component with a subjective subject-derived component and consists of 4 separate sub-scales: The Objective Knee Score sub-scale is assessed by the surgeon, focusing on clinical measures such as pain, range of motion, and stability. The score is 7 items on a scale of 0 to 100 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Knee Society Score (KSS): Patient Satisfaction ScorePre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 yearsThe KSS is a validated tool that combines an objective physician-derived component with a subjective subject-derived component and consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The Patient Satisfaction sub-scale score evaluates the participant's satisfaction with their knee function and pain relief. The score is five items on a scale of 0 to 40 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Knee Society Score (KSS): Patient Expectation ScorePre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 yearsThe KSS is a validated tool that combines an objective physician-derived component with a subjective subject-derived component and consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The Patient Expectation sub-scale score assesses the participant's expectations regarding their knee function and outcomes. The score is three items on a scale of 3 to 15 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Knee Society Score (KSS): Functional Knee ScorePre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 yearsThe KSS is a validated tool that combines an objective physician-derived component with a subjective subject-derived component and consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The Functional Knee Score is derived from assessments of walking and standing, standard activities, advanced activities, and discretionary activities to evaluate the participant's ability to perform daily activities and their overall functional capabilities. The score is 19 items on a scale of 0 to 100 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Patient ExpectationPre-OperativePatient expectation measured by asking participants to select ONE activity that matters to you most and you expect to participate after the surgery? Responses were categorized as: 1. Regularly participate in impact sports (e.g., jogging, tennis, skiing, acrobatics, ballet, heavy labor, backpacking, basketball, mountain climbing or badminton with running & jumping) 2. Sometime participate in impact sports 3. Regularly participate in very active events (e.g., bowling, golf, table tennis, badminton without running & jumping or fitness walking) 4. Regularly participate in active events (e.g., bicycling or square dancing) 5. Regularly participate in moderate activities (e.g., swimming & unlimited housework, shopping or Tai Chi) 6. Sometimes participate in moderate activities 7. Regularly participate in mild activities (e.g., walking, limited housework, & limited shopping) 8. Sometimes participate in mild activities 9. Restricted to minimal activities of daily living 10. Missing
Patient Satisfaction6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 yearsPatient satisfaction is measured by a corresponding question based on their expectation asking, How satisfied are you with the surgery meeting your expectation? Responses were categorized as: * Very Satisfied * Satisfied * Neutral * Dissatisfied * Very Dissatisfied * Missing
Radiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic FindingsImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the number of participants with the presence of radiographic findings categorized as: * Yes * No * Missing
Radiographic Assessment: Aseptic LooseningImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of aseptic loosening as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 yearsThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) comprises measures for the assessment of joint-specific patient reported outcomes. This questionnaire focuses on the study participant's awareness of the partially or fully replaced knee joint in everyday life. Joint awareness can be simply defined as any unintended perception of a joint. Participants are asked to rate their awareness of their knee arthroplasty in 12 questions with a five-point Likert response format: Never, almost never, seldom, sometimes and mostly. The item scores are summed and linearly transformed in a 0 to 100 scale with a high value reflecting the ability of the subject to forget about the replaced knee joint during the activities of daily living (i.e., a higher score is a better outcome).
Radiographic Assessment: Bone FractureImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of bone fracture as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing
Radiographic Assessment: Cement FractureImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of cement fracture as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing
Radiographic Assessment: OsteolysisImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of osteolysis as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing
Radiographic Assessment: SubsidenceImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of subsidence as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing
Radiographic Assessment: Implant MigrationImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of implant migration as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing
Radiographic Assessment: Stress ShieldingImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of stress shielding as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing
Radiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement DebondingImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of implant-cement debonding as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing
Radiographic Assessment: Mechanical Axis Alignment of the Knee JointPre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to determine mechanical axis alignment of the knee joint in degrees measured through the centre of the hip (centre of the spherical femoral head), centre of the knee (centre of the tibial plateau) and centre of the ankle (centre of the talus).
Radiographic Assessment: Septic LooseningImmediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsStandard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of septic loosening as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Countries

China, India, Japan, Singapore, Thailand

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

There were 62 participants in total enrolled into the study across 5 study sites. The 60 participants that received the study device were included in the analysis. Two participants were excluded before assignment to groups because they did not receive the study device.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Resurfaced/Non Patella
Undergoing Total Knee Replacement with JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System Resurfaced Patella: JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System was used for Total Knee replacement
44
Un-resurfaced Patella
Undergoing Total Knee Replacement with JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System Un-resurfaced Patella: JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System was used for Total Knee replacement
16
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up05
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudySite Terminated by Sponsor03
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor437
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicResurfaced/Non PatellaUn-resurfaced PatellaTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
34 Participants12 Participants46 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Age, Continuous69.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
68.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
69.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Body Mass Index (BMI)27.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
27.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
27.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
Height155.7 centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
157.6 centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
156.2 centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Operative Diagnosis
Avascular necrosis
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Operative Diagnosis
Fractures that were unmanageable using other techniques
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Operative Diagnosis
Functional deformity
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Operative Diagnosis
Missing
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Operative Diagnosis
Osteoarthritis
43 Participants16 Participants59 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
44 Participants16 Participants60 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
0 participants10 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
1 participants3 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
43 participants0 participants43 participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants11 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants5 Participants15 Participants
Weight67.5 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
67.4 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
67.5 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 440 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 441 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 442 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 2 Years

The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a Patient Reported Outcome questionnaire that was developed to specifically assess the patient's perspective of outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The OKS is a patient self-completion PRO containing 12 equally weighted questions on activities of daily living. The OKS has been developed and validated specifically to assess perceived function and pain answered on a Likert scale after TKA. Responses to each question ranges from 0-4 with a range of a possible overall score from 0-48. A score of 0 is the worst possible outcome while a score of 48 is the best possible outcome.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Data not collected for outcome because no participant reached the 2 year time frame due to early termination of the study. While the general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for this visit.

Secondary

Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)

The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) comprises measures for the assessment of joint-specific patient reported outcomes. This questionnaire focuses on the study participant's awareness of the partially or fully replaced knee joint in everyday life. Joint awareness can be simply defined as any unintended perception of a joint. Participants are asked to rate their awareness of their knee arthroplasty in 12 questions with a five-point Likert response format: Never, almost never, seldom, sometimes and mostly. The item scores are summed and linearly transformed in a 0 to 100 scale with a high value reflecting the ability of the subject to forget about the replaced knee joint during the activities of daily living (i.e., a higher score is a better outcome).

Time frame: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. Data not collected for all time points due to early termination of the study. While the general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for any visit on or after the 2 year visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Resurfaced/Non PatellaForgotten Joint Score (FJS)6 months40.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
Resurfaced/Non PatellaForgotten Joint Score (FJS)1 year49.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.6
Un-resurfaced PatellaForgotten Joint Score (FJS)6 months72.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.4
Un-resurfaced PatellaForgotten Joint Score (FJS)1 year89.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Secondary

Knee Society Score (KSS): Functional Knee Score

The KSS is a validated tool that combines an objective physician-derived component with a subjective subject-derived component and consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The Functional Knee Score is derived from assessments of walking and standing, standard activities, advanced activities, and discretionary activities to evaluate the participant's ability to perform daily activities and their overall functional capabilities. The score is 19 items on a scale of 0 to 100 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. Data not collected for all time points due to early termination of the study. While the general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for any visit on or after the 2 year visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Functional Knee ScorePre-Operative47.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Functional Knee Score6 months80.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Functional Knee Score1 year83.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Functional Knee ScorePre-Operative47.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Functional Knee Score6 months86.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Functional Knee Score1 year89.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Secondary

Knee Society Score (KSS): Objective Knee Score

The KSS is a validated tool that combines an objective physician-derived component with a subjective subject-derived component and consists of 4 separate sub-scales: The Objective Knee Score sub-scale is assessed by the surgeon, focusing on clinical measures such as pain, range of motion, and stability. The score is 7 items on a scale of 0 to 100 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. Data not collected for all time points due to early termination of the study. While the general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for any visit on or after the 2 year visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Objective Knee ScorePre-Operative23.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Objective Knee Score6 months70.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Objective Knee Score1 year72.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Objective Knee ScorePre-Operative28.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Objective Knee Score6 months68.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Secondary

Knee Society Score (KSS): Patient Expectation Score

The KSS is a validated tool that combines an objective physician-derived component with a subjective subject-derived component and consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The Patient Expectation sub-scale score assesses the participant's expectations regarding their knee function and outcomes. The score is three items on a scale of 3 to 15 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. Data not collected for all time points due to early termination of the study. While the general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for any visit on or after the 2 year visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Expectation ScorePre-Operative13.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Expectation Score6 months9.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Expectation Score1 year9.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Expectation ScorePre-Operative14.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Expectation Score6 months11.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Expectation Score1 year10.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Secondary

Knee Society Score (KSS): Patient Satisfaction Score

The KSS is a validated tool that combines an objective physician-derived component with a subjective subject-derived component and consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The Patient Satisfaction sub-scale score evaluates the participant's satisfaction with their knee function and pain relief. The score is five items on a scale of 0 to 40 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. Data not collected for all time points due to early termination of the study. While the general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for any visit on or after the 2 year visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Satisfaction ScorePre-Operative11.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Satisfaction Score6 months22.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Resurfaced/Non PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Satisfaction Score1 year28.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Satisfaction ScorePre-Operative11.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Satisfaction Score6 months28.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Un-resurfaced PatellaKnee Society Score (KSS): Patient Satisfaction Score1 year31.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Secondary

Oxford Knee Score (OKS)

The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaire that was developed to specifically assess the patient's perspective of outcome following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The OKS is a patient self-completion PRO containing 12 equally weighted questions on activities of daily living. The OKS has been developed and validated specifically to assess perceived function and pain answered on a Likert scale after TKA. Overall scores range from 0 to 48, where a score of 0 is the worst possible outcome and a score of 48 is the best possible outcome.

Time frame: Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. Data not collected for all time points due to early termination of the study. While the general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for any visit on or after the 2 year visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Resurfaced/Non PatellaOxford Knee Score (OKS)Pre-Operative21.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Resurfaced/Non PatellaOxford Knee Score (OKS)6 months35.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Resurfaced/Non PatellaOxford Knee Score (OKS)1 year38.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Un-resurfaced PatellaOxford Knee Score (OKS)Pre-Operative22.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Un-resurfaced PatellaOxford Knee Score (OKS)6 months37.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Un-resurfaced PatellaOxford Knee Score (OKS)1 year44.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Patient Expectation

Patient expectation measured by asking participants to select ONE activity that matters to you most and you expect to participate after the surgery? Responses were categorized as: 1. Regularly participate in impact sports (e.g., jogging, tennis, skiing, acrobatics, ballet, heavy labor, backpacking, basketball, mountain climbing or badminton with running & jumping) 2. Sometime participate in impact sports 3. Regularly participate in very active events (e.g., bowling, golf, table tennis, badminton without running & jumping or fitness walking) 4. Regularly participate in active events (e.g., bicycling or square dancing) 5. Regularly participate in moderate activities (e.g., swimming & unlimited housework, shopping or Tai Chi) 6. Sometimes participate in moderate activities 7. Regularly participate in mild activities (e.g., walking, limited housework, & limited shopping) 8. Sometimes participate in mild activities 9. Restricted to minimal activities of daily living 10. Missing

Time frame: Pre-Operative

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in impact sports5 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationSometime participate in impact sports0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in very active events4 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in active events0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in moderate activities14 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationSometimes participate in moderate activities2 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in mild activities8 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationSometimes participate in mild activities1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationRestricted to minimal activities of daily living1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient ExpectationMissing9 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationSometimes participate in mild activities0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in impact sports1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationSometimes participate in moderate activities0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationSometime participate in impact sports1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationMissing0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in very active events0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in mild activities5 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in active events4 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationRestricted to minimal activities of daily living0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient ExpectationRegularly participate in moderate activities5 Participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction is measured by a corresponding question based on their expectation asking, How satisfied are you with the surgery meeting your expectation? Responses were categorized as: * Very Satisfied * Satisfied * Neutral * Dissatisfied * Very Dissatisfied * Missing

Time frame: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. Data not collected for all time points due to early termination of the study. While the general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for any visit on or after the 2 year visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsVery Satisfied4 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsSatisfied12 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsNeutral5 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsDissatisfied1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsMissing12 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearVery Satisfied5 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearSatisfied10 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearNeutral4 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearDissatisfied1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearVery Dissatisfied1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsVery Satisfied3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearVery Satisfied1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsSatisfied3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearDissatisfied0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsNeutral3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearSatisfied3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsDissatisfied0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearMissing0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction1 yearNeutral0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaPatient Satisfaction6 monthsMissing0 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of aseptic loosening as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. While general study duration covers 2 years, there were multiple sites with no participant reaching the 2 year visit for data collection due to study termination. Responses from a site indicated radiographic findings for participants in the un-resurfaced patella group (i.e., Yes to presence of radiographic findings), but 'No' indicated for Aseptic Loosening radiographic finding option.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening6 monthsMissing36 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening6 monthsYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing43 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening1 yearNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening6 monthsNo1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening1 yearMissing27 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening1 yearMissing1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening6 monthsNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening1 yearYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Aseptic Loosening1 yearNo3 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of bone fracture as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. While general study duration covers 2 years, there were multiple sites with no participant reaching the 2 year visit for data collection due to study termination. Responses from one site indicated radiographic findings for participants in the un-resurfaced patella group (i.e., Yes to presence of radiographic findings), but 'No' indicated for the Bone Fracture radiographic finding option.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture6 monthsMissing36 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture6 monthsYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing43 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture1 yearNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture6 monthsNo1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture1 yearMissing27 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture1 yearMissing1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture6 monthsNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture1 yearYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Bone Fracture1 yearNo3 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of cement fracture as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. While general study duration covers 2 years, there were multiple sites with no participant reaching the 2 year visit for data collection due to study termination. Responses from one site indicated radiographic findings for participants in the un-resurfaced patella group (i.e., Yes to presence of radiographic findings), but 'No' indicated for the Cement Fracture radiographic finding option.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture6 monthsMissing36 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture6 monthsYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing43 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture1 yearNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture6 monthsNo1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture1 yearMissing27 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture1 yearMissing1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement FractureImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture6 monthsNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture1 yearYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Cement Fracture1 yearNo3 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of implant-cement debonding as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. While general study duration covers 2 years, there were multiple sites with no participant reaching the 2 year visit for data collection due to study termination. Responses from a site indicated findings for participants in the un-resurfaced patella group (i.e., Yes to presence of radiographic findings), but 'No' indicated for the Implant-Cement Debonding radiographic finding option.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement DebondingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding6 monthsMissing36 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding6 monthsYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement DebondingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing43 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding1 yearNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding6 monthsNo1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding1 yearMissing27 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement DebondingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding1 yearMissing1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement DebondingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement DebondingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement DebondingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding6 monthsNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding1 yearYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant-Cement Debonding1 yearNo3 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Implant Migration

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of implant migration as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. While general study duration covers 2 years, there were multiple sites with no participant reaching the 2 year visit for data collection due to study termination. Responses from a site indicated radiographic findings for participants in the un-resurfaced patella group (i.e., Yes to presence of radiographic findings), but 'No' indicated for the Implant Migration radiographic finding option.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant MigrationImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration6 monthsMissing36 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration6 monthsYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant MigrationImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing43 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration1 yearNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration6 monthsNo1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration1 yearMissing27 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant MigrationImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration1 yearMissing1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant MigrationImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant MigrationImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant MigrationImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration6 monthsNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration1 yearYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Implant Migration1 yearNo3 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Mechanical Axis Alignment of the Knee Joint

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to determine mechanical axis alignment of the knee joint in degrees measured through the centre of the hip (centre of the spherical femoral head), centre of the knee (centre of the tibial plateau) and centre of the ankle (centre of the talus).

Time frame: Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: While general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for any visit on or after the 2 year visit. Additionally, 0 participants were analyzed at 1 year for mechanical axis alignment because data was not provided by the third party central imaging lab due to contract suspension and later study termination, so data after 6 months cannot be reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Mechanical Axis Alignment of the Knee JointPre-Operative7.1 degreesStandard Deviation 5.1
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Mechanical Axis Alignment of the Knee Joint6 months1.5 degreesStandard Deviation 1.7
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Mechanical Axis Alignment of the Knee JointPre-Operative9.6 degreesStandard Deviation 6.4
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Mechanical Axis Alignment of the Knee Joint6 months1.5 degreesStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Osteolysis

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of osteolysis as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. While general study duration covers 2 years, there were multiple sites with no participant reaching the 2 year visit for data collection due to study termination. Responses from one site indicated radiographic findings for participants in the un-resurfaced patella group (i.e., Yes to presence of radiographic findings), but 'No' indicated for the Osteolysis radiographic finding option.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: OsteolysisImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis6 monthsMissing36 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: OsteolysisImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: OsteolysisImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing43 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis1 yearNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis6 monthsNo1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis1 yearMissing27 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis1 yearMissing1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: OsteolysisImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: OsteolysisImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: OsteolysisImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis6 monthsNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis1 yearYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Osteolysis1 yearNo3 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the number of participants with the presence of radiographic findings categorized as: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. Data not collected for all time points due to early termination of the study. While the general study duration does cover 2 years, there were multiple sites. No participant at any site reached the 2 year time point because the study was terminated before any of the data was collected for any visit on or after the 2 year visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic FindingsImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings6 monthsYes1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic FindingsImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings1 yearNo25 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings6 monthsNo33 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings1 yearMissing2 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic FindingsImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo43 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings1 yearMissing0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic FindingsImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic FindingsImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic FindingsImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings6 monthsYes6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings6 monthsNo3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings6 monthsMissing0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings1 yearYes3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Presence of Radiographic Findings1 yearNo1 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of septic loosening as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. While general study duration covers 2 years, there were multiple sites with no participant reaching the 2 year visit for data collection due to study termination. Responses from a site indicated radiographic findings for participants in the un-resurfaced patella group (i.e., Yes to presence of radiographic findings), but 'No' indicated for the Septic Loosening radiographic finding option.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening6 monthsMissing36 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing43 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening1 yearNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening6 monthsNo1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening1 yearMissing27 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening1 yearMissing1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic LooseningImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening6 monthsNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening1 yearYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Septic Loosening1 yearNo3 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of stress shielding as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. While general study duration covers 2 years, there were multiple sites with no participant reaching the 2 year visit for data collection due to study termination. Responses from a site indicated radiographic findings for participants in the un-resurfaced patella group (i.e., Yes to presence of radiographic findings), but 'No' indicated for the Stress Shielding radiographic finding option.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress ShieldingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding6 monthsMissing36 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding6 monthsYes1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress ShieldingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing43 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding1 yearNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding6 monthsNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding1 yearMissing27 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress ShieldingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding1 yearMissing1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress ShieldingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress ShieldingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress ShieldingImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding6 monthsNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding1 yearYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Stress Shielding1 yearNo3 Participants
Secondary

Radiographic Assessment: Subsidence

Standard radiographic evaluation on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral views performed to identify the radiographic finding type by the presence of subsidence as one of the following: * Yes * No * Missing

Time frame: Immediate Post-op to 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: Participants that received the study device with data collected for the outcome and time frame indicated. While general study duration covers 2 years, there were multiple sites with no participant reaching the 2 year visit for data collection due to study termination. Responses from one site indicated radiographic findings for participants in the un-resurfaced patella group (i.e., Yes to presence of radiographic findings), but 'No' indicated for the Subsidence radiographic finding option.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: SubsidenceImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence6 monthsMissing36 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence6 monthsYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence1 yearYes0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: SubsidenceImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing43 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence1 yearNo0 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence6 monthsNo1 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence1 yearMissing27 Participants
Resurfaced/Non PatellaRadiographic Assessment: SubsidenceImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence1 yearMissing1 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: SubsidenceImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: SubsidenceImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksNo10 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: SubsidenceImmediate Post-Op to 6 weeksMissing6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence6 monthsYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence6 monthsNo6 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence6 monthsMissing3 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence1 yearYes0 Participants
Un-resurfaced PatellaRadiographic Assessment: Subsidence1 yearNo3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026