Caries; Dentin, Dental Caries
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare the survival rate of the conventional restorations with the Hall Technique in carious primary molars.
Detailed description
comparing the survival rate of the conventional restorations with the Hall Technique in carious primary molars.
Interventions
Intra-oral clinical examination is performed and restorations are evaluated by the practitioner. Periapical radiography is taken according to national guidelines.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patients aged five to eight years at the time of dental treatment, * patients attending follow-up appointments * patients with compomer restoration and Hall restoration in their teeth * patients with matching the extent of caries in the two groups
Exclusion criteria
* patients not attending follow-up appointments * patients without both treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The survival rate of Hall Technique and Compomer Restorations | 5 year | 1. Successful: restoration satisfactory, no additional treatment required, no clinical sign and symptoms of pulpal pathology or tooth exfoliated, 2. Minor failure: restoration wear/fracture/loss (restorable) or crown perforation, secondary caries or new caries, reversible pulpitis treated without requiring extraction or pulpotomy, 3. Major failure: the tooth is broken down (unrestorable), inter-radicular radiolucency or internal root resorption, signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis requiring extraction or pulpotomy. 4. The survival analysis: the restorations are assessed as successful or failure. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)