Skip to content

The Preformed Metal Crowns Placed Using the Hall Technique Versus the Conventional Restoration

The Preformed Metal Crowns Placed Using the Hall Technique Versus the Conventional Restoration: A 5-year Retro-prospective Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04818658
Enrollment
26
Registered
2021-03-26
Start date
2021-03-08
Completion date
2021-12-10
Last updated
2022-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caries; Dentin, Dental Caries

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the survival rate of the conventional restorations with the Hall Technique in carious primary molars.

Detailed description

comparing the survival rate of the conventional restorations with the Hall Technique in carious primary molars.

Interventions

OTHERAssessment of the stainless steel crown using the Hall Technique and Compomer Restoration on primary molars

Intra-oral clinical examination is performed and restorations are evaluated by the practitioner. Periapical radiography is taken according to national guidelines.

Sponsors

Bahçeşehir University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients aged five to eight years at the time of dental treatment, * patients attending follow-up appointments * patients with compomer restoration and Hall restoration in their teeth * patients with matching the extent of caries in the two groups

Exclusion criteria

* patients not attending follow-up appointments * patients without both treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The survival rate of Hall Technique and Compomer Restorations5 year1. Successful: restoration satisfactory, no additional treatment required, no clinical sign and symptoms of pulpal pathology or tooth exfoliated, 2. Minor failure: restoration wear/fracture/loss (restorable) or crown perforation, secondary caries or new caries, reversible pulpitis treated without requiring extraction or pulpotomy, 3. Major failure: the tooth is broken down (unrestorable), inter-radicular radiolucency or internal root resorption, signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis requiring extraction or pulpotomy. 4. The survival analysis: the restorations are assessed as successful or failure.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026