Skip to content

Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Versus Macquarie Injury Management Group in Function and Pain of Knee Osteoarthritis

Long Term Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Versus Macquarie Injury Management Group on Function and Pain of Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04818307
Enrollment
26
Registered
2021-03-26
Start date
2020-04-01
Completion date
2020-12-30
Last updated
2021-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Knee Pain, Movement with Mobilization

Brief summary

Knee pain is one of the most usual pain that commonly affects people especially in the late age. It can be caused by osteoarthritis, poor posture or sitting position, bad bending or improper lifting. It is usually not caused by a serious illness. It is the most common cause of disability. To compare the long term effects of Mulligan Mobilization with Movement versus Macquarie Injury Management Group on pain and function of knee osteoarthritis.

Detailed description

It was a randomized clinical trial conducted in Revival Physiotherapy Center, Lahore. A convenient sample of 26 diagnosed patients with osteoarthritis was included in the study. Subjects were randomly distributed in to two groups with use of flip coin method Group of randomization. Group 1 patients got MIMG with routine physical therapy and Group 2 got MWM with routine physical therapy. Visual analogue Scale (VAS),Non modified WOMAC were used to assess all patients before and after 4 weeks of intervention. Statistical analysis was computed by SPSS 20.0.

Interventions

OTHERMacquarie Injury Management group

Group A was treated by MIMG (soft tissue mobilization) with base line treatment (Hot pack for 10 mint, Quadriceps Isometrics, Stretching). For the application of technique subject lies supine with extended knee, therapist places both hands on the knee and gently apply soft tissue release. This procedure was applied for 2 to 3 minutes.

Group B was treated by Mulligan Mobilization with movement with base line treatment (Hot Pack for 10 mints, Quadriceps Isometrics, Stretching). For the application of technique subject lies supine with 30 degree knee flexion, therapist places right hand below the knee and left hand above the knee. Apply the lateral glide on the joint. This procedure was applied for 3 times.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ACR criteria for knee will be over age 50 * less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness, * Crepitus on active motion, * Tenderness * Enlargement * No palpable warmth of synovium. * Osteoarthritis grade 1 and 2 by Kelly-green and Lawrence method.

Exclusion criteria

* Any surgical procedure done in past 6 months and metal implants in lower extremity. * Any infection and neoplastic disorder. * Post traumatic knee stiffness. * Secondary knee O A peripheral vascular disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue scale6 monthsThe visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between no pain and worst pain.
WOMAC6 monthsThe scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. Usually a sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a total WOMAC score, however there are other methods that have been used to combine scores.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026