Skip to content

Stress Recovery Program FOREST for Healthcare Staff

Stress Recovery Program FOREST for Healthcare Staff: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04817995
Acronym
FOREST
Enrollment
208
Registered
2021-03-26
Start date
2021-04-22
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perceived Stress

Keywords

Healthcare staff, Perceived stress, Internet intervention, Recovery, Efficacy

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of an internet-based stress recovery intervention among healthcare staff during COVID-19 pandemic.

Detailed description

Intervention is going to take the form of an internet-based stress recovery intervention consisting of six modules. The themes include introduction, psychological detachment, distancing, mastery, control, and keeping the change alive. These themes were chosen after considering topics that might be the most useful for healthcare staff experiencing high levels of stress. Each module consists of psychoeducation and exercise parts. Psychologist provide individual feedback on completed exercises as well as can be reached on demand. The effect of the intervention will be compared against a waiting list control group. Intervention is in Lithuanian.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFOREST

Intervention is going to take the form of an internet-based stress recovery intervention consisting of six modules. The themes include introduction, psychological detachment, distancing, mastery, control, and keeping the change alive. These themes were chosen after considering topics that might be the most useful for healthcare staff experiencing high levels of stress. Each module consists of psychoeducation and exercise parts. Psychologist provide individual feedback on completed exercises as well as can be reached on demand.

Sponsors

Linkoeping University
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Vilnius University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly allocated either to the intervention or control groups. The control group is a waiting list. The control group will participate in the intervention after it will be completed for the intervention group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* at least 18 years old; * comprehending Lithuanian language; * access to internet; * high levels of stress.

Exclusion criteria

* acute psychiatric crisis; * high suicide risk; * interpersonal violence; * alcohol / drug addiction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change on Recovery Experience QuestionnairePre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatmentChanges on stress recovery are measured. Recovery Experiences Questionnaire (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2007) is a self-report measure and consists of 16 questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (Totally disagree) to 5 (Totally agree). Higher score indicates more pronounced recovery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change on International Trauma QuestionnairePre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatmentChanges on post-traumatic stress disorder are measured. International Trauma Questionanaire (ITQ, Cloitre et al., 2018) is a self-report measure and consists of 18 questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher score indicates more pronounced symptoms.
Change on Moral Injury Outcome ScalePre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatmentChanges on moral injury are measured. Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS, Litz et al., 2020) is a self-report measure and consists of 15 questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (Strongly disagree) to 4 (Strongly agree). Higher score indicates more pronounced moral injury.
Change on Perceived Stress ScalePre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatmentChanges on perceived stress are measured. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4, Cohen et al., 1983) is a self-report measure and consists of 4 questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often). Higher score indicates more pronounced perceived stress.
Change on Patient Health QuestionnairePre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatmentChanges on depression and anxiety are measured. Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4, Kroenke et al., 2009) is a self-report measure and consists of 4 questions. All items are answered on a 4-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). Higher score indicates more pronounced depression and anxiety.
Change on Well-being IndexPre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatmentChanges on well-being are measured. Well-being Index (WHO-5, Bech, 2004) is a self-report measure and consists of 5 questions. All items are answered on a 6-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (At no time) to 5 (All of the time). Higher score indicates more pronounced well-being.

Countries

Lithuania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026