Skip to content

Dietary Recommendations for Reducing Free Sugar Intakes

Dietary Recommendations for Reducing Free Sugar Intakes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04816955
Enrollment
242
Registered
2021-03-25
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2025-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dietary Recommendations

Keywords

free sugars, dietary intake, dietary recommendations

Brief summary

This randomised controlled trial aims to assess the impacts of the current recommendations by Public Health England for reducing free sugar intakes, on total energy intakes of free sugar in a sample of the UK population.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this randomised control trial is to assess the impacts of Public Health England's (PHE) current free sugar reducing advice, for reducing total energy intakes (TEI) of free sugar. A total of 240 participants (age 18-65years) consuming diets \>5% total energy intake from dietary free sugars will be recruited from across the Dorset region. Participants to be randomly assigned into the following recommendation interventions groups: 1) Reduce free sugar intake to \<5% TEI (nutrient-based recommendations); 2) Reduce free sugar intake to \<5% TEI, via reducing intake of specific foods identified as high in free sugars (nutrient- + food-based recommendations); 3) Reduce free sugar intake to \<5% TEI, via reducing intake of specific foods identified as high in free sugars and replace/swap with low sugar versions (nutrient- + food-based recommendations with swaps); and 4) Control Group. The primary outcome will be changes in free sugar consumption from baseline to endpoint at week 12. Secondary outcomes include change in: BMI; dietary profiles; sweetness preference; sweetness liking; food choices; low calorie sweetener intakes and adherence levels.

Interventions

Dietary recommendations, with increasing additional behavioural/practical advice or no dietary recommendations

Sponsors

Bournemouth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The investigator, all researchers and analysts will be blinded to treatment. Participants can not masked.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* aged 18-65 years; * able to provide consent and complete all study materials; * consuming \>5% of TEI from free sugars; and * residing in the South of England.

Exclusion criteria

* individuals who are pregnant or breastfeeding; * underweight (BMI \<18.5); * have pre-existing medical conditions affecting swallow ability, taste and smell perception; * currently or within 3 months of starting the study are following a specific dietary programme (e.g.: Slimming World); * current smokers or have smoked within 3 months of the study start date; * have pre-existing clinical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, eating disorders, Crohn's disease and other illness's leading to participants receiving external nutritional advice and dietary restrictions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Free Sugar Intakes12 weeks from baselinePercentage energy intake from free sugars, assessed using diet diaries
Number of Participants Who Adhered to the Recommendations Provided12 weeks from baselineAdherence to the recommendations provided, assessed using diet diaries and self-reported adherence

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sweet Food Preferences12 weeks from baselinePreferences for various sweet foods/fluids, assessed using a taste test, where participants sample several sweet and non-sweet foods and rate them for pleasantness on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale. Higher scores signify stronger preferences
Sweet Food Choices12 weeks from baselineSelection of sweet foods/fluids at a given meal, assessed where participants can consume freely from a meal composed of sweet and non-sweet foods, and proportion of sweet foods consumed is measured in terms of weight consumed
Sweet Food Attitudes12 weeks from baselineAttitudes towards sugar, sweeteners, and sweet-tasting foods, assessed using a questionnaire, soon to be published. Higher scores denote stronger attitudes.
Dietary Intakes12 weeks from baselineEnergy intake, assessed using diet diaries
Eating-based AttitudesBaseline to 12 weeksAttitudes towards eating, assessed using the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (Karlsson J, et al. IJO 2000; 24: 1715-1725)
Eating-based MotivationsBaseline to 12 weeksMotivations towards eating, assessed using the Food Choice Questionnaire (Steptoe et al., Appetite 1995, 25(3): 267-84). Higher scores denote stronger motivations
Quality of Life (Subjective Wellbeing)Baseline to 12 weeksQuality of Life, measured using the SF-36 questionnaire (Ware et al, 1996), where Quality of Life is assessed out of 100, where a higher score demonstrates better quality of life
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse EventsBaseline to 12 weeksAdverse events, assessed by self-report
BMI12 weeks from baselineBody Mass Index, assessed using researcher measurements or researcher-observed self-measurements

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nutrient-based Recommendations
Participants in this group will be given nutrient-based recommendations to reduce free sugar intakes. Dietary recommendations: Dietary recommendations, with increasing additional behavioural/practical advice or no dietary recommendations
61
Nutrient- and Food-based Recommendations
Participants in this group will be given nutrient- and food-based recommendations to reduce free sugar intakes. Dietary recommendations: Dietary recommendations, with increasing additional behavioural/practical advice or no dietary recommendations
60
Nutrient- and Food-based Recommendations With Food Swaps
Participants in this group will be given nutrient- and food-based recommendations and advice on food swaps to reduce free sugar intakes. Dietary recommendations: Dietary recommendations, with increasing additional behavioural/practical advice or no dietary recommendations
63
Control
Participants in this group will not be given any recommendations to reduce free sugar intakes. Dietary recommendations: Dietary recommendations, with increasing additional behavioural/practical advice or no dietary recommendations
58
Total242

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNutrient-based RecommendationsNutrient- and Food-based RecommendationsNutrient- and Food-based Recommendations With Food SwapsControlTotal
Age, Continuous42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
41.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Free sugar intakes10.1 percentage of total energy intake
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
10.7 percentage of total energy intake
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
10.2 percentage of total energy intake
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
10.4 percentage of total energy intake
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
10.3 percentage of total energy intake
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other background
8 participants10 participants5 participants7 participants30 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
53 participants50 participants58 participants51 participants212 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
61 participants60 participants63 participants58 participants242 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
54 Participants52 Participants55 Participants53 Participants214 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants8 Participants8 Participants5 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 610 / 600 / 630 / 58
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 610 / 600 / 630 / 58
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 611 / 602 / 631 / 58

Outcome results

Primary

Free Sugar Intakes

Percentage energy intake from free sugars, assessed using diet diaries

Time frame: 12 weeks from baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Nutrient-based RecommendationsFree Sugar Intakes7.7 percentage of total energy intakeStandard Error 0.7
Nutrient- and Food-based RecommendationsFree Sugar Intakes7.4 percentage of total energy intakeStandard Error 0.7
Nutrient- and Food-based Recommendations With Food SwapsFree Sugar Intakes7.1 percentage of total energy intakeStandard Error 0.6
ControlFree Sugar Intakes9.2 percentage of total energy intakeStandard Error 0.7
Primary

Number of Participants Who Adhered to the Recommendations Provided

Adherence to the recommendations provided, assessed using diet diaries and self-reported adherence

Time frame: 12 weeks from baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nutrient-based RecommendationsNumber of Participants Who Adhered to the Recommendations Provided38 participants
Nutrient- and Food-based RecommendationsNumber of Participants Who Adhered to the Recommendations Provided39 participants
Nutrient- and Food-based Recommendations With Food SwapsNumber of Participants Who Adhered to the Recommendations Provided39 participants
ControlNumber of Participants Who Adhered to the Recommendations Provided25 participants
Secondary

BMI

Body Mass Index, assessed using researcher measurements or researcher-observed self-measurements

Time frame: 12 weeks from baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Nutrient-based RecommendationsBMI27.2 kg/m2Standard Error 0.7
Nutrient- and Food-based RecommendationsBMI28.1 kg/m2Standard Error 0.7
Nutrient- and Food-based Recommendations With Food SwapsBMI27.1 kg/m2Standard Error 0.7
ControlBMI27.4 kg/m2Standard Error 0.8
Secondary

Dietary Intakes

Energy intake, assessed using diet diaries

Time frame: 12 weeks from baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Nutrient-based RecommendationsDietary Intakes1512 kcal/dayStandard Error 60
Nutrient- and Food-based RecommendationsDietary Intakes1466 kcal/dayStandard Error 70
Nutrient- and Food-based Recommendations With Food SwapsDietary Intakes1495 kcal/dayStandard Error 56
ControlDietary Intakes1516 kcal/dayStandard Error 56
Secondary

Eating-based Attitudes

Attitudes towards eating, assessed using the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (Karlsson J, et al. IJO 2000; 24: 1715-1725)

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary

Eating-based Motivations

Motivations towards eating, assessed using the Food Choice Questionnaire (Steptoe et al., Appetite 1995, 25(3): 267-84). Higher scores denote stronger motivations

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events

Adverse events, assessed by self-report

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Nutrient-based RecommendationsNumber of Participants Reporting Adverse Events1 participants
Nutrient- and Food-based RecommendationsNumber of Participants Reporting Adverse Events1 participants
Nutrient- and Food-based Recommendations With Food SwapsNumber of Participants Reporting Adverse Events2 participants
ControlNumber of Participants Reporting Adverse Events1 participants
Secondary

Quality of Life (Subjective Wellbeing)

Quality of Life, measured using the SF-36 questionnaire (Ware et al, 1996), where Quality of Life is assessed out of 100, where a higher score demonstrates better quality of life

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary

Sweet Food Attitudes

Attitudes towards sugar, sweeteners, and sweet-tasting foods, assessed using a questionnaire, soon to be published. Higher scores denote stronger attitudes.

Time frame: 12 weeks from baseline

Secondary

Sweet Food Choices

Selection of sweet foods/fluids at a given meal, assessed where participants can consume freely from a meal composed of sweet and non-sweet foods, and proportion of sweet foods consumed is measured in terms of weight consumed

Time frame: 12 weeks from baseline

Secondary

Sweet Food Preferences

Preferences for various sweet foods/fluids, assessed using a taste test, where participants sample several sweet and non-sweet foods and rate them for pleasantness on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale. Higher scores signify stronger preferences

Time frame: 12 weeks from baseline

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026