Degenerative Disc Disease, Facet Joint Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Platelet-rich-plasma, intradiscal, intra-articular, degenerative disc disease, facet joint syndrome, facet joint arthritis
Brief summary
Autologous Platelet-Rich-Plasma (PRP) represents a regenerative therapy that has gained remarkable ground in the field of orthopaedics in recent years. PRP has been implemented for a plethora of musculoskeletal ailments, being associated with minor complications and noteworthy efficacy (Akeda et al., 2019). PRP has been depicted to contain a variety of growth factors crucial for regulation of cell proliferation and migration as well as extracellular matrix synthesis (Cheng et al., 2019). Furthermore, therapeutic effect of PRP administration is considered to be additionally exerted via its anti-inflammatory and immunoregulative properties, as it has been delineated to induce regional decrease of pro-inflammatory mediators at the injection site (Hirase et al., 2020). Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) and Facet Joint Syndrome (FJS) constitute chronic degenerative conditions of lumbar spine that have been associated with substantial morbidity and disability in recent years. Besides the noted progress in comprehension of these conditions' pathogenesis, available therapeutic modalities remain extremely limited and controversial, being not capable of altering the natural progress of underlying disease (Wu et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017; Hirase et al., 2020). Autologous PRR has been recommended as a beneficial alternative instead of conventional treatment strategies for interventional management of lumbar DDD and FJS (Aufiero et al., 2015; Navani and Hames, 2015; Kirchner and Anitua, 2016; Levi et al., 2016; Tuakli-Wosornu et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2016; Akeda et al., 2017; Lutz GE, 2017; Wu et al., 2017; Cheng et al., 2019). Results of these studies indicated that intra-discal and intra-articular injection of PRP for DDD and FJS respectively is characterized by safety and satisfactory efficacy in reducing intensity of clinical manifestations, exerting also potentially regenerative effects. However, quality of available evidence is remarkably low, since in the overwhelming majority of these studies was a limited number of patients evaluated. Furthermore, determined follow-up intervals were not extended and, most importantly, patients were not majorly with rigorous clinical and radiologic criteria selected. Aim of this study is to investigate the precise effects of intradiscal and intra-articular injection of PRP in patients with early-stage lumbar DDD and FJS, as determined by particular radiologic classifications. The prospective design, the defined greater number of recruited individuals in pilot analysis as well as the comparatively greater follow-up underline the originality of our protocol.
Interventions
BIOLOGICALAutologous PRP
Participants enrolled in this study will be managed with intradiscal and/or intra-articular injections of autologous PRP according to features of underlying pathology. Participants featuring FJS will be prior to PRP diagnostically and therapeutically injected with local anesthetic in order to verify FJS as the etiology of experienced pain. Injected PRP solution volume is designed to be 0.5-1 ml and 0.5 ml in cases of intradiscal and intra-articular injection, respectively. All participants are planned to receive a single dose of PRP, whilst a maximum of two compromised discs and four facet joints will be treated in each patient.
Sponsors
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Stylianos Kapetanakis
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
All participants fulfilling the predetermined inclusion criteria will be considered eligible to be subjected to treatment with PRP. Injection of PRP will be conducted intradiscally and/or intra-articularly, in cases of lumbar DDD and/or FJS, as defined by clinical and radiologic assessment. Hence, all participants will be assigned to the same intervention.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Eligibility criteria will be distinctly applied in participants with lumbar DDD and FJS prior to treatment application. A. Participants with lumbar DDD Inclusion Criteria * Recurring low back pain persistent for more than 6 months demonstrating discogenic origin (i.e. localized at midline, exacerbated in seated position and alleviated in bed rest) * Failure of initially implemented conservative measures (medication regimen and/or physical therapy sessions or other injections) * Imaginary findings of Grade I-III DDD according to radiologic MRI-based classification proposed by Pfirrmann et al. (Pfirrmann et al., 2001) * Absence of
Exclusion criteria
, as defined below.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores from baseline to post intervention during follow-up | VAS score is planned to be evaluated preoperatively, immediately after intervention, at 6 weeks and at 3,6,12 and 24 months postoperatively. | Participants will be asked to indicate the pain level according to their subjective perception with as spot in a unipolar horizontal line of 100 mm (0: no pain, 100: the worst pain possible). Scores will be calculated in mm, and an one-decimal place approach will be adopted for record. |
| Alteration in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Medical Health Survey Questionnaire Scores from baseline to post intervention during follow-up | SF-36 questionnaire is planned to be evaluated preoperatively, immediately after intervention, at 6 weeks and at 3,6,12 and 24 months postoperatively. | Participants will be asked to complete the analogous questionnaire, so that eight distinct parameters reflecting general health status are evaluated: physical function (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), energy, fatigue and vitality (V), social function (SF), role-emotional (RE) and mental health (MH). Computational processing of collected data will be subsequently conducted, so that each parameter is expressed by a percentage. Greater scores in these 8 parameters are associated with ameliorated Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Complications | Complications will be constantly recorded during the study immediately after intervention, at 6 weeks and at 3,6,12 and 24 months postoperatively. | Safety of implemented procedure is designed to be determined via the record of frequency and kind of perioperative associated complications. |
Contacts
Primary ContactStylianos Kapetanakis, Assistant Professor
Outcome results
None listed