Skip to content

A Comparison of the Resection Rate for Hot and Cold Snare Polypectomy of Colorectal Polyps (10-15 Mm)

A Comparison of the Resection Rate for Hot and Cold Snare Polypectomy of Colorectal Polyps (10-15 Mm) - a Randomized Controlled Trial (COLDSNAP-2)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04816292
Acronym
COLDSNAP-2
Enrollment
850
Registered
2021-03-25
Start date
2024-11-05
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2024-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenomatous Polyps

Brief summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become the third most common malignant tumor and is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. Adenomatous polyps of the colon are possible precursor lesions for CRC. Screening for CRC has been shown effective in preventing CRC and related deaths, especially colonoscopy and resection of adenomatous polyps. Currently, for intermediate sized polyps 5 - 19 mm hot snare polypectomy (HSP) with the use of electrocautery is conventionally used, causing relevant adverse events including haemorrhage and postpolypectomy coagulation syndrome, but is safe regarding complete resection of the polyp due to burning effect on residual tissue. On the other hand, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has grown popularity. Absence of electrocautery makes it technically easier and most important reduces adverse events. CSP is recommended as the preferred technique for polyps \<5 mm by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. In literature, there is one multicenter trial from Japan recommending CSP for polyps 4-9 mm (average polyp size 5,4 mm) and only a few case studies for polyps 10-15 mm with inconsistent results, especially regarding the complete resection and pathological evaluation of the specimen. In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators want to compare the complete resection rates of small and intermediate sized colorectal polyps 10-15 mm with CSP and HSP.

Interventions

PROCEDUREActive Comparator: Hot Snare Polypectomy

Hot Snare Polypectomy with the use of electrocautery for the resection of polyps.

PROCEDUREExperimental: Cold Snare Polypectomy

Cold Snare Polypectomy without the use of electrocautery for the resection of polyps.

Sponsors

Technical University of Munich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Indication for colonoscopy * at least 1 adenomatous polyp 10-15 mm * provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* American Society of Anaesthesiologists class IV or higher * florid inflammatory bowel disease * emergency indication for colonoscopy * haemorrhagic diathesis * continued dual antiplatelet therapy * continued anticoagulant therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete resection rate6 monthsThe histological complete resection rate, determined by pathologically negative margins of the specimen and no residual adenomatous material obtained from two/four biopsies of the resection site.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
En-bloc resection rateDuring procedureNumber of additional resections (snare/forceps) needed.
Rate of immediate bleeding with necessity of haemostasisDuring procedureImmediate bleeding: Bleeding \>30 seconds after snaring.
Rate of impossible resection by CSPDuring procedureAn impossible resection by CSP needs electrocautery for successful resection.
Time required for resectionDuring procedureTime required for resection is the time between the insertion of the snare into working channel to the end of polyp resection. In the HSP group, it is defined as the start of submucosal injection until the end of polyp resection.
Rate of procedure-related adverse events.6 monthsDelayed bleeding, defined as haemorrhage after colonoscopy with the necessity of endoscopic haemostasis.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactVeit Phillip, MD
veit.phillip@mri.tum.de+49894140
Backup ContactJoerg Ulrich, MD
joerg.ulrich@mri.tum.de+49894140

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026