Skip to content

Evaluating UTI Diagnosis in Nursing Homes

Evaluating UTI Diagnosis in Nursing Homes

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04815369
Enrollment
0
Registered
2021-03-25
Start date
2021-06-07
Completion date
2024-11-08
Last updated
2025-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infections

Keywords

Nursing Home, Clostridium difficile, PCR, Long Term Care Facility, Skilled Nursing Facility, National Healthcare Safety Network

Brief summary

This prospective, multicenter, comparative cohort observational study is to determine whether the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, a standardized infrastructure for specimen collection and result delivery, compared with current traditional pathways for urine testing reduces the proportion of UTI patients with poor outcomes.

Detailed description

The objective of this study is to determine if prospective data, collected over 12 months from over 200 nursing homes, will show that the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway is more effective than the Traditional Clinical Pathways for urine testing in UTI diagnosis in Nursing Homes. Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway provides standardized infrastructure for specimen collection, and result dissemination via assigned report point person to verify receipt of actionable data. The pathway also includes several in-services on molecular testing for UTI, Pooled Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing, and polymicrobial infections to help providers better understand test methodology. Standardizing a Clinical Care Pathway for testing and reporting of clinical results approach may lead to a reduction in empiric broad spectrum antibiotic use and in turn better health-related outcomes for patients. Such efficiency in clinical decision making at the time of initial presentation may lead to improved patient care by avoiding ineffective therapy due to mismanagement or incomplete lab diagnosis. The study will be observing the implementation of the Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway and comparing it to traditional clinical care pathways from facility-level data entered into the National Healthcare Safety Network for its LTCF (Long Term Care Facilities) Component.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Pathnostics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion * Certified skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and nursing homes (NH) * Nonprofit or for-profit freestanding facility certified by Medicare and Medicaid * Currently utilizing an EMR system * Minimum bed size of 100 Exclusion * Assisted Living Facilities and Residential Care Facilities * Participation in another UTI trial during the study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce the proportion of patients with UTI-related adverse events.12 MonthsExamine the proportion of patients with UTI-related adverse events requiring emergency hospital services over the course the study with a composite measure of the number of UTI related ED visits and/or subsequent hospitalizations and/or sepsis events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce overall inappropriate antibiotic use.30 DaysExamine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce overall inappropriate antibiotic use as measured by the rate of empiric antibiotic starts and the rate of antimicrobial changes for UTI indication.
Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway is more effective than standard urine testing approaches in the clinical evaluation of UTI diagnosis and management .12 MonthsExamine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway is more effective than standard urine testing approaches in the clinical evaluation of UTI diagnosis and management as measured by UTI incidence and corresponding urine testing rate * (UTI and Catheter associated (CA)-UTI bacterial identification incidence rates (diagnostic aim) * Population UTI Rate = (UTI Episodes/Resident Days) x 1,000 * CA-UTI Rate = (CA-UTI Episode/Catheter days) x 1,000
Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce UTI antibiotic collateral effects.30 DaysExamine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce UTI antibiotic collateral effects as measured by: * C. diff event rate = (Total C. diff events/ total resident days) x 1,000

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026