Skip to content

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Anti-inflammatory (Canakinumab) and Cartilage Stimulating (LNA043) Drugs Injected Into the Knee Joint of Participants With Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)

A Randomized, Four-arm, Canakinumab Placebo-controlled, Participant, Investigator and Sponsor-blinded Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Intra-articular Canakinumab Followed by Intra-articular LNA043 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04814368
Enrollment
23
Registered
2021-03-24
Start date
2021-08-27
Completion date
2024-06-24
Last updated
2025-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

canakinumab, LNA043, knee, osteoarthritis, OA, joint pain, cartilage, MRI, DCE-MRI, KOOS, NRS Pain, IPAQ

Brief summary

The study was established to show safety and efficacy of canakinumab and LNA043 in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Detailed description

This was a non-confirmatory, randomized, four arm, placebo-controlled, participant-, investigator and sponsor-blinded study in participants with symptomatic knee OA with synovial inflammation.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALcanakinumab

Canakinumab 600 mg single intra-articular injection (into the knee) on Day 1

BIOLOGICALLNA043

LNA043 40 mg intra-articular injection (into the knee) every 4 weeks, on Days 15, 43 and 71

Placebo to canakinumab single intra-articular injection (into the knee) on Day 1

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Masking only applies to the canakinumab treatment. LNA043 treatment is open label.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Moderate to severe OA pain (corresponding to NRS Pain ≥5 to ≤9) in the target knee for the majority of days in the last 3 months prior to Screening * KOOS pain subscale \<60 for the target knee during Screening * High sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) ≥1.8 mg/L * Radiographic KL grade 2 to 4 knee OA and joint space width (JSW) 2.0-4.0 mm (men) or 1.5-3.5 mm (women) in the medial tibiofemoral compartment (TFC) in the target knee * Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) diagnosed moderate or severe knee synovitis based on an established synovititis scoring system (moderate score 9-12 or severe score ≥13)

Exclusion criteria

* History of, or planned; knee replacement (partial or total) in either knee; arthroscopy or lavage in either knee within 6 months prior to screening; any other previous surgical intervention in the target knee, or for the contralateral knee within 12 months prior to Screening, including mosaicplasty, microfracture, meniscectomy \>50% or osteotomy * Moderate to severe pain in the contralateral knee for the majority of days in the last 3 months prior to screening * Malalignment \>7.5° in the target knee (either varus or valgus) * Any diagnosis of systemic inflammatory arthritis or connective tissue disease, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, gout, Paget's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus) or other systemic condition that might confound assessment of OA (e.g. fibromyalgia) * Ipsilateral hip OA or hip prosthesis recently implanted (within 1 year prior to screening) or hip replacement on either side planned within the study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cartilage Volume in the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Baseline, Day 197Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in volume of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Baseline, Day 85The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS pain consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Synovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Pre-dose on Days 1, 15, 43, and 71ANGPTL3 is a protein that is primarily involved in the lipid metabolism but has recently been shown to have chondrogenic and chondroprotective effects. ANGPTL3 was measured in synovial fluid.
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 15: pre-dose, 20, 60, 120 and 240 minutes, and 8 and 24 hours post LNA043 first injection on Day 15Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed concentration following a dose. LNA043 serum concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8 or higher). LNA043 was determined by a validated immuno-capture and LC-MS/MS method; the anticipated LLOQ is 10 ng/mL in serum.
Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 15: pre-dose, 20, 60, 120 and 240 minutes, and 8 and 24 hours post LNA043 first injection on Day 15Tmax is the time to reach maximum (peak) drug concentration after single-dose administration (time). LNA043 serum concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8 or higher). LNA043 was determined by a validated immuno-capture and LC-MS/MS method; the anticipated LLOQ is 10 ng/mL in serum.
Area Under Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration Sampling Time (AUClast) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 15: pre-dose, 20, 60, 120 and 240 minutes, and 8 and 24 hours post LNA043 first injection on Day 15AUClast is the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (tlast) of LNA043. LNA043 serum concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8 or higher). LNA043 was determined by a validated immuno-capture and LC-MS/MS method; the anticipated LLOQ is 10 ng/mL in serum.
Change in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Baseline, Day 197 and Day 365Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in volume of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.
Change in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Baseline, Day 365Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in volume of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.
Change in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Baseline, Day 197 and 365Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in thickness of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.
Number of Participants With Anti-LNA043 Antibodies (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885 + LNA043)From pre-dose up to Day 365To evaluate the immunogenicity of LNA043 via validated ligand-binding assay of potential anti-LNA043 antibodies.
Change in Synovitis Level Measured From Ktrans by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Baseline, Day 85Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee with dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) to visualize and quantify changes in k-trans as a marker of the activity of synovial inflammation. During the DCE-MRI acquisition, while the contrast agent is preferentially taken up at sites with an increased perfusion due to the formation of new vessels with high porosity (such as the inflamed synovial membrane), a temporal variation of the MRI signal intensity occurs. When the contrast distributes through the intravascular and extravascular spaces, the MR signal intensity in the image volume elements (voxels) of the target tissue changes over time, generating so-called signal intensity (SI) curves. These curves can then be analyzed to derive parameters related to tissue perfusion. The parameter of primary interest was the volume transfer rate of the gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) from the blood plasma in synovium, commonly referred to as Ktrans.
Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain is a subjective assessment in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The NRS Pain instrument had a recall period of 24 hours and the participants were asked to rate the pain intensity at its worst.
Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 197 and 365The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain is a subjective assessment in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The NRS Pain instrument had a recall period of 24 hours and the participants were asked to rate the pain intensity at its worst.
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS pain consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 197 and 365The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS pain consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS Function in Daily Living (ADL) subscale consisting of 17 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 197 and 365The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS Function in Daily Living (ADL) subscale consisting of 17 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Change in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Baseline, Day 197 and 365Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in thickness of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Pre-dose Day 1, Day 15, Day 43 and 60 minutes after first injection of LNA043 on Day 15ANGPTL3 is a protein that is primarily involved in the lipid metabolism but has recently been shown to have chondrogenic and chondroprotective effects. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed concentration following a dose. ANGPTL3 serum concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8 or higher). ANGPTL3 was determined by a validated ligand binding assay; the anticipated LLOQ is 39.7 pmol/L in serum.

Countries

Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in 11 investigative sites in 6 countries.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of 4 screening visits (Screening 1-4), of which Screening 2 and 4 could be performed remotely.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg
Placebo to ACZ885 single dose intra-articular (i.a) followed by LNA043 40 mg administrated i.a every four weeks, three times.
3
Placebo to ACZ885
Placebo to ACZ885 single dose intra-articular.
9
ACZ885 600 mg + LNA043 40 mg
ACZ885 600 mg single dose i.a. followed by LNA043 40 mg administrated i.a every four weeks, three times.
3
ACZ885 600 mg
ACZ885 600 mg single dose intra-articular.
8
Total23

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor0302
Overall StudySubject Decision1200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgPlacebo to ACZ885ACZ885 600 mg + LNA043 40 mgACZ885 600 mgTotal
Age, Continuous66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.02
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.55
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.43
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
3 Participants9 Participants3 Participants6 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants7 Participants1 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 90 / 30 / 80 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 32 / 91 / 34 / 88 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 90 / 30 / 80 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Cartilage Volume in the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)

Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in volume of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 197

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg and Placebo to ACZ885 who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Cartilage Volume in the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)108.33 µLStandard Deviation 226.451
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Cartilage Volume in the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)-26.13 µLStandard Deviation 65.204
Primary

Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)

The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS pain consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 85

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms ACZ885 600 mg and Placebo to ACZ885 who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)22.2 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.09
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)13.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 13.89
Secondary

Area Under Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration Sampling Time (AUClast) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)

AUClast is the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (tlast) of LNA043. LNA043 serum concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8 or higher). LNA043 was determined by a validated immuno-capture and LC-MS/MS method; the anticipated LLOQ is 10 ng/mL in serum.

Time frame: Day 15: pre-dose, 20, 60, 120 and 240 minutes, and 8 and 24 hours post LNA043 first injection on Day 15

Population: Participants in the pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600mg + LNA043 40mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PK analysis set included all participants who received any study drug, and had at least one available valid (i.e. not flagged for exclusion) PK concentration measurement, and for whom there were no protocol deviations with impact on PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgArea Under Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration Sampling Time (AUClast) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)800 h*ng/mL
Placebo to ACZ885Area Under Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration Sampling Time (AUClast) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)1880 h*ng/mL
Secondary

Change in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)

Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in thickness of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 197 and 365

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg, ACZ885 600 mg + LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600 mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 1970.07 mmStandard Deviation 0.083
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 365-0.03 mmStandard Deviation 0.046
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 1970.13 mmStandard Deviation 0.212
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 3650.04 mmStandard Deviation 0.168
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 197-0.02 mmStandard Deviation 0.121
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 365-0.05 mmStandard Deviation 0.152
Secondary

Change in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)

Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in thickness of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 197 and 365

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg and Placebo to ACZ885 who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 1970.07 mmStandard Deviation 0.083
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 365-0.03 mmStandard Deviation 0.046
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 1970.06 mmStandard Deviation 0.112
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 3650.11 mmStandard Deviation 0.072
Secondary

Change in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)

Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in volume of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 197 and Day 365

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg, ACZ885 600 mg + LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600 mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 197108.33 µLStandard Deviation 226.451
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 365152.78 µLStandard Deviation 135.128
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 197307.90 µLStandard Deviation 580.213
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 36520.54 µLStandard Deviation 557.708
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 197-82.33 µLStandard Deviation 390.645
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 197 and Day 365 (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 365-129.93 µLStandard Deviation 544.793
Secondary

Change in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)

Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee to visualize and quantify changes in volume of cartilage in the index region. The index region was defined as the union of the femoral medial anterior (FMA), central (FMC) and posterior (FMP) cartilage subregions in the knee.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 365

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg and Placebo to ACZ885 who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)152.78 µLStandard Deviation 135.128
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Cartilage Volume of the Index Region Measured by MRI at Day 365 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)20.54 µLStandard Deviation 557.708
Secondary

Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)

The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS Function in Daily Living (ADL) subscale consisting of 17 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 197 and 365

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg, ACZ885 600 mg + LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600 mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 1537.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 34.32
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 2942.6 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 4341.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 28.08
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 5740.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.76
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 7143.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 23.92
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 8541.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.76
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 19750.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.76
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 36544.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 26
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 4316.2 score on scaleStandard Deviation 11.76
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 19736.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 5719.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 8.95
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 7120.6 score on scaleStandard Deviation 10.29
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 8528.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 15.09
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 152.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 8.82
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 2917.2 score on scaleStandard Deviation 4.49
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 36542.2 score on scaleStandard Deviation 13.34
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 4326.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.79
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 2925.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.72
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 1518.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 18.35
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 5731.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 21.99
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 19727.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 23.92
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 8523.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.26
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 7128.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 36533.6 score on scaleStandard Deviation 23.79
Secondary

Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)

The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS Function in Daily Living (ADL) subscale consisting of 17 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms ACZ885 600 mg and Placebo to ACZ885 who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data. In alignment with the study protocol, data collected beyond Day 85 for KOOS function in daily living subscale is not part of this secondary outcome measure comparing the groups ACZ885 versus Placebo to ACZ885.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 1511.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 23.87
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 2914.3 score on scaleStandard Deviation 24.74
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 439.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 17.04
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 5716.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 28.06
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 7116.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 8514.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 23.05
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 7128.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 1518.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 18.35
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 5731.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 21.99
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 2925.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.72
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 8523.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.26
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living (ADL) Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 4326.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.79
Secondary

Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)

The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS pain consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 197 and 365

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg, ACZ885 600 mg + LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600 mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 1525.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 27.5
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 2936.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.64
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 4325.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 15.71
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 5725.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 7.86
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 7129.2 score on scaleStandard Deviation 5.89
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 8525.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 3.93
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 19737.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 9.82
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 36531.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 17.68
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 4315.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 16.74
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 19738.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 12.83
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 5717.6 score on scaleStandard Deviation 5.78
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 7116.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 8522.2 score on scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 153.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 18.91
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 2915.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 9.76
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 36545.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 10.52
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 4321.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 21.28
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 2924.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.52
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 1520.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 5728.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.38
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 19725.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 21.87
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 8522.2 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.09
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 7126.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.03
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 36531.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 26.33
Secondary

Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)

The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the KOOS pain consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms ACZ885 600 mg and Placebo to ACZ885 who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data. In alignment with the study protocol, data collected beyond Day 85 for KOOS pain subscale is not part of this secondary outcome measure comparing the groups ACZ885 versus Placebo to ACZ885.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 1512.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 21.72
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 2916.3 score on scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 4311.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 12.31
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 5713.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 18.96
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 7114.3 score on scaleStandard Deviation 15.75
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 8525.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 3.93
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 7126.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.03
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 1520.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 5728.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 19.38
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 2924.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.52
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 8522.2 score on scaleStandard Deviation 20.09
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 4321.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 21.28
Secondary

Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)

The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain is a subjective assessment in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The NRS Pain instrument had a recall period of 24 hours and the participants were asked to rate the pain intensity at its worst.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 197 and 365

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg, ACZ885 600 mg + LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600 mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 15-3.0 score on scale
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 29-3.0 score on scale
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 43-4.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 57-4.0 score on scale
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 71-4.0 score on scale
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 85-5.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 197-6.0 score on scale
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 365-3.0 score on scale
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 43-0.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 197-3.3 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 57-2.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 0
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 71-2.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 85-3.3 score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 15-0.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 29-1.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 365-4.3 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 43-2.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 29-3.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 15-2.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 57-3.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 197-2.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 85-2.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 71-3.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
ACZ885 600 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885, and ACZ885+LNA043 Versus Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043)Day 365-3.0 score on scaleStandard Deviation 3.83
Secondary

Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)

The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain is a subjective assessment in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The NRS Pain instrument had a recall period of 24 hours and the participants were asked to rate the pain intensity at its worst.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms ACZ885 600 mg and Placebo to ACZ885 who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data. In alignment with the study protocol, data collected beyond Day 85 for NRS pain is not part of this secondary outcome measure comparing the groups ACZ885 versus Placebo to ACZ885.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 15-1.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 29-2.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 43-1.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 57-2.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 71-2.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 85-1.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 71-3.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 15-2.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 57-3.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 29-3.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 85-2.7 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over Time (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)Day 43-2.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Secondary

Change in Synovitis Level Measured From Ktrans by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)

Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee with dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) to visualize and quantify changes in k-trans as a marker of the activity of synovial inflammation. During the DCE-MRI acquisition, while the contrast agent is preferentially taken up at sites with an increased perfusion due to the formation of new vessels with high porosity (such as the inflamed synovial membrane), a temporal variation of the MRI signal intensity occurs. When the contrast distributes through the intravascular and extravascular spaces, the MR signal intensity in the image volume elements (voxels) of the target tissue changes over time, generating so-called signal intensity (SI) curves. These curves can then be analyzed to derive parameters related to tissue perfusion. The parameter of primary interest was the volume transfer rate of the gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) from the blood plasma in synovium, commonly referred to as Ktrans.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 85

Population: Participants in the pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set from the arms ACZ885 600 mg and Placebo to ACZ885 who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PD analysis set included all participants with available PD data and no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgChange in Synovitis Level Measured From Ktrans by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)-0.0009 min^-1Standard Deviation 0.01185
Placebo to ACZ885Change in Synovitis Level Measured From Ktrans by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) (ACZ885 Versus Placebo to ACZ885)-0.0051 min^-1Standard Deviation 0.00702
Secondary

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)

ANGPTL3 is a protein that is primarily involved in the lipid metabolism but has recently been shown to have chondrogenic and chondroprotective effects. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed concentration following a dose. ANGPTL3 serum concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8 or higher). ANGPTL3 was determined by a validated ligand binding assay; the anticipated LLOQ is 39.7 pmol/L in serum.

Time frame: Pre-dose Day 1, Day 15, Day 43 and 60 minutes after first injection of LNA043 on Day 15

Population: Participants in the pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600mg + LNA043 40mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PK analysis set included all participants who received any study drug, and had at least one available valid (i.e. not flagged for exclusion) PK concentration measurement, and for whom there were no protocol deviations with impact on PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)16.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.47
Placebo to ACZ885Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)24.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.32
Secondary

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)

Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed concentration following a dose. LNA043 serum concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8 or higher). LNA043 was determined by a validated immuno-capture and LC-MS/MS method; the anticipated LLOQ is 10 ng/mL in serum.

Time frame: Day 15: pre-dose, 20, 60, 120 and 240 minutes, and 8 and 24 hours post LNA043 first injection on Day 15

Population: Participants in the pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600mg + LNA043 40mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PK analysis set included all participants who received any study drug, and had at least one available valid (i.e. not flagged for exclusion) PK concentration measurement, and for whom there were no protocol deviations with impact on PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)120 ng/mL
Placebo to ACZ885Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)149 ng/mL
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-LNA043 Antibodies (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885 + LNA043)

To evaluate the immunogenicity of LNA043 via validated ligand-binding assay of potential anti-LNA043 antibodies.

Time frame: From pre-dose up to Day 365

Population: Participants in the pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600mg + LNA043 40mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PK analysis set included all participants who received any study drug, and had at least one available valid (i.e. not flagged for exclusion) PK concentration measurement, and for whom there were no protocol deviations with impact on PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-LNA043 Antibodies (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885 + LNA043)0 Participants
Placebo to ACZ885Number of Participants With Anti-LNA043 Antibodies (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885 + LNA043)0 Participants
Secondary

Synovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)

ANGPTL3 is a protein that is primarily involved in the lipid metabolism but has recently been shown to have chondrogenic and chondroprotective effects. ANGPTL3 was measured in synovial fluid.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Days 1, 15, 43, and 71

Population: Participants in the pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600mg + LNA043 40mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PK analysis set included all participants who received any study drug, and had at least one available valid (i.e. not flagged for exclusion) PK concentration measurement, and for whom there were no protocol deviations with impact on PK data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgSynovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 15NA ng/mL
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgSynovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 71NA ng/mL
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgSynovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 43NA ng/mL
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgSynovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 1NA ng/mL
Placebo to ACZ885Synovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 43NA ng/mL
Placebo to ACZ885Synovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 15NA ng/mL
Placebo to ACZ885Synovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 1NA ng/mL
Placebo to ACZ885Synovial Fluid Concentrations of ANGPTL3 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)Day 71NA ng/mL
Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)

Tmax is the time to reach maximum (peak) drug concentration after single-dose administration (time). LNA043 serum concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8 or higher). LNA043 was determined by a validated immuno-capture and LC-MS/MS method; the anticipated LLOQ is 10 ng/mL in serum.

Time frame: Day 15: pre-dose, 20, 60, 120 and 240 minutes, and 8 and 24 hours post LNA043 first injection on Day 15

Population: Participants in the pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set from the arms Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mg and ACZ885 600mg + LNA043 40mg who had an available value for the outcome measure. The PK analysis set included all participants who received any study drug, and had at least one available valid (i.e. not flagged for exclusion) PK concentration measurement, and for whom there were no protocol deviations with impact on PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 40 mgTime to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)2 hour
Placebo to ACZ885Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of LNA043 (Placebo to ACZ885+LNA043 Versus ACZ885+LNA043)4.02 hour

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026